1 / 38

Clock Shifts

Clock Shifts. Sourish Basu Stefan Baur Theja De Silva (Binghampton) Dan Goldbaum Kaden Hazzard. Erich Mueller Cornell University. Outline. What we want to measure A tool: Doppler free spectroscopy Capabilities Challenges Probing fermionic superfluidity near Feshbach resonance.

caesar
Télécharger la présentation

Clock Shifts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Clock Shifts Sourish Basu Stefan Baur Theja De Silva (Binghampton) Dan Goldbaum Kaden Hazzard Erich Mueller Cornell University

  2. Outline • What we want to measure • A tool: Doppler free spectroscopy • Capabilities • Challenges • Probing fermionic superfluidity near Feshbach resonance

  3. Take-Home Message • RF/Microwave spectroscopy does tell you details of the many-body state • Weak coupling -- density • Strong coupling -- complicated by final-state effects • Bimodal RF spectra in trapped Fermi gases not directly connected to pairing (trap effect) Ketterle Group: Science 316, 867-870 (2007) “Pairing without Superfluidity: The Ground State of an Imbalanced Fermi Mixture”

  4. Context: Upcoming Cold Atom Physics Profound increase in complexity Ex: modeling condensed matter systems Big Question: How to probe?

  5. What we want to know • Is the system ordered? (crystaline, magnetic, superconducting, topological order) • What are the elementary excitations? • How are they related to the elementary particles?

  6. Atomic Spectroscopy I(w) [transfer rate] E w w w0 Narrow spectral line in vacuum: in principle sensitive to details of many-body state Measured hyperfine linewidth ~ 2 Hz [PRL 63, 612, 1989] Interaction energy in Fermi gas experiments: 100 kHz Possibly very powerful

  7. Sharp Spectral lines Hyperfine spectrum: nuclear spin flips (cf. NMR) “Forbidden” optical transitions: Hydrogen 1S-2S Couple weakly to environment: influenced by interactions? Does internal structure of atom depend on many-body state? (weak coupling) (weak coupling) Line shift proportional to density [Clock Shift]

  8. Center of cloud Application -- Detecting BEC BEC Density bump Spectrum gives histogram of density Solid: condensedOpen: non-condensed Exp: (Kleppner group) PRL 81, 3811 (1998) Theory: Killian, PRA 61, 033611 (2000) [OSU connection -- Oktel]

  9. Why is density histogram useful? Optical absorption: column density obscures interesting features -- ex. Mott Plateaus -- digression

  10. Bose-Mott physics Optical lattice: Kinetic energy from hopping dominates Weak interactions: atoms delocalize -- superfluid -- Poisson number distribution Energy cost of creating particle-hole pair exceeds hopping Strong interactions: suppress hopping -- insulator

  11. Phase Diagram (lines of fixed density) Incommensurate: “extra” particles delocalize

  12. Discontinuities Cusps Wedding Cakes Trap: spatially dependent m Hard to see terraces in column densities

  13. RF Spectroscopy Exp: Ketterle group [Science, 313, 649 (2006)] Thy: Hazzard and Mueller [arXiv:0708.3657] 2 1 3 4 5 Spectral shift proportional to density Discrete bumps: density plateaus

  14. Sensitivity Significant peaks, even in superfluid Q: could this be used to detect other corrugations? FFLO? CDW?

  15. Spatially resolved Column densities

  16. So simple? Spectrum knows about more than density! Jin group [Nature 424, 47 (2003)] Ex: RF dissociation - Potassium Molecules (Thermal, non-superfluid fermionic gas) Free atoms Initially weakly bound pairs in (and free atoms in these states) pairs Drive mf=-5/2 to mf=-7/2

  17. Transfer n [kHz] Related work Ex: RF dissociation - Lithium Molecules B [Gauss] All 1+2 atoms in molecular bound state (note reversal of sign of shift) Grimm group [Science 305, 1128 (2004)]Background: Ketterle group [Science 300, 1723 (2003)

  18. What is probed by RF spectroscopy? Single Component Bose system: Excite with perturbation Final state has Hamiltonian Fermi’s Golden Rule (pseudospin susceptibility)

  19. Simple Limits I Final state does not interact (V(ab)=0) • analogous to momentum resolved tunneling (or in some limits photoemission) • probe all single particle excitations Initial: ground state Final: single a-quasihole of momentum k single free b-atom Example: BCS state -- darker = larger spectral density w w k k

  20. Simple Limits II Final state interacts same as initial (V(ab)=V(bb)), and dispersion is same • Coherent spin rotation Formally can see from X acts as ladder operator

  21. General Case -- Sum Rule Mehmet O. Oktel, Thomas C. Killian, Daniel Kleppner, L. S. Levitov, Phys. Rev. A 65, 033617 (2002) Mean clock shift Ex: Born approximation point interaction

  22. Problem Not a low energy observable!!!!!! -- dif potentials = dif results Tails dominate sum rule (unmeasurable) Pethick and Stoof, PRA 64, 013618 (2001)

  23. Summary of spectroscopy • Weak coupling • peak mostly shifted (proportional to density) • long tails (probably unobservable) • final interaction = initial • Peak sharp and unshifted • General • No simple universal picture • sum rules are ambiguous • Important for experiments on strongly interacting fermionic Lithium atoms

  24. Lithium near Feshbach resonance Innsbruck expt grp +NIST theory grp, PRL 94, 103201 (2005) Strongly interacting superfluid BCS-BEC crossover -- Randeria

  25. Outline (what is RF lineshape -- and what does it tell us) • Homogeneous lineshapes within BCS model of superfluid • Crude model for trapped gas • Highly polarized limit (normal state) • Demonstrates universality of line shape

  26. Variational Model Idea: include all excitations consisting of single quasiparticles quasiholes “coherent contribution” -- should capture low energy structure a-b pairs -- excite from b to c Neglects multi-quasiparticle intermediate states [Exact if (final int)=(initial int) or if (final it)=0]

  27. Result Bound-Free Bound-Bound Many-body

  28. Typical spectra 1-2 paired drive 2-3 1-2 paired drive 1-3 (most spectral weight is in delta function)

  29. Perali, Pieri, StrinatiarXiv:0709.0817 Experiment Ketterle group: Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 090403 (2007) Sant-Feliu update: has seen “bound-bound”

  30. Summary: Homogeneous Lineshape • Final state interactions crucial: • Is there a bound state? • Distorted spectrum if resonance in continuum • Sets scale Next: trap

  31. Inhomogeneous line shapes Most experiments show trap averaged lineshape Grimm group, Science 305, 1128 (2004) Bimodality:due to trap

  32. Where spectral weight comes from Massignan, Bruun, and Stoof, ArXiv:0709.3158 Edge of cloud Calculation in normal state: Ndown<Nup More particles at center

  33. Highly polarized limit: only one down-spin particle Generic properties Assumption: local clock shift = (homogeneous spectrum peaks there) High temp: [Virial expansion: Ho and Mueller, PRL 92, 160404 (2004)] High density: Different a

  34. Bimodality nup ndn r Center of trap: highest down-spin density -- gives broad peak Edge of trap: low density, but a lot of volume -- All contribute at same detuning -- Gives power law singularity

  35. Quantitative Nozieres and Schmidt-Rink (no adjustable params)

  36. Calculating Free Energy (Only if asked) If ndown is small, q is only function of mup and x=w-mup-mdn. Arctan vanishes for negative x [so w is large]

  37. Summary: Trap • Trap leads to bimodal spectrum (model independent) • Simple model using NSR energy: energy scales work, temp scales seem a bit off • Final state interactions: mostly scale spectrum Decreasing T/TF Decreasing a/l

  38. Summary -- Spectroscopy • Powerful probe of local properties • Density: SF-Mott • Simple when interactions are weak • Open Q’s when interactions are strong • Bimodal RF spectra are not directly related to pairing (implicit in works of Torma and Levin) Fin

More Related