1 / 24

NSAA Annual Meeting June 6, 2008

NSAA Annual Meeting June 6, 2008. NSAA EXCELLENCE IN ACCOUNTABILITY AWARDS Performance Audit of MASS TRANSIT AGENCIES OF NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS: RTA, CTA, METRA, AND PACE. NSAA Annual Meeting June 6, 2008. Challenges:. Four distinct, large entities

cameron-norman
Télécharger la présentation

NSAA Annual Meeting June 6, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NSAA Annual Meeting June 6, 2008 NSAA EXCELLENCE IN ACCOUNTABILITY AWARDS Performance Audit of MASS TRANSIT AGENCIES OF NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS: RTA, CTA, METRA, AND PACE NSAA Annual Meeting June 6, 2008

  2. Challenges: • Four distinct, large entities • CTA: $ 1.2 billion – buses and rail • Metra: $ 504 million – commuter rail • Pace: $ 160 million – suburban buses • RTA: $ 708 million – much $ passed to 3 service boards, and responsible for overall governance 2

  3. Challenges: • Largely open-ended scope • Technical areas, such as pensions, transit operations, construction, etc. • Under intense public scrutiny • 200 miles away from Springfield Office 3

  4. What we did: • Identified need for additional assistance – • Used public accounting firms doing financial audits of the 4 agencies to assist in personnel and contract testing. • Obtained additional assistance from contractors with expertise in bus and rail transit, pensions, and financial operations. 4

  5. What we did: • Divided the agencies into 12 functional areas, such as financial management, revenue, capital program, pensions, and an operations chapter on each of the 4 entities • Looked at same issues across the agencies • Really never had the issue arise that “you’re picking on me” or looking at me differently than the other 3 agencies. 5

  6. What we did: • Benchmarking: Key objective was to measure their performance. • Had to be careful when comparing the 4 agencies against each other – different population densities served, different transportation modes, etc. • Decided to use other transit agencies in the U.S. for peer comparisons 6

  7. What we did: • Benchmarking: • Used National Transit Database data • Kept changing – quite a challenge in referencing the report • Put disclosures in the report about the data, as well as the selection and limitations of peer comparisons 7

  8. Exhibit 4-10 METRA OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER MILE Exhibit 3-14 CTA RAIL OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER MILE Exhibit 5-20 PACE OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER MILE

  9. Exhibit 6-28 PACE BUS PAY/BENEFITS AS A PERCENT OF TOTAL OPERATING COSTS

  10. What we did: • Made extensive use of Exhibits to make matters presented in the report more understandable and the report itself more visually appealing to users 10

  11. Exhibit 7-4 CONTRIBUTION AMOUNTS AND FUNDED PERCENTAGE FOR THE RETIREMENT PLAN FOR CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY EMPLOYEES 2000-2006

  12. Exhibit 8-8 CTA BASE FARE COMPARED TO INFLATION-INDEXED FARE Source: IMG from CTA fare information and CPI-U for the Chicago metropolitan area

  13. 15

  14. Impact: • Acceptance by agencies and actions taken on47 recommendations • All 4 agencies issued press releases the day the audit was released supporting the audit • May 2008 RTA letter 18

  15. Impact: • Very positively reported on by the press • Many editorials • Extensive TV coverage; Auditor General’s 2nd press conference in 15 years 21

  16. Impact: • Enactment of PA 95-708. Addressed many of the overall issues raised in the audit: • Strengthened the governing powers of the RTA • Improved planning and service coordination 22

  17. Impact: • Addressed the CTA’s pension and retiree health issue by granting authority to issue POBs. • Gives Auditor General new responsibilities in reviewing pension obligation bond sale, as well as determining whether contribution rates by both the CTA and employees are adequate 23

  18. NSAA Annual Meeting June 6, 2008 NSAA EXCELLENCE IN ACCOUNTABILITY AWARDS Performance Audit of MASS TRANSIT AGENCIES OF NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS: RTA, CTA, METRA, AND PACE NSAA Annual Meeting June 6, 2008

More Related