180 likes | 344 Vues
Third Annual Stakeholders’ Forum Mauritius, 21 October 2010. Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective. Caroline Nicholas UNCITRAL October 2010. Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective. UNCITRAL Model Law on Procurement – background
E N D
Third Annual Stakeholders’ ForumMauritius, 21 October 2010 Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Caroline Nicholas UNCITRAL October 2010
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective UNCITRAL Model Law on Procurement – background • Model for national procurement legislation • Minimum standards for procurement Who has used it? • economies in transition/developing countries • MDBs – country procurement systems
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Objectives of the Model Law • Value for money/economy • Efficiency • Participation, competition • Fair treatment • Integrity and public confidence • Transparency
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Reform of Model Law – why? Update the text (1994) • Introduce e-procurement • Apply experience in implementation and use • No change to key principles and features • Consistency with other international texts • Started in 2004, nearly complete • Consensus approach
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Reform 1: e-procurement What is e-procurement? • e-publication • e-communications • e-tendering • e-monitoring
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Reform 1: e-procurement Why? Better • Value for money • Transaction costs/speed • Protection against corruption Through better • Transparency – more information, more easily available • Participation and competition
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Reform 1: e-procurement • Procurement law and e-procurement • Functional equivalence • Technological neutrality • Can the government do e-procurement? • Other laws
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Reform 1: e-procurement • Safeguards • Market access • Security, integrity, confidentiality • Safeguards enhance confidence • Don’t apply higher standards than old systems
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective E-procurement innovations: • e-tendering • Need for standards highest • Mixed systems • Identity management is a key issue • e-reverse auctions • Anonymity vital • Collusion? • Risks of overuse
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Achieving benefits of e-procurement • e-monitoring • Redesigning the procurement system • Not a technological issue alone Systemic reform is needed; takes time
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Reform 2: framework agreements • What are they? • Benefits • Efficiencies • Risks • Competition • Collusion
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Reform 2: framework agreements • UNCITRAL approach – 3 types • Closed framework agreements • With and without second stage competition • Open framework agreements • World Bank and MDBs will use UNCITRAL provisions as standard
Updating the UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement for the Digital Age Reform 3: the ‘toolbox’ approach Procurement methods (updated) • New approach • Primacy of tendering • Justify other methods • All methods available for all procurement • No special services provisions
Updating the UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement for the Digital Age Reform 3: the ‘toolbox’ approach • New and updated methods • Developments in procurement • From rules and compliance • To management and performance • Decentralization and accountability • Supported by standardization • Role of e-procurement • Capacity building is vital
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Other major reforms • SME policies • Green procurement • Sustainable procurement • Costs and benefits • Impact of GPA, RTA membership • Vital role of transparency
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Review of remedies provisions • UNCITRAL 1994 provisions were • Weak • Optional • Many exceptions • New provisions are • Robust • Mandatory • No exceptions
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective Conclusions: Implications of reform • Significant investment • Vital role of e-procurement • Political commitment • Capacity issues • Some methods/techniques/tools more vulnerable than others
Innovative Practices in Procurement – the UNCITRAL perspective http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/commission/working_groups/1Procurement.html http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/fr/commission/working_groups/1Procurement.html THANK YOU