1 / 16

Partnership for Peace & Euro-Atlantic Integration

This seminar explores the benefits of NATO's Partnership for Peace and Euro-Atlantic integration for Hungary and the region. It addresses questions about future status, commitments, and the roadmap for membership.

calida
Télécharger la présentation

Partnership for Peace & Euro-Atlantic Integration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Partnership for Peace & Euro-Atlantic Integration Arpad Hargita Deputy Director, NATO Departament Ministry of Foreign Affairs Hungary Szeged, 29 Januárr, 2003

  2. Why not alone? Why integration? • A small country - third way > gray zone • The eastern modell - CE, EU, NATO • Memberstates - big or small - have the same rights and perspectives (consensus) • One for all - all for one • National soveregnty and integration • Without work - no result

  3. NATO-EAPC- PfP • NATO has no enemies only partners • EAPC: framework for consultation +cooperation • PfP: pragmatic military co-operation(contribution to peacekeeping by common planning, trainig and exercises, transparency at defence planning, budgeting, democratic controll)

  4. Interest of Hungary • BH reintegrated to Regional and European structures • General conditions for stability improved • Key conditions for prosperity at place • Same level of security for the region • Accelerated integration process for BH • Lessons and experiences: do not repeat our mistakes

  5. Partnership for Peace • Security of the Euro-Atlantic area is non divisible (“grey zones”: undesirable) • Common values, common actions • Joint responsibility for peace and stability • Transparency of plans, procedures, actions • Direct link to NATO (EAPC: copy intra-Alliance co-operation) • Inclusiveness, self-differentiation

  6. Questions to be answered at the outset • Future status of the country (neutral / non aligned? allied? or?) • Purpose of PfP / EAPC membership: serve your future • Programmes to be built accordingly • Clear vision - better chance to be assisted • Decision made? Structure the steps

  7. Requirements, conditions? • Basic commitments to Euro-Atlantic values • Similarity to UN, OSCE, CEI, other regional arrangements • Supposed to serve modernisation, reforms, stability, capability building • Effects the entire state & society • No silver bullet solution! May be long way

  8. Early Hungarian Dilemmas • Neutrality? NATO membership? Third way? • To give up part of sovereignty? • Where are the enemies? • Too expensive to rebuild defence structures! • Is it an offer instead of membership? • Does it help if things go wrong in the neighbourhood?

  9. A Hungarian Roadmap • Main objective of PfP membership - vision on the future • Plan defence reform - introduce capable leaders for implantation • Introduce civil control on the military • Separate the functions of different military organisations

  10. A Hungarian Roadmap (2) • set up an interagency steering body - to guide the accession, lead the preparation, control the substance of participation, plan tasks, look after harmonisation of steps within different agencies of Government • Relevant units / departments to be identified in the Government agencies concerned • Prepare and man a mission in Brussels

  11. A Hungarian Roadmap (3) • Legal: • Review the list of laws and other legal acts to be amended or drafted • Draft a decree on the tasks (projects) to be implemented on yearly basis • Build a training programme for military, civilians, politicians, support expert teams - takes years, but can get support from abroad

  12. A Hungarian Roadmap (4) • Financial: • Allocate a budget for the projects - at least on yearly basis • Implement a planning and financing system according to PARP standards • Security • Identify the national contact point for co-operation with NATO (PfP)

  13. The Aim of the Seminar • What PfP / EAPC is good for? (Still not an Aspirin!) • Help preparing decisions on the agenda of BH • Learn from You - good for NATO, HU • To see what neighbours can use • Strengthen mutual confidence • Tasks ahead: to find solutions for open questions

  14. Any Questions ? • Thank you

  15. Security Issues To Be Dealt With- SEE • Secessions - historic justice or security issue? • National agendas or integration-approach? • Zero sum game, or win-win situation? • Relatively weak internal conflict resolution mechanism, structures, safety nets • Relatively disadvantageous economic situation • Relatively high presence of organised crime + parallel srtuctures

  16. Security Issues To Be Dealt With- SEE (cont.) • Borders open for trafficking or for cross-border co-operation? • Too many weapons, too little control • IC’s role: Correct? Mistaken? • Responsibility for building the countries - regional ownership? • Very encouraging signs • BH: very good potentials

More Related