1 / 7

Methodology for Prioritizing Mandates: Current Status and Strategic Alignment

This document outlines a systematic methodology for prioritizing mandates within the organization. It classifies 751 mandates into three types: A (policy guidelines), B (specific measures), and C (operational mandates). The prioritization process involves several steps: updating and classifying mandates, applying filters for consensus and strategic alignment, and evaluating programs based on their impact and organizational capacity. This approach ensures that the mandates are effectively aligned with strategic objectives and can be efficiently implemented to maximize benefits for institutions and populations.

britanni-guerrero
Télécharger la présentation

Methodology for Prioritizing Mandates: Current Status and Strategic Alignment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Methodology for Prioritizing Mandates

  2. Current Status • 751 mandates classified as: • A: Policies or general policy guidelines on the issue in question. • B: Specific measures or activities that support the implementation of type A mandates. • C: Operational mandates of an administrative or financial nature. • Vision (approved) • Strategic guidelines and strategic objectives (negotiation)

  3. Prioritization Methodology

  4. Step 1: Updating of Mandates. Inclusion of mandates from the last GA Identification of duplicated mandates Classification of new mandates into types A, B, and C. A and B mandates: Prioritization by a Working Group of the Permanent Council C mandates: Secretariat's judgment

  5. Step 2: Applying a filter to identify consensus mandates.

  6. Alignment of A and B mandates with Strategic Objectives • Very high • High • Intermediate • Low • Very low • Step 3: Aligning A and B mandates with the Strategic Objectives of the OAS

  7. Evaluation of programs from the point of view of their impact and OAS installed capacity to implement them • Impact: institutions/countries, populations benefited, for how long, etc. • Installed capacity: cost of the program, time and human resources needed to carry it out. • Step 4: Classification of B Mandates according to program impact and the Organization's installed capacity for implementing them

More Related