1 / 22

FY ’04-’05 Annual Report Department of Anatomy

FY ’04-’05 Annual Report Department of Anatomy. Example. Table of Contents. Departmental Report Current State (SWOT) Accomplishments based on FY ’04-’05 Goals Additional Accomplishments Lessons Learned FY ’05-’06 Department Goals and Measure of Success FY ’04-’05 Five Year Goals

bryanpatterson
Télécharger la présentation

FY ’04-’05 Annual Report Department of Anatomy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FY ’04-’05 Annual Report Department of Anatomy Example

  2. Table of Contents Departmental Report • Current State (SWOT) • Accomplishments based on FY ’04-’05 Goals • Additional Accomplishments • Lessons Learned • FY ’05-’06 Department Goals and Measure of Success • FY ’04-’05 Five Year Goals • Department Ideas & Plans Individual Chair Report • Leadership Evaluation • Leadership Lessons Learned • Leadership Development Needs / Plans • Overall Leadership Rating Appendix • COM FY ’05-’06 Imperatives • Leadership Practices Description

  3. Departmental Report

  4. Current State Departmental Report Strengths (internal) - Weaknesses (internal) - Opportunities (external) - Threats (external) -

  5. Accomplishments based on FY ’04-’05 Goals Departmental Report 5.0 = Outstanding 4.5 = Strong to Outstanding 4.0 = Strong 3.5 = Satisfactory to Strong 3.0 = Satisfactory 2.5 = Weak to Satisfactory 2.0 = Weak 1.5 = Unacceptable to Weak 1.0 = Unacceptable

  6. Additional Accomplishments Departmental Report What were other departmental great accomplishments?

  7. Lessons Learned Departmental Report Lessons learned that prevented your department from going from good to GREAT?

  8. FY ’05-’06Department Goals & Measure of Success Departmental Report Creative Educational Model Entrepreneurial Academic Practice Research Really Matters Operational & Financial Innovation People Excellence

  9. FY ’04-’05 Five-Year Goals Departmental Report

  10. Department Ideas & Plans Departmental Report One game-changing idea that will revolutionize your department: Activities your department will do to promote the USF HEALTH brand: Ideas for departmental activities/programs to reward and recognize faculty and staff:

  11. Individual Chair Report

  12. Leadership Evaluation Individual Chair Report 5.0 = Outstanding 4.5 = Strong to Outstanding 4.0 = Strong 3.5 = Satisfactory to Strong 3.0 = Satisfactory 2.5 = Weak to Satisfactory 2.0 = Weak 1.5 = Unacceptable to Weak 1.0 = Unacceptable

  13. Leadership Lessons Learned Individual Chair Report List your leadership lessons learned as a chair:

  14. Leadership Development Needs / Plans • Individual Chair Report

  15. Overall Leadership Rating Individual Chair Report Overall numerical self-rating of your leadership and comments: Additional comments that will help the VP/Dean assess your performance: VP/Dean Overall Rating / Comments: 5.0 = Outstanding 4.5 = Strong to Outstanding 4.0 = Strong 3.5 = Satisfactory to Strong 3.0 = Satisfactory 2.5 = Weak to Satisfactory 2.0 = Weak 1.5 = Unacceptable to Weak 1.0 = Unacceptable

  16. Appendix

  17. ’05-’06 COM Imperatives • LCME Preparedness • Orthopedics residency • Dual degrees • Making new 3-4 year curriculum a success • Continued Growth in Clinical Profits • CRISP Models Implementation • Sport medicine Institute Launch • Profitable Private/Public partnerships • CAHC & TGH building implementation • Aggressive & focused research recruitment • Research productivity -Research support Infrastructure • Improvement in core acquisition & access • Research ranking by 5 or more points Creative Educational Model Entrepreneurial Academic Practice Research Really Matters

  18. Looking Forward’05-’06 COM Imperatives (Continued) • All Source Budgeting -10% less expenses • AIMS Faculty Compensation & Incentive Plans • Quality & outcome improvement initiative • Brand/Communication Excellence • $20M Fund Raising campaign with USF & Others • Faculty Partnership & Development- The leadership Institute • Performance Evaluation Program • Diversity definition and awareness campaign • More USF & HSC integration initiatives Operational & Financial Innovation People Excellence Continued Efforts at National Prominence

  19. Leadership Practices Description Adopted from the AAMC’s “The Successful Medical School Department Chair”

  20. Leadership Practices Description Cont...

  21. Leadership Practices Description Cont...

  22. Leadership Practices Description Cont...

More Related