1 / 16

Internal H0/H- dump

Internal H0/H- dump. Cesare Maglioni, Melanie Delonca Thanks to: R . Chamizo , R . Versaci, O . Aberle, J . Borburgh. Outline. Available specs S pace & layout Loading cases Preliminary analyses : Average Ambient Dose around the dump Energy Deposition Density Instantaneous DT

calix
Télécharger la présentation

Internal H0/H- dump

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Internal H0/H- dump Cesare Maglioni, Melanie Delonca Thanks to: R. Chamizo, R. Versaci, O. Aberle, J. Borburgh

  2. Outline • Available specs • Space & layout • Loading cases • Preliminary analyses : • Average Ambient Dose around the dump • Energy Deposition Density • Instantaneous DT • Transient to steady operation • Steady operation • Support / cooling proposal • Conclusions C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  3. Available specifications Chamber drawings (proposal) - 25/10/11 EDMS 1069240 31/08/10 EDMS 963395 07/10/11 + EDMS 1069244 18/06/10 EDMS 1163508 19/09/11 C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  4. Space & layout EDMS 1163508 • The flange has to be adapted to the assembly / fixation / cooling needs of the dump 185-202 mm • The instrumentation has to be fixed on the dump (front face) • The dump is one-piece with the flange (ALARA, quick exchange / disassembly) C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  5. Space & layout EDMS 963395 • No differentiation between H0 and H- loads • H- impact angle: assumed ~33mrad (J. Borburgh)  t.b.c. EDMS 1069240, 44 • The whole envelope is considered for the dump only (no shielding considered) • Proposal for a supporting structure / fixation under development C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  6. Loading cases EDMS 963395 Operation: • Three loading case (following stripping efficiency): • (1) e = 98% (foil operational) • (2) e = 90% (foil degraded) • (3) e = 0% (foil accident) • 4/4 Linac4 Beam loading case (foil accident + distributor failure) -- -- -- -- • Steady-state, 2% all H0, 0.8mA • Steady-state, 10% all H0 , 4mA, 8h max • Transient 1/4 Linac4 pulse, 40mA, 100% H- (interlock after 1 pulse) • not considered C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  7. FLUKA / Average Ambient Dose around the dump “…For boron nitride and graphite, after a few days of cooling time the dose rates are of O(10)−O(102) μSv/h, according to the location around the dump. The dose rates are a factor of 3-4 times higher for aluminum nitride…” • RP / magnet : need for shielding ? • TOP view, Equivalent Rate H*(10) (μSv/h) after 1 day cooling • SIDE view, Equivalent Rate H*(10) (μSv/h) after 1 day cooling C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  8. Energy Deposition Density 3.73 J/cm3/pulse Case (1) H- beam Half dump BOTTOM view, Energy Deposition Density for loading case (3) [J/cm3/pulse] 33mrad C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  9. Instantaneous T Half dump BOTTOM view, T due to 1/4 Linac4 pulse (3) H- beam C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  10. Transient to steady operation C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  11. Transient to steady operation (2) Foil degraded (90%, 71 W) NO cooling (2) Foil degraded (90%, 71 W) Nominal cooling C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  12. Steady operation (1) Foil operational (98%, 14.2 W) (2) Foil degraded (90%, 71 W) Half dump BOTTOM view, DT due to steady-state operation • 0.5 ÷ 3 l/min for cooling depending on the fixation chosen ~ 40 mm expansion (case 2) ~ 2 mm bending (no support, no chamber) Circulating H+ beam H0 beam C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  13. Support / cooling proposal No water feed-through  water-into-vacuum leak risk Stainless Steel plate Graphite-to-Copper brazing • Demand for careful design of the vacuum flange (weakness)? C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  14. Support / cooling proposal Copper part inserted into Steel flange Graphite-to-Copper brazing Cu-Brazing Entrance for water cooling Exit for water cooling C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  15. Conclusions • The analyses have been done based on up-to-date specs : temperatures and cooling are not an issue • In case of loading (2) + of cooling failure  temperatures increase smoothly • Induced radioactivity : need for a shielding ? • Some parameters have still to be defined: • Impact angles of beam (important for H- beam in accident, vacuum chamber, etc..): 33mrad t.b.c. • Risk of scraping the circulating H+ beam, reduced width • Dump support / fixation to vacuum flange  feedback from design /vacuum needed, careful flange design C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

  16. Thank You C.Maglioni, M.Delonca - Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection

More Related