1 / 12

RTF Grad Student Portfolio

This project focused on creating a centralized web space for RTF graduate students to showcase their work and capabilities, addressing the limitations of the existing directory which was often outdated. Recognizing that few students had an online presence, we envisioned a user-friendly platform that would allow students to upload and maintain their portfolios. Utilizing a 'Web 2.0' approach, the site would facilitate self-updating features while ensuring a professional and consistent layout, ultimately enhancing the department's image. The importance of a simple interface and potential training for users was identified, particularly given the varying levels of technical expertise among students.

cachez
Télécharger la présentation

RTF Grad Student Portfolio

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RTF Grad Student Portfolio Chris McConnell December 6, 2006 Information Architecture I

  2. Idea that led to the Project • Last year, a central Web space for RTF graduate students was proposed. • Existing student directory was updated infrequently. • Production MFAs approached me to build them Web sites. • Few Media Studies students have a Web presence.

  3. Some Considerations • The department Webmaster has little time to update and proofread student directory, leading to bad information. • Production & Screenwriting students often want to update information as work progresses or festivals loom. • Department does not want to be responsible for student-generated content.

  4. A “Web 2.0” Site? • Ideally students would be able to upload their own content to the site, and update it as needed. • Few students would have the time or expertise to hand-code sites. • A consistent layout and site would enhance the overall image of the deparment. • Moving it to a private server would reduce fears of damaging department reputation.

  5. Who Would Use this Site? • RTF Graduate Students • Prospective Graduate Students • Festival Atendees • Funders • Other members of the community.

  6. Single Student Portfolio Site

  7. Multi-Student Portfolio Site

  8. Basic Site Metaphor • A Directory! • Users are probably interested in two kinds of information: specific students and specific programs • There are few different kinds of information uploaded, but a lot of it.

  9. Labeling • Because the metaphor is simple, the labels are pretty simple, mostly the program tracks. • One issue is how to label “production” • MFA? • Production? • Filmmaking.

  10. Color Palettes • Because the site is designed for UT student work, the clear answer is to use a palette based on burnt orange. • Simple de-saturated colors • Web-safe-ish… • Text-based templates for maintenance and visual media • Relatively simple CSS

  11. WordPress • Standard blogging engine/CMS • Seemed to be easy enough for uploading by student end-users • Requires a significant amount of hacking to use as CMS • Plugins, editing PHP templates. • Sometimes behaved strangely.

  12. Lessons Learned • MFA students, erm, production students often already have web sites. • A simple directory or Friendster-like site may be enough. • WordPress is probably too difficult for people to pick up cold. • Require training session for students.

More Related