120 likes | 242 Vues
The debate on the relevance of separate testing phases in software development continues to intensify. Experts like Derk-Jan de Grood question the traditional approaches, suggesting alternatives may not fit every context. While some advocate for a shift away from segmented testing, it’s crucial to consider various factors such as system type, client-supplier dynamics, and team skills. This article explores the pros and cons of the evolving test strategy landscape and emphasizes the importance of understanding your project's unique needs for effective quality assurance.
E N D
Testphases still relevant? Derk-Jan de Grood
What Goyko and James say Testing phase is dead
How does it affect me ? Should I do something ? Are they just hyping ? Is it true what they say ?
Mainmessage • A separate test phase is out of fashion • Alternatives for a separate test phase do not work in all cases • Test strategist will need skills and understanding to choose the best option
Con’s • Type of system • Client – Supplier development • People aspects • Architecture • Politics • Legacy
Test strategy ? Goal Fears Worries Succes factors Uncertainties Challenges
Traditional testphase What is the addedvalue of a test phase ?
New technology and legacy system Team skills Chain partner