1 / 3

C2 MG Review Process for C2-led Projects

C2 MG Review Process for C2-led Projects. CG Editor/Managing Editor requests full methods review for a protocol or review. MG Associate Editor/Managing Editor scans for specialized peer reviewer needs. MG Managing Editor solicits methods peer review. 1-7 days. 1-2 days. 2-4 weeks.

cais
Télécharger la présentation

C2 MG Review Process for C2-led Projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. C2 MG Review Process for C2-led Projects CG Editor/Managing Editor requests full methods review for a protocol or review MG Associate Editor/Managing Editor scans for specialized peer reviewer needs MG Managing Editor solicits methods peer review 1-7 days 1-2 days 2-4 weeks MG Associate Editor/Managing Editor notifies CG of veto 2 weeks CG Editor/Managing Editor requests in-house methods review for a protocol MG approves CG in-house review MG receives methods peer review 1 day MG vetoes CG in-house review 1-2 weeks MG Editor/Associate Editor sends peer review & action letter to CG Managing Editor

  2. Current C2 MG Review Process for CDPLPG-led Projects CDPLPG Managing Editor requests methods review from MG Editor/Associate Editor 2 weeks MG Editor/Associate Editor sends peer review to CDPLPG Managing Editor

  3. Proposed C2 MG Review Process for C1-led Projects C1 Editorial Team solicits at least one methods/statistics peer reviewer Authors R&R document based on peer review C1 provides C2 MG a copy of revised & original document & peer review comments 4 weeks C2 MG notes methods flaws: sends action letter to C1 Editorial Team & C2 CG C2 MG approves C1 methods review C2 MG notifies C1 Editorial Team & C2 CG of approval

More Related