1 / 19

Shipboard Cable Trays

Shipboard Cable Trays. 07/24/19 Atlanta, GA. David Breton - (207) 442-1042. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for Public Release. A g enda. Mission Statement Project Participants Completion Summary Advantages/Challenges Task Descriptions Task Updates Schedule

cardea
Télécharger la présentation

Shipboard Cable Trays

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Shipboard CableTrays 07/24/19 Atlanta,GA David Breton - (207)442-1042 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for PublicRelease

  2. Agenda • MissionStatement • ProjectParticipants • CompletionSummary • Advantages/Challenges • TaskDescriptions • Task Updates • Schedule • First QuarterStatus • Next Steps Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  3. MissionStatement Determine and demonstrate how cable tray technologies can be integrated into ship design to expedite cable installation, reduce safety incidents, and improve first timequality Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  4. ProjectParticipants • BIW • Dave Breton – Project TechnicalLead • Alex Herbert • ATI • Nick Laney – BusinessManager • NASSCO • Paul Hengst –TPOC • HII • Jason Farmer –PTR • Laboratory • TBD • NAVSEA • ChristopherNemarich Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  5. Primary Activity List CompletionSummary • Collect cable installation data – 40%complete • Assess cable tray products – 20%complete • Design demonstrator units – 10%complete • Construct demonstrator units – 0%complete • Conduct a pilot demonstration of a cable tray installation and corresponding cable installation – 0%complete • Conduct time study by measuring the performance of a cable installation – 0% complete • Conduct demonstrator shock testing – 0%complete • Perform a cost benefit assessment – 0%complete • Recommend a technology transition plan – 0%complete Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  6. Advantages/Challenges • Advantages • Install cable tray with other infrastructure; come back to install cable (minimal access issue) • Easier to make changes to cableinstall • May offer protection tocables • Challenges • Weight • Space • Product qualification (needs to bedefined) • Watertight bulkhead interfaces may take the place of traditional transit blocksystems • Increases options for cables and conductor installation (may not need water blocked cable) https://www.google.com/search?q=shipboard+composite+cable+tray&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&s a=X&ved=2ahUKEwjk4rfFpITfAhUvw1kKHQjtDWMQsAR6BAgAEAE&biw=1347&bih=900#imgrc=QVqBYtKU dtpldM:&spf=1543861988628 Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  7. Primary Activity ListDescription • Collect cable installation data,including • Time charged to cable installation per ship zone and cablecategory • Types and number of injuries associated with cablepulling • Hours and types of rework associated with cable pulling • Assess cable tray products that are immediately available for use, or products that may require certain levels of qualification foruse • Design and construct demonstratorunits • Conduct a pilot demonstration of a cable tray installation and corresponding cableinstallation https://www.google.com/search?q=composite+electrical+duct&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj80qSSiZjUAhVL6IMKHSbfAR8QsAQIQw&biw=1280& bih=855 https://www.google.com/search?q=composite+conduit&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiG656Th5jUAhVI74MKHRKXBUEQsAQIZA&biw=1280&bih=8 55&dpr=1 Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  8. Primary Activity ListDescription • Conduct time study by measuring the performance of a cable installation with respect to: • Hours required forinstallation • Reduction of safetyexposures • Assisting devices that can beused • Cable damage that isincurred • Perform a cost benefit assessment comparing current processes versus other cable tray installations • Recommend a technology transition plan where feasible & introduce cable tray products to ship designs From MP huskyCatalog Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  9. TaskUpdates • Collect cable installation data – 40%complete • Assess cable tray products – 20%complete • Design demonstrator units – 10%complete • Construct demonstrator units – 0%complete • Conduct a pilot demonstration of a cable tray installation and corresponding cable installation – 0%complete • Conduct time study by measuring the performance of a cable installation – 0% complete • Conduct demonstrator shock testing – 0%complete • Perform a cost benefit assessment – 0%complete • Recommend a technology transition plan – 0%complete Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  10. Collect Cable InstallationData • Cable hangar, cable pulling injurydata • BIW Shipyard Electrician related injury & ergonomicdata • Injury data has been reviewed and summarized into majorcategories • Researching industry averages forcomparison • NASSCO – data collection in process using various cable traysystems • Cable installationdata • Shipyard data has been collected, and is beingorganized • Shipyard data beingreviewed • Navy Standard cable hangingsystems • Commercial cable hangingsystems • Differences in installation being considered to support data analysis andcomparison • Complexity ofinstallation • Performanceneeds Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  11. TaskUpdates • Collect cable installation data – 40%complete • Assess cable tray products – 20%complete • Design demonstrator units – 10%complete • Construct demonstrator units – 0%complete • Conduct a pilot demonstration of a cable tray installation and corresponding cable installation – 0%complete • Conduct time study by measuring the performance of a cable installation – 0% complete • Conduct demonstrator shock testing – 0%complete • Perform a cost benefit assessment – 0%complete • Recommend a technology transition plan – 0%complete Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  12. Assess Cable TrayProducts • Data collection from various vendors forassessment • Eaton, B‐Line • Legrand • MPHusky • Research Tool &Die • Seasafe • Snaketray • RICO Cable‐layingsystems • Thomas&Betts • Captrad CableSystems • Samtan EngineeringCorp. Eaton B‐Line CatalogPhoto http://www.cooperindustries.com/content/dam/public/bline/ Resources/Library/catalogs/cable_tray_systems/all_products/I ntroduction.pdf SamtanEngineering http://www.samtanengineering.com/id17.html Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  13. TaskUpdates • Collect cable installation data – 40%complete • Assess cable tray products – 20%complete • Design demonstrator units – 10%complete • Construct demonstrator units – 0%complete • Conduct a pilot demonstration of a cable tray installation and corresponding cable installation – 0%complete • Conduct time study by measuring the performance of a cable installation – 0% complete • Conduct demonstrator shock testing – 0%complete • Perform a cost benefit assessment – 0%complete • Recommend a technology transition plan – 0%complete Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  14. Design DemonstratorUnits • PreliminaryDesign • Concepts have been generated and are beingassessed • Looking to integrate the withstand‐demonstrator for shock testing into the installation‐assessment demonstrator for time trialstudy • Met with production and have determined the preliminary demonstrator manufacturingplan • Currently securing materials for demonstrator based on preliminarydesigns Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  15. Project Schedule ‐Overview ID TaskName Start Finish Duration Qtr 2,2020 Apr Qtr 4,2019 Oct Qtr 1,2020 Jan Qtr 3,2019 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Nov Dec Feb Mar Thu5/16/19 Fri5/24/19 7days 1 NASSCO Initial SOW Meeting andISA 5/20 0days 7 Mon5/20/19 Mon5/20/19 Project Kickoffmeeting 3days 8 Wed5/29/19 Mon6/3/19 Initial PlanDevelopment 1day 12 Mon5/20/19 Mon5/20/1 Internal Projectkickoff 1day 14 Mon5/20/19 Mon5/20/1 NASSCO tasking 23days 17 Sat6/1/19 Wed7/3/19 Gather and Analyze Installation Data on Muliple Ship Programs - TASK#1 40days 22 Mon7/1/19 Mon8/26/1 Research Industry Cable Tray Products - Task#2 65days 26 Mon7/1/19 Tue10/1/19 Design and Build Demonstrator for Installation Assessment - Task#3 44days 37 Sun9/1/19 Fri11/1/19 Design and Build Demonstrator for Withstand Assessments - Task#4 14days 43 Mon12/2/19 Thu12/19/1 Analyze Install and Testing Data - Task#5 14days 46 Wed1/1/20 Tue1/21/20 Cost Benefit Analysis - Task#6 172days 48 Wed7/10/19 Wed3/18/20 Create Report - Task#8 145days 57 Sat6/1/19 Fri1/3/20 Communications - Task#9 Fri11/1/19 Tue3/31/20 100days 60 Panel Meetings - Task#10 Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  16. Project Schedule – Tasks 1, 2, 3 ID TaskName Start Finish Duration Wed 7/3/19 23days Qtr 4,2019 Oct Qtr 3,2019 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Nov Dec 17 Gather and Analyze Installation Data on Muliple Ship Programs - TASK#1 Sat6/1/19 Determine representative demonstrator design Requirements Sat6/1/19 Thu 6/13/19 10days 18 Assessrecordsforcableinstallationtimefora particular design zone (mains andlocals) Fri6/14/19 Wed 7/3/19 14days 19 Assess data for safety incidents during cable pulling Fri6/14/19 Assess data for rework due tocabledamage Fri6/14/19 22 Research Industry Cable Tray Products - Task #2 Mon7/1/19 Mon 7days 6/24/19 20 Mon 7days 6/24/19 21 Mon8/26/1 40 days Gather information on light weight cable tray products along certain criteria (dimensional, weight, material,availability) Mon7/1/19 Mon 8/5/19 25days 23 Evaluateproductsandselectupto3productsto further investigate anddemonstrate Tue8/6/19 Mon 8/26/19 15days 24 ResearchandassessmultiplecabletypesforpullingTue8/6/19 Mon 8/26/19 15days 25 withstand capability; select a cross section that would be considered candidates for cable trayuse 26 Design and Build Demonstrator for Installation Assessment - Task#3 Mon7/1/19 Tue10/1/1965days Mon 10days 7/15/19 Design demonstrator to evaluate the installation performance for cable trays versus standard practice using hangers; generate performance metrics and evaluationsheets Mon7/1/19 27 Create installation drawings, representing the demonstrator, the general practice cable andhanger installation, and the proposed cable trayinstallation Tue7/16/19 Mon 7/29/19 10days 28 Installation DemonstratorMaterials Tue7/30/19 Fri 8/23/19 19 days 29 Wed 8/7/19 7days Fri 8/16/19 7days Develop materials list forpurchase Tue7/30/19 30 PurchaseMaterials Thu8/8/19 31 Fri 8/23/19 5 days Fri 8/23/19 0 days Mon 9/9/19 10days MaterialsShipping Mon8/19/19 32 8/23 MaterialsReceived Fri8/23/19 33 Build / Modifyinstallation demonstrator Mon8/26/19 34 Use existing cable and hanger installation practices; Tue9/10/19 Thu 9/19/19 8days 35 measureperformance Useproposedcabletrayandmethods;measure performance Fri9/20/19 Tue 10/1/19 8days 36 Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  17. First QuarterStatus • Project is about 30 days behind due to a latestart • Have pulled some tasking to the left, such as preliminary vendor engagement and productassessment • Have a plan to get the project back on schedule within a month Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  18. NextSteps • Finalize the demonstrator design • Best configuration /arrangement • Determine how many vendor‐sets to test • Define representative design fortesting • Secure all materials • Vendor cabletray • Demonstrator‐buildmaterials • Test plandevelopment • Cable tray installationevaluation • Cable‐run evaluation DemonstratorFacility (BIW Orion TrainingBuilding) Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

  19. Shipboard CableTrays NSRPETP Refer to Title Page for DistributionStatement

More Related