1 / 17

Oil Program Statute

Used Oil Competitive Grants’ Cycle Frequency and Funding Levels (Used Oil Recycling Fund, FY 2006/07 and FY 2007/08). Oil Program Statute. Grant and Outreach Programs: Block Grants (administered annually) Competitive Grants (OG, UNP, URD) Annual award not required

caldwell-campbell
Télécharger la présentation

Oil Program Statute

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Used Oil Competitive Grants’ Cycle Frequency and Funding Levels (Used Oil Recycling Fund, FY 2006/07 and FY 2007/08)

  2. Oil Program Statute • Grant and Outreach Programs: • Block Grants (administered annually) • Competitive Grants (OG, UNP, URD) • Annual award not required • Funding is continuously appropriated - Outreach and Education

  3. Funding Framework Funding Framework: • Cycle Frequency • Funding Levels

  4. 1. Cycle Frequency • Local Program Need • Regular & predictable funding • Time to evaluate effectiveness • Three Options for Cycle Frequency: • Annual • Biennial (Board adopted Nov. 2001) • Other Cycle Options

  5. Annual Cycle: Recommended • Each grant is awarded annually • Effects are: • Most responsive to fluctuations in Fund Condition • All Stakeholders eligible for grants • Potential for overlapping grants • Lack of program evaluation • Lower funding levels for each cycle

  6. Biennial Cycle: Not Recommended • Each grant awarded every two years • Current Board model • Biennial Cycles have been successful: • Predictability • Funding flexibility • Less focus on administration, more on project management & evaluation • Does not limit available funding for local government

  7. Other Cycle Options: Not Recommended • Any cycle other than Annual/Biennial • Effects are: • Flexibility on when to award • Unpredictable cycles • Decreased administrative tasks • Funding flexibility

  8. 2. Funding Levels • Two Issues: • Total annual Competitive Grant funding • Funding amount for individual Competitive Grants

  9. Statutory Framework for Funding Levels Total Resources – Mandatory Expenses “ Remaining Balance”

  10. Statutory for Funding Levels for Grants: 60% Minimum Grant Percent of Remaining Balance OG Minimum 40% UNP Minimum 10% URD 10-15% maximum

  11. A. Total Annual Competitive Grant Funding • Other Board Options: • Increase total grant $ up to 80% • Decrease total grant $ below 60% • Preferred Option – 60% level • Prudent carry-over • Obligation to stakeholders • Facilitates local planning

  12. Funding Framework: Annual Cycles after 4 yrs • Scenario 1: No Grants in 06/07; Annual Grants Year 2 Result: 7 OG grants 1.5 NP/R&D grants • Scenario 2: Statutory Min. 06/07 Annual Grants Year 2 Result: 6 OG grants 1.5 NP/R&D grants

  13. Funding Framework: Biennial Cycles after 4 yrs • Scenario 3: Biennial 15/45/60 Result: 3.8 OG grants 6.7 NP grants 2.2 RD grants • Scenario 4: 15/15/60 Result: 6.7 OG grants 2.3 NP/R&D grants each

  14. B. Preferred Funding Framework • Annual Cycle • Defer Grant Funding until FY 2007/08 • 60% total annual limit for competitive grants • UNP = 10% of remaining balance • URD = 10% of remaining balance • OG = 40% of remaining balance • Joint Solicitation of 3 Grants • Offer Grants earlier (July-Sept)

  15. Recommended Action for Cycle Frequency & Funding Levels • Choose • Option #2 Annual Cycles beginning in FY 2007/08 • Adopt Resolution #2007-35 with revisions

More Related