1 / 66

Financial Risk Management

Financial Risk Management. Zvi Wiener mswiener@mscc.huji.ac.il 02-588-3049. Financial Risk Management. Zvi Wiener Head of Finance Department The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 02-588-3049, mswiener@mscc.huji.ac.il. Ronen Midbary 03-562-9924 rmidbary@ovedgubi.com. Statistics.

calvine-jerom
Télécharger la présentation

Financial Risk Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Financial Risk Management Zvi Wiener mswiener@mscc.huji.ac.il 02-588-3049 http://pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il/~mswiener/zvi.html

  2. Financial Risk Management • Zvi Wiener • Head of Finance Department • The Hebrew University of Jerusalem • 02-588-3049, mswiener@mscc.huji.ac.il Ronen Midbary 03-562-9924 rmidbary@ovedgubi.com VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  3. Statistics • Random variables • Mean, Standard Deviation, Correlation • Normal distribution VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  4. Basic Corporate Finance • NPV, IRR, YTM • Assets, Liabilities • Regulators, Bank of Israel, MOF • ISDA, SEC VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  5. Investments • Stocks, Indices, , CAPM,  • Bonds, duration, convexity • NIS, CPI linked • callable, puttable, convertible • Forwards, Futures, Swaps • Options,  • European, American • Call, Put, BS formula • Markets: prices, volatilites, LIBORs, swap rates VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  6. Financial Risk Management Following P. Jorion, Value at Risk, McGraw-Hill Chapter 1 The Need for Risk Management http://pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il/~mswiener/zvi.html

  7. Financial Risks • Risk is the volatility of unexpected outcomes. • Business Risk • Financial Risk • Legal Risk • Operational Risk VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  8. Analytic Risk Management Tools • Duration 1938 • Markowitz mean-variance 1952 • Sharpe’s CAPM 1963 • Multiple factor models 1966 • Black-Merton-Scholes model 1973 • RAROC 1983 • Limits by duration buckets 1986 VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  9. Analytic Risk Management Tools • Risk-weighted assets (banks) 1988 • Stress Testing 1992 • Value-at-Risk, VaR 1993 • RiskMetrics 1994 • CreditMetrics 1997 • Integration of credit and market 1998- • Enterprisewide RM 2000- VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  10. Derivatives and Risk Management • Stocks and bonds are securities – issued to raise capital. • Derivatives are contracts, agreements used for risk transfer. VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  11. Financial Derivatives • Futures, Forwards, Swaps • Options • European, American, Asian, Parisian • Call, Put • Cap, Floor • Credit derivatives VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  12. Types of Financial Risks • Market Risk • Credit Risk • Liquidity Risk • Operational Risk • Legal Risk VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  13. duration, convexity volatility delta, gamma, vega rating target zone What is the current Risk? Bonds Stocks Options Credit Forex Total ? VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  14. Standard Approach VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  15. Modern Approach Financial Institution VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  16. Example • You live in Herzliya and work in Tel-Aviv. • When do you have to leave your home to be at work at 8:30? VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  17. How much can we lose? • Everything • correct, but useless answer. • How much can we lose realistically? VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  18. Definition • VaR is defined as the predicted worst-case loss at a specific confidence level (e.g. 99%) over a certain period of time. VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  19. Definition (Jorion) • VaR is the worst loss over a target horizon with a given level of confidence. VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  20. VaR1% 1% Profit/Loss VaR VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  21. VaR 1% Meaning of VaR • A portfolio manager has a daily VaR equal $1M at 99% confidence level. • This means that there is only one chance in 100 that a daily loss bigger than $1M occurs, under normal market conditions. VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  22. 1% of worst cases Returns year VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  23. Main Ideas • A few well known risk factors • Historical data + economic views • Diversification effects • Testability • Easy to communicate VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  24. value scenarios sensitivity Conventional Analysis $ Risk factor VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  25. price yield VaR approach $ Risk factor VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  26. Important • VaR is a necessary, but not sufficient procedure for controlling risk. • It must be supplemented by limits and controls, in addition to an independent risk-management function. • Sound risk-management practices. VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  27. Financial Risk Management Following P. Jorion, Value at Risk, McGraw-Hill Chapter 2 Lessons from Financial Disasters http://pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il/~mswiener/zvi.html

  28. Derivatives 1993-1995 • ($ million) • Shova Shell, Japan 1,580 • Kashima Oil, Japan 1,450 • Metallgesellschaft 1,340 • Barings, U.K. 1,330 • Codelco, Chile 200 • Procter & Gamble, US 157 VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  29. Public Funds • ($ million) • Orange County 1,640 • San Diego 357 • West Virginia 279 • Florida State Treasury 200 • Cuyahoga County 137 • Texas State 55 VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  30. Barings • February 26, 1995 • 233 year old bank • 28 year old Nick Leeson • $1,300,000,000 loss • bought by ING for $1.5 VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  31. Metallgesellshaft • 14th largest industrial group • 58,000 employees • offered long term oil contracts • hedge by long-term forward contracts • short term contracts were used (rolling hedge) • 1993 price fell from $20 to $15 • $1B margin call in cash VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  32. Orange County • Bob Citron, the county treasures • $7.5B portfolio (schools, cities) • borrowed $12.5B, invested in 5yr. notes • interest rates increased • reported at cost - big mistake! • realized loss of $1.64B VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  33. Daiwa • 12-th largest bank in Japan • September 1995 • Hidden loss of $1.1B accumulated over 11 years • Toshihide Igushi, trader in New York • Had control of front and back offices • In 92 and 93 FED warned Daiwa about bad management structure. VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  34. VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  35. Big Losses • Bank Negara, Malaysia $3B 92 • Banesto (Spain’s 5th bank) $4.7B 93 • Credit Lyonnais $15B 94 • S&L short deposits, long loans $150 80s • Japan $550 90s VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  36. Responses • G-30 report • DPG = Derivatives Policy Group, risk.ifci.ch • JPMorgan’s RiskMetrics www.riskmetrics.com • GARP www.garp.com • PRMIA www.prmia.org • GAO = General Accounting Office, www.gao.gov/reports.htm • FASB FAS 133 www.fas133.com, FAS 107 • IASC, IAS 39 www.iasc.org.uk • SEC = Securities and Exchange Commission • www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-7386.txt VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  37. Financial Risk Management Following P. Jorion, Value at Risk, McGraw-Hill Chapter 3 Regulatory Capital Standards with VaR http://pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il/~mswiener/zvi.html

  38. Why regulation? • Externalities • Deposit insurance • Moral hazard – less incentives to control risk • Basel Accord 1988 • measure of solvency = Cooke ratio VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  39. Cooke ratio • The Basel Accord requires capital to be at least 8% of the total risk-weighted assets of the bank. • Capital definition is broad: • Tier 1. Stocks, reserves (retained earnings) ( 50%) • Tier 2. Perpetual securities, undisclosed reserves, subordinated debt >5 years. VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  40. Weights Asset Type • 0% Cash • Claims on OECD central government • local currency claims on central banks • 20% Cash to be received • OECD banks and regulated securities firms • non-OECD banks below 1 year • multilateral development banks • foreign OECD public sector entities • 50% residential mortgage loans VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  41. Weights Asset Type • 100% Claims on private sector (corp. debt, equity…) • Claims on non-OECD banks above 1 year • Real estate • Plant and equipment • At national discretion • 0-50% Claims on domestic OECD public-sector entities • OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development): Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, UK, Japan, Finland, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Czech Republic, Hungary, Korea and Poland. VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  42. Credit Risk Charge VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  43. Activity Restrictions • Restrictions on large risks (over 10% of capital) • must be reported • over 25% prohibited • total of large risks can not exceed 8*capital VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  44. Criticism of 1988 Approach • Regulatory arbitrage (securitization) • Credit derivatives • Inadequate differentiation of credit risks • Non-recognition of term structure effect • Non-recognition of risk mitigation • Non-recognition of diversification • Non-recognition of market risk VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  45. Market Risk Amendment 1996 • Trading book – financial instruments that intentionally held for short-term resale and are typically marked-to-market • Banking book – other instruments, like loans. • TRC = CRC + MRC • Tier 3 capital: short-term subordinated debt (must be less than 2.5*Tier1) VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  46. The Standardized Model • Maturity bands • Partial netting • Duration weights • No diversification across risks VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  47. The Internal Models Approach • Quantitative parameters for VaR • 10 business days or 2 weeks • 99% confidence level • at least one year of historical data updated at least quarterly • Treatment of correlations – can be recognized VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  48. 1 day can be scaled by square root of 10 • Typically average times k is used. • k initially is set to 3, but later it can be increased • Specific Risk Charge SRC is added. VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  49. Basel Rules MRC • Market Risk Charge = MRC • SRC - specific risk charge, k 3. VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

  50. Backtesting • Verification of Risk Management models. • Comparison if the model’s forecast VaR with the actual outcome - P&L. • Exception occurs when actual loss exceeds VaR. • After exception - explanation and action. VaR-PJorion-Ch1-3

More Related