1 / 15

How to write a good TERms of reference foR for Evaluation

How to write a good TERms of reference foR for Evaluation . Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo. Presentation format . Introduction Definitions explored Logframe and Evaluation Link between Logframe and Evaluation Criteria Components of ToR

candace
Télécharger la présentation

How to write a good TERms of reference foR for Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How to write a good TERms of reference foR for Evaluation Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 PinkyMashigo

  2. Presentation format • Introduction • Definitions explored • Logframe and Evaluation • Link between Logframe and Evaluation Criteria • Components of ToR • Summary – Reminder for emphasis

  3. INTRODUCTION • Terms of Reference in general provides a guide towards results that can be used for decision making, planning and learning • The theme today is EVALUATION • There is a tendency to use certain terms inter-changeably or linked without acknowledging that they all mean different things to different people • If terms are used in this manner they tend to confuse outcomes, outputs expected from the study, project purpose, etc.

  4. Introduction cont’d • In order to avoid the confusion, it best we define these terms: • These are Monitoring, Evaluation and Audits

  5. DEFINITIONS

  6. DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN THE THREE • Monitoring: Ongoing analysis of (project) progress towards achieving planned results, with the purpose of improving management decision making • Evaluation: systematic collection and analysis of data to ascertain efficiency, effectiveness, impact, relevance and sustainability of project, programme, policy, etc. • Audit: • analysis of the legality and regularity of project expenditure & income, ie. Compliance with the laws & regulation • analysis whether funds have been used efficiently and economically in accordance with sound financial management • whether the project funds have been effectively used for the purpose intended

  7. LOGFRAME AND EVALUATION • Having understood the difference – focus is how to write a good Terms of Reference for an Evaluation exercise • Key to any evaluation is the Results Chain (Logic Model) Or Logframe • Logframe guides in terms of what kind of an evaluation and what kind of results are expected

  8. Link between evaluation Criteria IMPACT IMPACT OUTCOMES EFFECTIVENESS OUTPUTS SUSTAINABILITY ACTIVITIES EFFICIENCY MEANS RELEVANCE PROBLEMATIC SITUATION LOGFRAMEOBJECTIVE EVALUATIONCRITERIA

  9. Evaluation cont’d • Therefore, Terms of Reference must reflect what you want to achieve/intent • The ToR is stage 1 of the evaluation process, which is very key: • Who should design the ToR, all stakeholder involved in the project, policy to be evaluated

  10. Components of ToR • Background and Rationale (Introduction) • Purpose/Objective of the study • What is the focus of the evaluation • How will the results be used/utilised • Target (primary and secondary users) • Timeframe 3. Issues to be studied – Define scope • Mid-term • End • Ex – Post • Guide the evaluator in terms of focus, expectation, target group, utilisation of results

  11. Components of ToR cont’d 4. What are the assumptions and risks 5. Plan of Work – Evaluation design • Methodology of the study (provide guide) • Secondary or primary • Survey (what type) • Quasi experimental • Importance: guide on costs, implications and link back to the purpose. Can it be achieved! (a). Data elements – sources for collection; define method and tools to collect data (b). Data analysis - what method will be used, what tools can be used (c). Stakeholders – who should be consulted

  12. Components of ToR cont’d 5. Expertise Required Team members: • Define competencies, experience & skills • If required define qualifications as well Composition of the team • Number • Language where required

  13. Components of ToR cont’d 6. Reporting • Language of the report • Date of delivery • Number of copies required (recipients) • Type of reports (recipients) and timelines • Inception • Data analysis report • Ist draft • 2nd draft • Final report

  14. Components of ToR cont’d 7. Administration and Logistical Support • Management of the evaluation, who is responsible for what • Define all the support to be provided to the evaluator (define boundaries) 8. Time Schedule • Duration of the study 9. Indicative Budget

  15. SUMMARY • Of Importance: • Level of evaluation (efficiency, effectiveness, impact & sustainability) • Purpose • ToR • Issues to be studied • Team • Indicative budget • Respondent to the ToR, should be given a chance to ask questions for clarification, correction, etc. Prior to the proposal being submitted

More Related