1 / 29

Rare Event Searches with Xe /TMA TPCs

Rare Event Searches with Xe /TMA TPCs. Diego González- Díaz (Zaragoza University and Tsinghua University), Stony Brook, 04-Oct-2012 . 1. TPCs for rare event searches. CAST ( axion searches ). NEXT-100 (neutrino- less double beta decay ). XENON ( dark matter ).

bryga
Télécharger la présentation

Rare Event Searches with Xe /TMA TPCs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rare Event Searches with Xe/TMA TPCs Diego González-Díaz (Zaragoza University and Tsinghua University), Stony Brook, 04-Oct-2012 1

  2. TPCs for rare event searches CAST (axionsearches) NEXT-100 (neutrino-lessdouble beta decay) XENON (darkmatter) T-REX (directionaldarkmatter) ArgonDM (darkmatter) ………. EXO-200 (neutrino-lessdouble beta decay) 2

  3. Hector Mirallas MicrobulkMicromegas technology • Main characteristics: • Simple and robustall-in-onekapton-clad 2-copper sandwichstructure. • Verylowoutgassingand highradiopurity(<30 μBq/cm2for235U, 238U, 232Th chains). • Multiplicationtakes place in ‘cells’. Geometrical UV-photonquenchingseemstoprovideanimprovedstabilityat highpressures. • Granularitydemandsare easilyscalable. 50 μm 115 μm Veryhighquality of pattern! copper 5 μm S. Cebrian et al, Radiopurity of Micromegas readout planes, Astropart. Phys. 34 (2011) 354-359 y [μm] kapton 50 μm copper Comsol simulation for a typical field configuration at high electron transparency: Edrift/Eamp~0.01 x [μm] 3

  4. A sensible application for next-generation TPC experiments: ββ0-decay constrained by ν-oscillations presentββ0-bounds Inverted mass ordering cosmologicalconstraints Klapdor’s claim Normal mass ordering A relevant figure of merit. Sensitivity to mββ: upper mass limit that can be claimed at 90%CL by a negative result in the next generation ββ0 experiments, as a function of theirexposure. end of inverted mass ordering landscape J. J. Cadenas et al., Sense and sensitivity of double beta decay experiments, JCAP(2011) 4

  5. Canfranc UndergroundLab Why NEXT-100? • Itcovers a ‘technological gap’, providingsimultaneously: • Goodtopologicalinformation. • Goodenergyresolutiondownto 0.5-1%FWHM@Qββ. • Goodprospectsforscalabilityto1Ton. 2-blob ββ0 event at Qββ backgroundevent at Qββ V. Alvarez et al., NEXT-100 Technical design report (TDR). Executive summary, 2012JINST 7 T06001 5

  6. Why microbulk Micromegas? • Flexibility for large area coverage. • Possibly the only affordable technological concept that allows simultaneously for energy resolution and virtually unlimited tracking capabilities at high pressure and large areas (1-5m2). • Assets that will be surely useful for 1Ton experiments . • Extremely radio-pure. . work-line 1 (this talk) • Not mature enough, specially for operation at high pressures. • Not sensitive to the to signal . work-line 2 (work in progress) • A priori compatible with electroluminescence . • Can improve resolution down to Fano factor. • Recover sensitivity to to. Why Xe-TMA? work-line 1 (this talk) They are known to form a Penning mixture, that is a desirable for energy resolution and maximum gain of gaseous detectors. It increases drift velocity and reduces diffussion, recombination and attachment, enhancing the topological signatures. work-line 3 (Dave Nygren et al at Berkeley) Penning mixtures are known to reduce the Fano factor by 1/2-1/3. If TMA fluoresces in the visible region one might expect to keep sensitivity to to and still being able to create electroluminescence (!). J. Phys. Conf Ser. 309(2011)012006 6

  7. General purpose chamber for R&D studies • Main characteristics: • Fully stainless-steel vessel, h=10cm, ϕ=16cm. • Designed for standing pressures in the range 0-15bar. • Mini-TPC with microbulkMicromegas as anode. • Bake out system + turbo pump, allowing for vacuum down to 10-6mbar after full TPC assembly. • Outgassing below 5x10-5 mbar l/s before gas filling. • Gas recirculation through SAES FaciliTorr + Messer Oxysorb getters. • Characterization of system composition with a Pfeiffer OmniStarmass spectrometer. • O2 and H2O impurities estimated (indirectly) to be below 30ppms in running conditions. O2and H2O –meters will be incorporated soon. • Acquisition with: • 1) Canberra 2004/2022 amplifying chain + multichannel analyzer Amptek MCA 8000A. • 2) Oscilloscope. radioactive source goes here Field cage: h= 1-6cm 10 cm 3.5cm Micromegas (50μm gap, 50μm holes, 115 μm pitch) 7 10MΩ/resistors

  8. Diana C. Herrera Operation of Micromegas in Xe+TMA mixtures.General properties. Xe/TMA at ~98.5/1.5 Good transparency even at 10bar. Only achievable through continuous gas purification. Used for this study. 5 Good description and good 1/√E scaling. Find these results at: Xe/TMA at ~98.5/1.5 P = 8bar S. Cebrian et al., Micromegas operation at high pressures in Xenon-Trimethylamine, arXiv 8

  9. Diana C. Herrera Penning at work-I too much too much too little too little too much too much too little too little 9

  10. Diana C. Herrera Penning at work-II Drastic increase in gain at constant field with increasing concentration of TMA! -> Presumably due to the activation of Penning-type energy-transfer mechanisms up to x30-50 increase at constant field Field for a gain=300 1.5-2.5% (optimal range is extremely narrow!) • Necessary increase of the field is much weaker than E/p mainly due to: • Scaling of α = αo p/po • To a smaller extent to the dynamics of the Penning effect. < x3 10

  11. Diana C. Herrera Pressure scan for Penning-optimizedXe/TMA mixtures (~97.5/2.5) Strong exponential drop of the maximum achievable gain at high pressures. -> Possibly due to the increased space charge at constant gain for high pressure. Is it possible to further improve?. Where is the limit?. Xe/TMA at ~98.5/1.5 x400 Xe/TMA at ~98.5/1.5 Energy resolution degrading at high pressure: -> Operation at a much reduced E/p (down to 1/3-1/4) cools the electron swarm at high pressures. 22.1 keV 11

  12. Diana C. Herrera Best energy resolutions for Penning-optimizedXe/TMA mixtures (~97.5/2.5) pure Xe, C. Balan et al., 2011 JINST 6, P02P006 pure Xe, T. Dafni et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 309 (2011) 012009 (similar setup) Xe/TMA, these measurements within a factor x3 of the Fano factor limit for pure Xenon (0.27%FWHM) 12

  13. Francisco Iguaz Preliminary modeling and scopefor large area TPCs Si-diodefortriggering (to) α 241Am driftregion can be imaged γ MM vd [cm/μs] x 4-5 pure Xenon E [V/cm/bar] DT [μm/cm1/2 bar1/2] Region of maximumtransparency in Xe/TMA mixtures x 10! Preliminary comparison with TMA rather reasonable (despite TMA itisrated 3* in Magboltz at themoment) pure Xenon pushing the Magboltz-truth a step further… E [V/cm/bar] 13

  14. Preliminary results with a medium size TPC 14

  15. time-line arrival pumping and bake-out system 30cm 35cm 0.8cmx0.8cm pixelizedmicrobulk Micro-Megas T2K electronics (based on AFTER chip) field-cage 15

  16. Laura Segui Firstresultsfor 1/4th of thereadoutplane (proof of principle) Unfortunatelyconnectivitynotyetperfect: ~10/270pixels are notproperlyconnected. Wehaverecoveredfrom a designproblembymeans of a tediouscapacitiveprocedurethatensures a high (yetnotperfect) connectivity. Work in progress. 241Am 57Co Xe/TMA 96.3/3.7 Edrift= 170 V/cm, Eamp= 54 kV/cm, P = 1 bar 16

  17. Laura Segui Energyresolution • Nextsteps: • Channelequalization • Optimization of pedestal subtraction. • Eventfiltering(forinstance, suddennoiseexplosions). • Improvedfiducialization. • Specially, development of anadequateanalysisforthis new stage. 17

  18. Laura Segui someevents at around60keV 18

  19. Laura Segui someevents at around90keV x-ray candidate 19

  20. Laura Segui someevents at around120keV x-ray candidate x-ray candidate 20

  21. Conclusions • Microbulkmicromegas in Xe-TMA mixtures is an appealing technological option for rare event searches. • The Penning transfer mechanisms seem to be optimally active within a mild 1-3% TMA concentration range, therein virtually un-affecting the experiment exposure (Xenon). • Operation at a gain x400 and at 0.9%FWHM@Qββ,Xe at 10bar is possible. • We would like to study the mixture more systematically with a new batch, specially the maximum gain, reproducibilityand stability. • Preliminary comparisons with Magboltz (TMA rated 3*) suggest that a dramatic factor x10 reduction of the transverse diffusion is within reach. Further studies resorting to event topology are required to validate this estimate. • In order to make this option competitive, we are considering various approaches to determine the to (an obvious one being TMA-fluorescence) • Proof of principle demonstrated for a medium size ϕ=30cm, h=35cm TPC. Tracks can be clearly reconstructed, albeit a crude value for the energy resolution is about a factor x3 worse than for the case of un-segmented readout in small chambers. • However, a large effort is still needed in order to achieve competitive results for the complete medium-size TPC at 10bar. stay tuned! 21

  22. The team • Igor Irastorza • Hector Gomez • Asuncion Rodriguez • Juan Castel • Hector Mirallas • Alicia Diago • Laura Segui • TheopistiDafni • Diego Gonzalez-Diaz • Diana Carolina Herrera • Susana Cebrian • Gloria Luzon • Alfredo Tomas • Esther Ferrer-Ribas (CEA-Saclay) • IannisGiomataris (CEA-Saclay) and Rui Oliveira (CERN) Antonio Teixeira (CERN) and the support of the CERN workshop 22

  23. BACKUP

  24. Status of NEXT-I(MM) on the last collaboration meeting (Nov11) In a nut-shell • Bake-out and pumping systems fully installed: • Gas tightness: <1mbar/day (T-corrected) at 11bar during 10days • Vacuum: ~10-6 mbar after bake-out • Out-gassing: <10-5 mbar l/s • The HV for the 35cm-long drift region proved to be Paschen-tight up to 7kV@1bar and 26kV@8bar in pure Ar. Common wisdom suggests that for Xe it should be usually better. • Mass-spectrometer working steadily. Calibration factors in Xe-TMA mixtures obtained. • Re-circulation system installed. Not commissioned. • Four pixelized μ-bulk MicroMegas (Φ=28cm) installed. • T2K electronics connected. Not thoroughly tested. Analysis software still in early stage.

  25. Status of NEXT-I(MM) today Final system pressure Levels down to Pf=6x10-6 mbar achieved in the present system after ~72h heating time at 130deg.  However, x10-100 worse vacuum levels were used during most of measurements presented here. 

  26. Status of NEXT-I(MM) today Out-gassing Levels below Og=3x10-4 mbar l/s achieved in the present system. From experience it will be much better after bake-out. Unfortunately it was not measured. 

  27. Status of NEXT-I(MM) today Gas tightness Jan-2010 After correcting for temperature variations: Previously: ΔP<1mbar/day at 11bar for 10 days (limited by pressure-meter). Presently: ΔP<3mbar/day at 1bar for 3 days (limited by pressure-meter). No concern regarding gas leakage but more systematic measurements will come.

  28. ~x2 Status of NEXT-I(MM) today Electrical insulation 2%TMA 0%TMA really?? From D. C. Herrera Xe-TMA mixtures much less Paschen-tight than pure Ar (Penning effect at work!), by~ x2. The drift fields are still comfortable and transparency seems to be achievable.  Strong limitation for systematic study of attachment. An extra factor x3 will be handy  If it is Paschen-tight for Xe-TMA, possibly ok for most practical mixtures. 

  29. very seldom, even cosmic-ray triggered events can be directly seen from the mesh external trigger signal mesh signal 180 μs Chamber operation (I) Status of NEXT-I(MM) today electronics situation After grounding optimization and soft RC-filtering, signal is visible at Edrift= 160 V/cm/bar, and EMM = 58kV/cm (Xe-TMA ~ 98/2) with the following parameters: • Mesh signal with single amplifying stage (CANBERRA-2004, tfall~50μs for δ-impulse excitation): • Eth~30keV, rmsEnoise~10keV (fairly stable) • Mesh signal with double amplifying stage (CANBERRA-2004 + spectroscopic amplifier, gaussian response tshaping=8μs): • Eth~10keV, rmsEnoise~3keV (fairly stable) • Pixel signals with T2K electronics (tshaping=2μs): • Eth~1.5keV, rmsEnoise~0.75keV (unstable) Micro-bulk MicroMegas produces nice signals in the scope.  System problems galore: -> cross-talk -> noise -> HV in 2 MMs unproperly applied -> dead pixels -> un-perfect cable-connector contact

More Related