1 / 29

Carriers Service Framework and Associated UNI Requirements Yong Xue yxue@uu UUNET/WorldCom

Carriers Service Framework and Associated UNI Requirements Yong Xue yxue@uu.net UUNET/WorldCom. Document and Authors. Internet-Draft: <draft-many-carrier-framework-uni-00.txt> Yong Xue , Daniel Awduche UUNET/WorldCom Monica Lazer, John Strand, Jennifer Yates AT&T

bryony
Télécharger la présentation

Carriers Service Framework and Associated UNI Requirements Yong Xue yxue@uu UUNET/WorldCom

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Carriers Service Framework and Associated UNI Requirements Yong Xue yxue@uu.net UUNET/WorldCom 49th IETF

  2. Document and Authors Internet-Draft: <draft-many-carrier-framework-uni-00.txt> Yong Xue , Daniel Awduche UUNET/WorldCom Monica Lazer, John Strand, Jennifer Yates AT&T Larry McAdams Cisco Olga Aparicio, Roderick Dottin Cable & Wireless Rahul Aggarwal Redback Networks 49th IETF

  3. About This Document • Contains the carrier optical service framework and major requirements developed by OIF Carrier Study Group • These requirements have been used to guide OIF UNI1.0 development and liaisoned to T1X1.5 and ITU SG 13 as input to ITU G.Ason development. • Still a work-in-progress document. Addressing issues of most concern in carriers community and not meant to be complete and comprehensive at this stage. • Cover more than just IP client 49th IETF

  4. Carriers Major Concerns • Viable optical business and service models • UNI and optical connection requirements • Network reference models and support • Security is a big concern: resource and access control • Control plane functions w.r.t UNI • Scalability 49th IETF

  5. Carriers Objectives • Promote a standardized optical control plane with its associated interfaces and protocols to achieve multi-vendor/multi-carrier interoperability. • Provide rapid automatic end-to-end provisioning of optical connection across one or more optical networks. • Support different service and business models including “branded” services, bandwidth-on-demand services , and Optical VPN (OVPN). • Support multiple different client signal types, including IP, ATM, PDH PL, SONET/SDH, and transparent signals • Promote policy-based call acceptance, peering policies and access/resource control. 49th IETF

  6. Carriers Objectives • Support the scalability both at node and network level: several thousands of ports per node and hundreds of switch nodes per network. • Provide restoration, diverse routing and other Qos features within the control plane on a per-service-path basis. • Reduce the need and cost for carrier developed OSS software development 49th IETF

  7. Optical Network 49th IETF

  8. Optical Network • Major Components • Optical Network Elements (ONE): OXC, OADM • User Edge Device (UED): IP Router, ATM, FR, SONET • Sub-networks • DWDM Optical Line System (OLS) • Network Access Methods • Cross-office (co-located) • Inter-office (remote) • Via third-party carrier • Abstract Model: A set of ingress/egress ports and a well-defined set of p2p optical connection services. 49th IETF

  9. Basic Optical Service Models • Provisioned Bandwidth Service (PBS) • “Point and click” and static near-real-time provisioning through management interface (via NMS or OSS) • Client/Server relationship between clients and optical network • Customer has no network visibility and depends on network intelligence. • Bandwidth on Demand Service (BODS) • Signaled connection request via UNI • Dynamic and real-time provisioning in seconds or sub-seconds • Customer has no, limited or full network visibility depending upon interconnecting and control model used • Rely on network or client intelligence based on the interconnecting and control model used 49th IETF

  10. Basic Optical Service Models • Optical Virtual Private Network (OVPN) • Customers contract for specific set network resources such as link bandwidth, wavelength, and/or optical connection ports. • Closed User Group (CUS) and virtual network • Optical connection can be based on signaled or static provisioning • Customer may have limited visibility and control of contracted network resources 49th IETF

  11. Optical Connection Services • Service Definition: • A fixed bandwidth connection between an ingress port and an egress port across the optical transport network. • Optical Connection Behavior Defined by its Attributes: • identification-based: unique connection ID, contract ID, user group ID, source and destination identifiers (address, port, channel and sub-channel) • characteristics-based: framing ( type, bandwidth, transparency, directionality), priority, protection (1+1, 1:n, unprotected, etc.), scheduling and service level. • Routing-based: diversity 49th IETF

  12. Optical Connection Services • Optical Connection Operations • Requests to create, delete, modify and query an optical connection • Only non-destructive attribute modification is allowed. • A status code should be returned for each operation request. • Same functions should be available via management interface 49th IETF

  13. Service Requirements • Service Type and Granularity • SONET/SDH: STS-n/STM-m • OC-48/STM-16 & OC-192/STM-64 • OC-768/STM-256 • Ethernet: 1Gb/s E, 10Gb/s E (LAN and WAN mode) • PDH: DS1/E1, DS3/E3, … • Other Choices • Sub-rates multiplexed interfaces (both channelized and concatenated) • G.709 digital wrapper, • selectable rates interfaces, • composite interfaces • Interface Type vs. Service Type 49th IETF

  14. Service Requirements • Addressing Schema • Separation of client network and optical network address space • Provisioning based on the client address or names, including IP, NSAP and E.164 • Address resolution and address translation service should be provided by the optical network. • Qos Service Mapping from SLA Contract • Service provider has flexibility to map different class of services (COS) to its own set of priority, protection, restoration parameters. 49th IETF

  15. Sub-Rate Service Framework • Wavelength (Lambda) switching at DWMD channel rate ( OC-48/STM-16 and up) in optical domain. • Sub-Rate: • switched at less than 2.5Gb/s switching in the electrical domain • Sub-rate extension to UNI: UNI-SR • Separate process for ONE-SR • ONE-SR • Multiplexing/demultiplexing • Mapping and adaptation • Possible implementation: separate box or software process 49th IETF

  16. Sub-Rate Service Framework 49th IETF

  17. Network Reference Model • An Optical Network Can be Decomposed into Three Logical Network Planes • User Data Plane (U-Plane) • Control Plane (C-Plane) • Management Plane (M-Plane) • Each Logical Network Plane Consists of • A plane-specific set of networking functions • A transport network • Optical Networking Function • optical connection routing • optical connection switching • optical connection multiplexing/demultiplexing • optical connection protection and restoration 49th IETF

  18. Carrier Network Reference Model • Consists of one or more sub-networks • With equipment from single or multiple vendors • With equipment based on single or multiple technologies • Interfaces Reference Points • User-Network Interface (UNI) and Network-Network Interface (NNI) • Private vs. Public UNI/NNI: Based on trust relationship between interconnected optical domains • Data Service Interface (DSI) • UNI Sub-rate (UNI-SR) • Inter-carrier vs. Intra-carrier model 49th IETF

  19. Inter-Carrier Network Model 49th IETF

  20. Intra-Carrier Network Model 49th IETF

  21. Control Plane Architecture • Control Plane Functions • Signaling and Routing • Resource, end-systems and service discovery • End-to-end auto optical connection provisioning, tear-down, and management • Support direct switching cross-connect provisioning for permanent connection • Support various optical connection protection and restoration schema • Control Plane Function Access Support via: • UNI • NNI • NMS/EMS 49th IETF

  22. UNI Signaling Model • UNI-C and UNI-N Control Process • Functional entities for signaling associated with client-side ED and network-side ONE. • Tightly-coupled vs. loosely-coupled. • Signaling Methods • IN-Band:Signaling messages carried over a logical communication channel embedded in the data-carrying optical link or channel between UNI-C and UNI-N • Out-of-Band: Signaling messages carried over a dedicated communication channel or fiber path separate from the data-carrying optical link or channel between UNI-C and UNI-N • In-Fiber vs. Out-of-Fiber • Third-party Signaling: UNI-C is non-ED resident and directly communicates with UNI-N of ONE on behalf of ED. 49th IETF

  23. Service and End-System Discovery • Service Discovery • Querying and Signaling to ED available services and parameters • Support automatic service request and provisioning • Carried by the service discovery protocol • End-System Discovery • Auto identification between ONE and ED, and between ONEs • Link connection state discovery • Auto address registration/de-registration • Carried by the service discovery protocol • Exchange of defined set of local topological and identity information • Exchanged information accessible via management interface 49th IETF

  24. Routing Functions and Models • Routing Function: • Dissemination and propagation of reachability, resource, and topological information. • Optical connection path computation. • Route Generation • Static configuration • Route server • Dynamic learning via routing protocol • Routing Model • Overlay, Peer and Augmented • Carriers are very sensitive to routing model selection due to security and scalability concerns. • Configurable and enforceable routing control policy should be supported at UNI/NNI 49th IETF

  25. Routing Functions and Models • Overlay Model • Optical network and client networks are independent routing domains • No routing information exchanged at UNI/NNI • Required support at both private UNI/NNI and Public UNI/NNI • Peer Model • Optical network and client networks are integrated routing domains and running the same routing protocol • Full or partial routing information exchanged at UNI/NNI • Support only allowed at private UNI/NNI • Some possible scaling issues 49th IETF

  26. Routing Functions and Models • Augmented Model • Optical network and client networks are independent routing domains • Only client network reachabilty information carried across optical network and advertised to other clients. • An inter-domain routing protocol used at UNI/NNI • May be supported at both private UNI/NNI and public UNI/NNI 49th IETF

  27. Routing Constraint Support • Diversity • Shared Risk Link Group (SRLG) • K-out-of N Diversity • Hierarchical and Geographic Diversity (Node/Network/Location) • Channel Grouping • TDM Multiplexed Sub-channels Bundling • Wavelength Grouping (Waveband) • Edge Compatibility • Laser Frequency • Compatible Adaptation Functions • User/Peer Group 49th IETF

  28. Security and Access Control • Trust Relationship Between Network and Clients as Well as Between Two Networks • Trusted vs. untrusted relation • Distinguish between private and public UNI/NNI interfaces at network demarcation points. • Policy-Based Control • Configurable and enforceable policy-based access/resource control at UNI/NNI Interfaces • Different policy defined at private and public interfaces • Service Request Authentication and Authorization • Network Resources Information Access Control • Firewall between UNI and NNI 49th IETF

  29. Questions ? Thanks! 49th IETF

More Related