200 likes | 209 Vues
This paper explores the relationship between inflation targeting, fiscal feedbacks, and the existence of multiple equilibria in the economy. The model consists of two blocks: the reaction function block, which includes the Phillips curve, IS function, and loss function; and the fiscal/arbitrage block, which models the relationship between domestic interest rates, fiscal policy, and the probability of default. The paper discusses the implications of multiple equilibria and unstable equilibrium properties, and highlights the importance of primary surpluses, public debt, and supply and demand shocks in determining the inflation floor.
E N D
How tough should you beInflation targeting, fiscal feedbacks, and multiple equilibria Alexandre Schwartsman Unibanco
The model structure Model consists of 2 blocks • The reaction function block • A “minimalist” inflation targeting model • Phillips Curve • “IS” function • Loss function • The fiscal/arbitrage block • Explicit modeling of: • Arbitrage between sovereign and risk –free debt instruments • Relationship between domestic interest rates, fiscal policy and probability of default
The reaction function block - 1 Phillips curve “IS” function Loss function Transmission mechanisms and efficacy usually associated to parameters a, b
The reaction function block - 2 Modeling the exchange rate requires 2 assumptions Uncovered interest parity Mean reversal Thus, the current exchange rate behavior is given by
The reaction function block - 3 Reduced form for the Central Bank’s reaction function
The fiscal/arbitrage block Assume 2 other assets, in addition to the local bond Risk-free bond with yield iUS Risky sovereign bond with yield i* Risk neutral agents equate expected return where (1-l) is the probability of default
Modeling the default risk - 1 • Primary surplus is random variable with support [sL, sH] • Default rule: if primary surplus is higher than real debt service [s (i-p)b], pay; otherwise total default Zero probability of default 100% probability of default
Modeling the default risk - 2 Repayment probability can be expressed as a function of domestic interest rate
Arbitrage The arbitrage equation then becomes
Comparison to standard case Interest rates are higher than in standard case (exogenous i*) Fiscal feedback reduces efficiency of monetary policy instrument
Comparative statics Fiscal policy Risk-free rate Usual transmission channels Shocks
Existence For simplicity assume primary surplus uniformly distributed
Implication of inflation “floor” Setting the inflation target below the critical threshold implies no possible equilibrium
Determinants of inflation “floor” Inflation floor depends essentially on 3 determinants • Primary surpluses • Public debt • Size of supply and demand shocks
Unstable equilibrium properties “Bad” equilibrium associated to weaker currency due to higher interest rate differential
Bizarre shock responses Responses to fiscal policy and shocks at odd with the data
Saddlepath properties? Model does not have saddlepath properties, that is, Central Bank behavior is myopic (converges to stable equilibrium) If Central Bank were to choose the equilibrium, why would it choose the “bad” one?
Extension Possibility of further equilibria, depending on primary surplus distribution (if second order condition fails) Stable high-interest rate equilibrium (C)
Concluding remarks • Multiple equilibria, at least in this setting, do not seem to be the cause behind high real interest rate • Fiscal feedbacks, nonetheless, imply higher interest rates than standard exogenous interest rate case • Feedbacks depend on sensitivity of default likelihood to domestic interest rates, which is an empirical issue. Other forces may be at work (global “risk aversion”) • Future direction of research: Central Bank reaction when output gap enters loss function; possibility of further equilibria depending on the primary surplus distribution