1 / 5

Annotated Bibliography Assignment

Evaluation Methodologies for International Development. Annotated Bibliography Assignment. Tim Slade 4.27.2009 PA 546.

cardea
Télécharger la présentation

Annotated Bibliography Assignment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation Methodologies for International Development Annotated Bibliography Assignment Tim Slade 4.27.2009 PA 546

  2. Cherp, A., George, C., & Kirkpatrick, C. (2004). A methodology for assessing national sustainable development strategies. Environment and Planning C: Government Policy, 22, 913-926. • Created and tested NSDS assessment methodology • 5 Key Principles, 4 criteria each • 4-pt. qualitative assessment tool (for use by non-specialists) • Case studies of Belarus & Slovakia

  3. Conlin, Sean, and Roderick L Stirrat. "Current Challenges in Development Evaluation." Evaluation 14, no. 2 (2008): 193- 208. • Until ‘90s, “project model” of development predominated • Primary focus on ‘deliverables’, not impact • New trends: • “Managing for results” • Partnerships between donors and countries • SWAPs (Sector-wide approaches) • Outsized influence of trade, investment, other econ. activities

  4. Liverani, Andrea, and Hans E Lundgren. "Evaluation Systems in Development Agencies." Evaluation 13, no. 2 (2007): 241-256. • Evolution of evaluation systems in OECD member countries • Based on peer reviews by Development Assistance Committee (OECD) • Main finding: Evaluators given more tasks, no increase in capacity • Important areas: • Capacity constraints ( outsourcing) ; • Integration vs. independence • Knowledge management systems

  5. Jacobs, Colin. "Evaluating the Comprehensive Development Framework in Kyrgyz Republic, Central Asia." Evaluation 11, no. 4 (2005): 480- 495. • Research based on interim findings of a process evaluation of the CDF • Two goals: • how can M&E be incorporated to improve poverty-alleviation through the CDF; • Describe the development of a participatory methodology rooted in community interests

More Related