1 / 8

Enhancing Repository and Database for Market Surveillance Authorities in the UNECE Region

This document outlines the current landscape of Market Surveillance Authorities (MSAs) across over 30 UNECE countries, including contact details, legislative references, and sector information. It explores available options for compiling this information into a coherent repository and potential database, addressing challenges such as search criteria, typologies, and data coherence. Suggestions for the way forward focus on gathering input from MARS experts to determine their needs and refine the delivery of information.

calder
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Repository and Database for Market Surveillance Authorities in the UNECE Region

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gathering information on market surveillance authorities in the UNECE region:What repository?A/What database? Pierre Kohler UNECE, Trade Division

  2. Outline • Current situation: information on market surveillance authorities (MSAs) collected so far • Available options: repository/database • Issues related to: • Compiling a repository • Building a database • Way forward Pierre Kohler, UNECE

  3. 1. Current situation Information on market surveillance authorities is available in more than 30 countries • European Commission • General: contact information for MSAs in 30 countries (+ legislative reference, sector, person in charge, etc.) NOTE: many different ways of reporting • Atex: contact information for MSAs in 31 countries • EASC/secretariat • Information for 7 countries (5 CIS countries, Brazil and Switzerland) NOTE: template respected, but not fit for a database Pierre Kohler, UNECE

  4. 2. Available options • Only a repository Question: A webpage with country sheets (// EC) or one single document? • A repository and a database Issues to be discussed in relation to the database: • Search criteria • Typologies • Template Pierre Kohler, UNECE

  5. 3.a) Compiling a repository Possibilities • Webpage with 1 document per country (EC + others) • One single and very long document • Simply merge existing documents • Provide coherence NOTE: inputs are all different and there will be many N/A QUESTION: is it really an improvement? Pierre Kohler, UNECE

  6. 3.b) Building a database • Prototype database • Countries: BLR, BRA, CHY • Available search criteria • Country • Authority (which categories?) • Sector (which categories?) • Legislative references (useful for EU, but not for non-EU) • Issues • What is needed? Which search criteria are useful to users? • Who defines categories? When? At what pace? Example of a typology for economic activities • If WP.6 needs to recollect information, it might need to prepare a new template: proposal on how to proceed? Pierre Kohler, UNECE

  7. 4. Way forward What do MARS experts need/want? What can MARS deliver? Pierre Kohler, UNECE

  8. Thank you for your attention!

More Related