1 / 12

User vs Nonuser : Top 750 PD-360 Analysis :

User vs Nonuser : Top 750 PD-360 Analysis :. Prepared by Steven H. Shaha, PhD, DBA. Does teacher engagement i n PD 360, significantly affect s tudent success?. Methods.

caesar-conley
Télécharger la présentation

User vs Nonuser : Top 750 PD-360 Analysis :

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. User vs Nonuser :Top 750 PD-360 Analysis: Prepared by Steven H. Shaha, PhD, DBA

  2. Does teacher engagement in PD 360, significantly affect student success?

  3. Methods • Design: Quasi-experimental, retrospective, pre-post, normalized treatment-control / participation vs. non-participation (2009-10, 2010-11) • Goal: Multi-State, large n with comparable student populations (matched, controlled) • Student Change:*Metric was percent students classified as Proficient or Advanced in respective States.

  4. Sample Participation • Systematic sample of 750 schools, in 30 States • N determined by a priori Power analysis • Schools eligible for inclusion in the sample as participating Schools met the following criteria: • More than 10 teachers total • 80% or more of teachers viewed materials • Minimum average of 90.0 minutes of viewing per teacher for the school • Districts included were only those for which eligible schools were included • Normalizing for difference in socio-economic and demographic factors between participating Schools and their Districts cumulatively as the statistical comparison group Data • Participation data were extracted from the Internet-based professional development application as surveilled • Student performance data were captured from publically available, Internet-accessed sources (school as unit of measure, percent Proficient or Advanced as metric)

  5. Exhaustive Analysis PD-360 Schools significantly outperformed their respective Districts • Math: • 11.6% Advantage in Percent Proficient (p<.001) • 19.4% Advantage in Percent Advanced (p<.001) • 13.0% Advantage for Combined Pct Prof and Adv(p<.001) • Reading: • 5.3% Advantage in Percent Proficient (p<.001) • 9.3% Advantage in Percent Advanced (p<.001) • 5.5% Advantage for Combined Pct Prof and Adv(p<.001)

  6. Math Advantages As Districts fell 6.4%, PD-360 Schools gained 5.2% for a 11.6% advantage (p<.001)

  7. Math Advantages Districts gained 14.5%, while PD-360 Schools gained 33.9% for a 19.4% advantage (p<.001)

  8. Math Advantages Districts fell 4.9%, while PD-360 Schools gained 8.2% for an 13.0% advantage* (p<.001) * Figures do not sum perfectly due to rounding

  9. Reading Advantages The Districts rose .8%, while PD-360 Schools gained 6.1% for a 5.3% advantage (p<.001)

  10. Reading Advantages Districts gained 21.2%, while PD-360 Schools gained 30.5% for a 9.3% advantage (p<.001)

  11. Reading Advantages Districts rose by 2.5%, while PD-360 Schools gained 7.9% for a 5.5% advantage* (p<.001) * Figures do not subtract perfectly due to rounding

  12. Predictors of Change inPD-360 Schools • Math predictors: • #1 – Total Users • #2 – Average Minutes Viewed • #3 – Percent of Users Viewing • Reading predictors: • #1 – Percent of Users Viewing • #2 – Registered Users Viewing • #3 – Average Minutes Viewed

More Related