40 likes | 149 Vues
This essay explores the constitutional theory behind the federal bureaucracy's vast authority as it relates to democratic control exercised by elected cabinet members, who are overseen by Parliament. It discusses the distinct roles of the political executive and the bureaucratic executive, evaluates the effectiveness of our democratic system in regulating bureaucracy, and considers the pros and cons of being a cabinet minister versus a deputy minister. By analyzing these facets, the essay aims to present a comprehensive view of the relationship between elected officials and bureaucratic entities.
E N D
Pol Sc 341 Essay • Due January 30 • 800-1000 words (about 4 pages) • Worth 15 percent • Requires careful reading of textbook • Extra research optional –do if necessary to follow up a point
Essay theme “… in accordance with constitutional theory, the vast power and authority of the federal bureaucracy is subject to the democratic control of the elected members of cabinet, with these officials themselves being subject to the oversight of Parliament.” David Johnson, Thinking Government, p. 188
Three essay issues(answer all three) • 1. The key roles of the political executive versus the bureaucratic executive, outlining the differences between the two. • 2. Your assessment of whether our system of government succeeds at imposing sufficient democratic control over the bureaucracy. • 3. Which job you would rather have, a cabinet minister or a deputy minister, and why.
Advice • Read, take notes, and reflect • Formulate your own arguments • Organize your thoughts • Use your own words, but you can use short quotes from authors • References must be properly cited within the paper, and in a bibliography