1 / 12

Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack

Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack. Date: 2010-0 5 - 19. Authors:. Background. Two ACK mechanisms for DL MU MIMO are being discussed in TGac Scheduled Ack protocol Polled Ack protocol Pros and Cons for polled ack mechanism

bryony
Télécharger la présentation

Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack Date: 2010-05-19 Authors:

  2. Background • Two ACK mechanisms for DL MU MIMO are being discussed in TGac • Scheduled Ack protocol • Polled Ack protocol • Pros and Cons for polled ack mechanism • More robust when there is no MAC protection and has lower complexity • More overhead by sending multiple BAR/BA exchanges yet STAs don’t need to schedule BA transmissions • Pros and Cons for scheduled ack • Slightly more efficient than polled ack • Still there is no solution to fill the gap caused by missing BA  Error recovery mechanism is necessary

  3. Outline • Possible DL MU MIMO scenarios using scheduled ack without error recovery mechanism • Scheduled ack without error • Scheduled ack with an error • Introduction of scheduled ack protocol with error recovery • Error recovery for invalid BlockAck • Error recovery for missing BlockAck • Conclusions

  4. Downlink MU-MIMO functions • General Downlink MU-MIMO functions • Sounding • Group control schemes • NAV distribution • Beamformed data transmissions • Response phase  Scope of this contribution

  5. DL MU MIMO using scheduled acks without error • By channel access rules, MU MIMO data transmission follows sounding procedure, group control scheme and NAV distribution procedure • After MU-MIMO data transmission, each STA sends its BlockAck frame using SIFS time in sequence By channel access rules MU-MIMO data transmission AP SIFS STA1 BA SIFS STA2 BA SIFS STA3 BA

  6. DL MU MIMO using scheduled acks with an error: Invalid BA • When the AP does not correctly receive an BlockAck frame from STA2, the arrived frame is invalid but the channel is not idle • According to the scheduled ack mechanism, the AP has to wait for the arrival of the last BA frame in multiple BA sequence By channel access rules MU-MIMO data transmission AP SIFS STA1 BA SIFS STA2 BA SIFS STA3 BA

  7. DL MU MIMO using scheduled acks with an error: Missing BA • When STA2 does not correctly receive the beamformed data from AP, it does not send BA and the external channel is idle • The probability of collision for the medium is increased during the gap because the AP also waits for the arrival of the last BA frame By medium access rules MU-MIMO data for STA1 MU-MIMO data for STA2 MU-MIMO data for STA3 AP SIFS STA1 BA SIFS STA2 SIFS STA3 BA

  8. Recovery mechanism for Invalid BlockAck • After the last BA frame in the response sequence is arrived, the AP sends a Group BAR frame for recovery at a rate that is less or equal to the rate of the previous BA frame arrived • Group BAR solicits BlockAck from STAs whose BlockAck was not correctly received By medium access rules MU-MIMO data transmission Backoff procedure AP Group BAR … SIFS STA1 BA SIFS SIFS STA2 BA BA SIFS SIFS STA3 BA BA

  9. Recovery mechanism for Missing BlockAck • If an AP senses a missing BlockAck frame in response at predefined time, the AP sends Group BAR frame for recovery at PIFS after the previous BlockAck frame • Group BAR frame occupies the medium during gap owing to missing BA and the probability of collision is reduced • Group BAR may reschedule the BlockAck response sequence By medium access rules MU-MIMO data for STA1 MU-MIMO data for STA2 MU-MIMO data for STA3 PIFS AP Group BAR SIFS STA1 BA SIFS STA2 SIFS BA STA3 SIFS BA

  10. Example of group BlockAckReq frame • Group BlockAckReq is a BAR frame containing group control information • Group control information contains the Group ID and the receiving STAs’ information • Using this information, Group BAR can reschedule the BA response sequence on the wireless circumstance Group ID receiving STAs’ information Figure. Group Control Information configuration (example)

  11. Conclusion • In general, polled ack is more robust than scheduled ack schemes on error prone channels • Scheduled Ack mechanism introduces less overhead but a STA needs to schedule its BA transmission and does not have an error recovery mechanism • Proposed an error recovery scheme to overcome disadvantages of scheduled ack  It is necessary to consider using two ack protocols for DL MU-MIMO transmission

  12. References [1] Robert Stacey, et. al., DL MU-MIMO ack protocol, IEEE 802.11-09/1172r0, Nov. 16, 2009 [2] Michelle Gong, et. al., DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results, IEEE 802.11-10/0324r1, Mar. 15, 2010

More Related