1 / 46

DM - FOOT EVALUATION IN THE PRIMARY CARE SETTING

DM - FOOT EVALUATION IN THE PRIMARY CARE SETTING. Bernadette Pendergraph , Gloria Sanchez, MDs Cindy Mayeda , RN Department of Family Medicine, Harbor-UCLA. “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” – Benjamin Franklin. Learning Objectives. Medical Knowledge

brone
Télécharger la présentation

DM - FOOT EVALUATION IN THE PRIMARY CARE SETTING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DM - FOOT EVALUATION IN THE PRIMARY CARE SETTING Bernadette Pendergraph, Gloria Sanchez, MDs Cindy Mayeda, RN Department of Family Medicine, Harbor-UCLA “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”– Benjamin Franklin

  2. Learning Objectives • Medical Knowledge a. Perform Comprehensive DM Foot Exam b. Implement ADA DM Foot Guidelines c. Classify DM Foot Ulcers Accurately d. List indications for imaging • Patient Care a. Offloading Devices for DM Ulcers b. Utilize consultants in timely fashion No conflicts of interest

  3. Learning Objectives • System Based Practice a. Utilize resources for patients b. Expedite pt work up & tx PRN • Interpersonal & Communication Skills a. Teach pts DM foot care & precautions b. Collaborate with HC team to examine & treat pts • Professionalism a. Take “ownership” of DM foot ulcer

  4. IMPORTANCE OF FOOT EXAMS • National Hospital Discharge survey 1996 86,000 with DM under went > 1 amputation • DM leading cause of amputation in lower extremities • > 50% preventable • Triad: neuropathy, deformity, trauma • Absence of nerve and vascular complaints is not protective • Incidence of: • Foot ulcers up to 25% lifetime risk, annual risk 2% • ~50% infected • 14-24% amputation • Lower extremity amputation • 50% in same/opposite extremity in 5 yrs. • Mortality all cause at 5 yr 39-68%

  5. IMPORTANCE OF FOOT EXAMS • Healthy People 2020 goals • Increase # of persons receiving at least an annual foot exam • Decrease amputations related to DM • Ethnic risk for amputation per 10,000 persons with DM • African-Americans 95.3 • Hispanic 44.4 • Caucasians 56

  6. IMPORTANCE OF FOOT EXAMS • % amputations related to DM • Hispanics 82.7 • African-Americans 61.6 • Caucasians 56.8 • Foot exam frequency • By patient • Daily 52% • Never 22% • By provider • Type 1 66% • Type 2 52%

  7. COST OF DM FOOT DISEASE • Amputations > $1.1 billion • Ulcer in male 40-65 y.o. $28,000 over 2 yr

  8. RISK FACTORS FOR AMPUTATION • Arterial insufficiency: DM > 10 yrs, Tobacco use • Disease control: high FBS, high A1c, duration = two fold increase • Sex: male • Eng Organ Damage: • Retinopathy • Nephropathy • Cardiovascular disease • Peripheral neuropathy: absent Achilles reflex, decreased vibratory sensation = 2 x likely in amputees • Abnormal gait 15x more likely to injure • Abnormal monofilament exam 60% develoed ulcers, 21% amputations over 32 months

  9. RISK FACTORS FOR AMPUTATION • Abnormal foot anatomy • Nail – Onycholysis, Ingrown • Skin – Xerosis, Corn, Callus, Hair loss • Bone – Halluxvalgus, hammer toes, prominent metatarsal heads, Charcot foot • Previous ulcer or amputations • Loss of monofilament perception – 18 fold increase risk of ulcer

  10. PRECIPITATING EVENTS FOR AMPUTATION • Injury from new shoes • Improper toe nail trimming • Accidental wounds • Thermal injury • 1/3 of injuries self induced in PVD

  11. ADA GUIDELINES • Everyone with DM gets a foot exam • Starts at diagnosis • Frequency: At least annual – stratify high vs low risk • Visual inspection every visit if neuropathy • Prerequisite history • Previous ulceration, amputation, Charcot joint, vascular surgery, angioplasty, tobacco use • Symptoms of claudication or neuropathy • DM complications: renal, visual

  12. ADA GUIDELINESFOR FOOT CARE • Foot exam components • Visual inspection: dermatologic, musculoskeletal, shoe • Neurological assessment: 10g Monofilament + 1 of the following: • Vibration • Pinprick • Ankle reflexes • VPT • Vascular: Pulses, consider ABI

  13. DERMATOLOGIC INSPECTION • Nails • Shape/length • Ingrown, paronychia • Onycholysis • Skin • Xerosis • Callus/Corn/Ulcer • Temperature

  14. MUSCULOSKELETAL ASSESSMENT • Deformities • Toe deformities-claw , hammer • Bunions • Charcot foot

  15. SHOE EVALUATION • Look at the patient’s shoes (Are these shoes appropriate for these feet?) • Type of material? • Good: canvas, suede, leather, elastic • Bad: plastic • Any foreign objects? • Depth appropriate? • Width appropriate? • Size? • How old?

  16. NEUROLOGIC ASSESSMENT • Peripheral neuropathy most common cause of DM foot ulceration • Identify loss of protective sensation (LOPS) • 10 g monofilament • 128 Hz turning fork: vibratory sensation-tip of great toe bilaterally • Pinprick: disposable pin proximal to nail of great toe • Ankle reflexes • Vibration perception threshold testing: mean of 3 readings; VPT > 25V

  17. MONOFILAMENT TESTING • Patient should close the eyes • Check patient on proximal site to demonstrate • Instruct the patient to tell you when he feels the monofilament • Push the monofilament until it bends, then hold for 1-2 seconds • Lift the monofilament from skin • Retest the area where the patient did not feel the monofilament (Avoid callus) • Mark the areas of the foot using a plus sign (+) if they can feel the monofilament and a minus sign (-) if they cannot

  18. VASCULAR ASSESSMENT • PAD is a component cause in 1/3 of ulcers • Risk factor for recurrent wound • Palpate dorsalispedis and posterior tibialis • If pulses are absent or symptoms of PAD, do ABI • DM > 50 yo • DM < 50 with multiple PAD risk factors

  19. ABI Readings • Abnormal >1.2 (medial calcinosis) • Normal 0.9-1.2 • Moderate Vascular Dz 0.4-0.8 • Severe Vascular Dz <0.4

  20. TOE PRESSURE TESTING (TBI) • Consider doing if ABI > 1.2 • Cut off are different than ABI • TBI > 0.5 or > 70 mm Hg = normal • TBI < 0.2 or < 30mm Hg = severely ischemic

  21. RISK CLASSIFICATION

  22. FOOT CONDITIONS TO WATCH OUT FOR • Diabetic foot infections: inframalleolar infection in a person with DM • Acute: Predominantly g+ cocci • Clindamycin • Keflex • Bactrim • Augmentin • Chronic: g-rods • 2nd generation cephalosporin • Linezolid • Daptomycin

  23. DIABETIC FOOT INFECTIONS • Ischemia: obligate anaerobes • Vascular evaluation • Fluoroquinolone + clindamycin • Imipenem • Vancomycin + Ceftazidime + metronidazole

  24. ULCERS • Venous stasis ulcer • Medial malleolar area • Irregular borders • Red-brown staining • Lower extremity edema/varicose veins • Arterial insufficiency ulcer • Tip of the toe • Punched out (clear demarcation) • Pale, dry base without edema

  25. WAGNER ULCER CLASSIFICATION • Grade 0 = no ulcer in high risk foot • Grade 1 = ulcer involving full skin thickness • Grade 2 = ulcer to ligament and muscle • Grade 3 = ulcer with cellulitis/abscess • Grade 4 = localized gangrene • Grade 5 = extensive gangrene involving whole foot

  26. ULCER TREATMENT • Patients should never walk out in the same shoe wear they walked in… • Offload ulcer • Modify shoe insert – cut out area under ulcer • Healing boot • Total contact cast • Assess vascularity • Wound care • Inciting event – shoe, foreign body = xray • Debridement • Assess if Infected • Close follow-up

  27. FOOT CONDITIONS • Charcot foot • Neuropathic joint – progressive destruction of bone and soft tissues at weight bearing joints • Rocker bottom foot with continued ambulation • Incidence in DM: 0.15-2.5% • Recurrence 5% • Bilateral disease 10% • Men = Women

  28. PATHOGENESIS OF CHARCOT

  29. STAGING

  30. WHICH ONE IS CHARCOT FOOT?

  31. NORMAL FOOT

  32. CHARCOT FOOT • Acute • Inflammatory: swelling, increased temperature (3-7°F), redness, bony resorption • Intact skin and pulses • Insensate foot • Treatment • Immobilization: total contact cast • Reduce stress: non-weight bearing • r/o infection • Chronic • Protection: orthotics, surgery

  33. TREATMENT OVERVIEW

  34. OTHER ORTHOSIS • Charcot foot • AFO: offload bottom of foot and reduce ankle motion • Total contact cast: transfer weight away from foot • Pneumatic walker brace

  35. OTHER ORTHOSIS • Charcot foot • AFO: offload bottom of foot and reduce ankle motion • Total contact cast: transfer weight away from foot • Toe amputations • Toe filler • Forefoot amputations: custom shoes

  36. Achilles lengthening • Transmetatarsal amputation

  37. SHOE PRESCRIPTIONS • Healing shoes: post op or heat molded shoes • Depth in-lay: toe deformities, prescription inserts • Extra wide: bunions • Rocker sole: reduce pressure on metatarsal heads; hallux rigidis • Custom molded: severe feet deformities

  38. SHOE PRESCRIPTIONS • Medicare covers custom shoes for persons with DM, in a comprehensive DM care program and one of the following: • H/o amputation • H/o ulcer • H/o preulcerative callus • Peripheral neuropathy with callus • Poor circulation • Foot deformity • Products for the year • One pair of depth shoes with 3 inserts • One pair of custom-molded shoes/inserts with 2 inserts

  39. FOOT CARE INSTRUCTIONS • Good sugar control • Daily visual exam • Moisturize your feet • Appropriate shoe wear – never barefoot, no open toe box • Firm heel counters and uppers – to prevent excessive motion and rolling • A firm and wide outsole – to provide a stable base for the foot • An extra-depth construction with a removable inlay – to provide added cushion; allow room for a custom foot orthosis

  40. HOW TO DEAL WITH PROBLEMS • Thermal injury • Shoe color (8-13°) • Bony abnormalities • Mild deformities: Appropriate depth and width • Athletic shoes • Soft insoles: plastazote/urethrane viscoelastic • Laces or Velco strap • Severe deformities or amputation: Shoe prescription • Relieve excessive pressure • Decrease shock, sheer pressures • Accommodate, stabilize, and support deformities

  41. Medicare pays 80% of what is allowed Depth shoes $126 Custom molded shoes $378 Inserts $64

  42. RISK FACTORS FOR FOOT ULCER • Poor glycemic control • Visual impairment • Previous foot ulcer/amputation • Peripheral neuropathy • PAD • Foot deformity • DM nephropathy • Cigarette smoking

  43. High risk: amputation, ulcer • Elevated A1c doubles risk of amputation

More Related