1 / 40

Br Foot print PPT Districts

from this my handout i need some question and answer please provide from my ppt file question and answer

bulale
Télécharger la présentation

Br Foot print PPT Districts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Retail and Branch Banking CBE Branches’ Economic Profitability Analysis NOVEMBER 2023

  2. Outline

  3. 1. Introduction • what are the bases for Branch Establishment: • Feasibility Study forwarded from Districts • Society or local administration request • Branch Establishment Procedure • NBE Directive But so far CBE did not exercise branch optimization or profitability analysis after establishment • What are the basic metrics for profitability: Macro (Corporate) level; • Return on Asset (ROA); • Return on Equity (ROE); • Net Interest Margin (NIM) • Operational profit, Etc.

  4. 1. Introduction Micro (Branch) level • We could not apply corporate level metrics for the following reasons. • Branches performance needs to be considered beyond the PL position (Financial inclusion) • Single branches balance sheet is unbalanced (some may be deposit substantial or others loan substantial) • Contribution for the branch network (inter branch Txn) • The need to consider forgone or gained benefits and implicit costs.

  5. 2. Objective, Methodology & Scope Objective • Mainly to indicate optimality of CBE branch network. Specifically;   • Assess CBE branches economic profit holistically; • Indicate main source of economic profit/loss; • Propose possible intervention; • Set possible considerations; and • Forward practical recommendations/improvement plan.

  6. 2. Objective . Cont. ………… Methodology • Both financialand non financial metrics were used; • Financial data from IM & Finance • Average yield rate was applied on loanable funds and FCY collected • Income and expenses in Head Office, Regional and District office books were cascaded to cost centres (HO, IBS & Branches) • Loanable fund was determined net of 20% liquidity reserve requirement of CBE • Operational expense (salary & benefit and general expense) of all cost centre were adjusted per their contribution for the network

  7. 2. Objective . Cont. ………… Scope • All Branches opened before June 30, 2023 were included; • All Branches less <=2 years were excluded from optimization plan; • All branches under former Mekele District were also excluded from optimization; • Gondar = 16 branches • Mekele = 57 branches (all) • Shire = 43 branches (all) • Semera = 3 branches

  8. Branches cont. … Evaluation Metrics • Economic Profitability • The consultant (Mckyinsey & Co) recommended to optimize branches footprint based on their performance (economic profit) • CBE has exercised economic profitability analysis since 2019 but it did not take any intervention action so far • Other consideration (Txn volume, deposit per account, economic efficiency, distance)

  9. Branch. Cont. … How Branches Economic Profit determined? • Consider forgone benefits and implicit cost • Determine cost centres • Determine bases for income calculation, expense and income allocation • Apply income transfer and cost sharing rate/percentile • Generate Total economic Income and Expense

  10. Branch. Cont. … • Income (Revenue): • Remove Interest income from branches book; • Transfer income forloanable fund contribution • Income from FCY based on FCY collection & payment contribution • Commission and charges (non FCY related) • Gain on FCY dealing (market deal) • Other incomes

  11. Branch. Cont. … • Expense (Cost): • Interest expense • Non-Interest Expense (salary & benefit and general expenses) Shared from HO, Districts and Regions • Adjusted operational Expense (salary & benefits and general expense) (+/- Txn contribution to the network = Txn cost * No. Txn +/-) • Loss on FCY deal (market deal)

  12. Branch. Cont. … Standard Setting: • Income Distribution criteria

  13. Branch. Cont. … • Expense Distribution criteria

  14. Branch. Cont. … • Income transfer rate for loanable fund

  15. Branch. Cont. … • Transfer rate for FX related income;

  16. Branch. Cont. … • Opex Adjustment Rate

  17. Branch. Cont. …

  18. Branch. Cont. … • Final Result

  19. Branch. Cont. …

  20. Branch. Cont. …

  21. Branch. Cont. …

  22. Branch. Cont. …

  23. Branch. Cont. …

  24. Branch. Cont. … Top 20 economic loss making Branches (12.16%)

  25. Branch. Cont. … Top 20 economic loss making Branches (14%)

  26. Branch. Cont. … Top 20 economic loss making Branches (9.47%)

  27. Branch. Cont. … Top 20 economic profit making Branches (12.16%)

  28. Branch. Cont. … Top 20 economic profit making Branches (14%)

  29. Branch. Cont. … Top 20 economic profit making Branches (9.47%)

  30. Branch. Cont. … Major causes for branches loss: • From the revenue side: • Low fund transfer income (Due to low deposit) • Low non- interest income (Due to heavy Txn users) • Low FCY related income (Due to low FCY earned) • From the cost side: • High interest expense (High cost bearing deposit) • High amount of operating expense (High overhead cost/unproductive expenditure) • High number of in branch transaction with free service

  31. Thresholds for Optimization Thresholds (Consolidation) • Economic loss incurring Branch; • Age of Branch > 2 years; • Transaction per annum <= 167,00 (net work average); • Average deposit per account <= 12,800 (50% of the corporate); • Minimum deposit amount for three years <= 90 million; and • Operational efficiency >= 1.33 (at least failed to cover 75% cost). Considerations • Distance from near by branch >= 5 kilo meter; • Branch in remote area (not additional branch); and • Branch size (> Grade –II).

  32. Thresholds, Opt. cont. … Optimization Model (3 Archetype) • Transforming • Economic loss; • High revenue and high transaction; or • Low revenue and high transaction. • Reformatting • Economic loss; and • High revenue and low transaction • Consolidation • Economic loss; and • Low revenue and low transaction (< Network average =44.10 million & 167,000).

  33. Thresholds, Opt. cont. … Possible innervation • Transforming • Squeeze & enhance staff productivity. • Migrate in branch transaction; • Enhance sales effectiveness; • Increase share of non-interest bearing deposits; and • Reformatting • Increase share of non-interest bearing deposits; • Regrading branch downwards or Re-propose.

  34. Thresholds, Opt. cont. … Consolidation • Squeeze & enhance staff productivity. • Migrate in branch transaction; • Enhance sales effectiveness; • Increase share of non-interest bearing deposits; • Dawn grade or repurpose the branch; • Consolidate.

  35. Thresholds, Opt. cont. … Expected Revenue/Resource (Total Economic Expense/Total Revenue = 1 (Equibrum)

  36. Thresholds, Opt. cont. … Prioritization plan • Start with high economic loss making branches (41 Branches; 2 per city District and 1 per outlying Districts); • proceed with next higher economic loss making Branches (346 Branches, all under Central Region and 10 branches per outlying Districts); • The remaining Branches(569 branches); • Start with transforming, proceed to reformatting and finally consolidation. • Starting from July 01, 2024 and onwards, we will take action (Reformatting & Consolidation)

  37. Proposal & Recommendation Proposal • Provide targets based on indicative potential and enforce branches to fill their deficit • Apply appropriate optimization archetype on all economical loss making branches starting from this date onwards.

  38. Proposal & Recommendation Recommendation • Prior optimizations of all economical loss making Branches > 2yrs (956 branches) • Immediate implementation of an effective cost and revenue management system across all CBE branches • Endorsed by EMC on November 06, 2023.

  39. Action Plan • The action plan will be finalized up to end of this week and communicated to all actors.

  40. Thank You!!!

More Related