1 / 5

Notes from Vivien Levy-Garboua, Senior Advisor at the Directorate General of BNP Paribas

EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels on 13th October 2010 ________________________________________________. Notes from Vivien Levy-Garboua, Senior Advisor at the Directorate General of BNP Paribas.

callia
Télécharger la présentation

Notes from Vivien Levy-Garboua, Senior Advisor at the Directorate General of BNP Paribas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels on 13th October 2010________________________________________________ Notes from Vivien Levy-Garboua, Senior Advisor at the Directorate General of BNP Paribas

  2. EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels on 13th October 2010________________________________________________ • Exchanges are much more competitive than they used to be need for a stable ground on which to rely. We cannot have complexity at all levels. Hence the importance of a stable framework for post trade infrastructures. • Post trade = CCP’s(+TR) EMIR • CSD’s New directive « announced » for 2011 There is a need for such a directive on CSD’s

  3. EMIR / CCP’s – EMIR goes in the right direction • CCP’s are of a systemic nature • Safety /efficiency trade off. There is no trade off – The risk part is not negociable, it can not be a « risk return » type of choice. • The Risk Management tool of a CCP is crucial. CCP’s take counterparty risk. • CCP’s should be regulated • Access to CB money intra-day / over night CCP’s should be banks CCP’s should be linked to their monetary zone • Interoperability must not be done at the expense of the risk taken A CCP must be able to refuse to deal with another CCP n>2 is very different from n=2 when you speak of interoperability • There will be a need for consolidation, on a regional basis • Intragroup transactions should not be obliged to go through a CCP : when my AM works with FI its BNP vs BNP EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels on 13th October 2010_____________________________________________________

  4. CSD’s EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels on 13th October 2010_____________________________________________________ Role n°1 : Notarial vote / Regalian Role / Central Banks for Securities. • Relation with issuers • Creation of dematerialized securities in its systems • Registration of the Securities • Control of the integrity : Supply = Demand in number of shares+ Sometimes : • Information on the life of the share (elementary Corporate Action)

  5. CSD’s Role n°2 : Settlement / DVP EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels on 13th October 2010_____________________________________________________ • DVP in CB money – Guarantee this process • Enable the circulation of securities • Guarantee the existence of securities and cash • + Sometimes : • A technical role in the lending / borrowing of securities without taking any counterparty risk. Only operational risk A CSD should not take any liquidity risk / counterparty risk – Only operational risk. The new Directive (i) should regulate this part which is « Public utility » / not for profit / Central Bank for Securities (ii) should define the conditions under which a CSD can develop other « non regalian » activities.

More Related