1 / 33

Delaying surgery

Delaying surgery. Pre-operative assessment and investigations. Overview. This talk will look at: Medical conditions whose investigation and optimisation may require a delay of surgery, and the indications for this.

carina
Télécharger la présentation

Delaying surgery

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Delaying surgery • Pre-operative assessment and investigations

  2. Overview • This talk will look at: • Medical conditions whose investigation and optimisation may require a delay of surgery, and the indications for this. • Other factors that may have the same effect (location, timing of surgery, availability of beds). • Options for information gathering and ongoing quality control.

  3. Objectives • “Peace in our time”

  4. Objectives • Consistency where possible in the perioperative management of medical conditions that have the potential to delay surgery. • An understanding of the risks associated with these conditions in the perioperative period. • Consultation with surgical services on these issues.

  5. Importance of adequate preoperative workup • Many conditions, if left uncorrected, pose a serious risk of perioperative morbidity or mortality. • At times this may require a delay or cancellation of surgery for optimisation.

  6. AIMS Review • Kluger et al. Inadequate pre-operative evaluation and preparation: a review of 197 reports from the Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 1173-1178. • 726 of the first 6271 incidents reported to AIMS • 197 had clear issues with assessment • 10% had not been seen • “Unpreventable” incidents made up only 5% of cases

  7. Guiding principles • Patient safety is the primary concern • Often no clear guidelines so need to consider risk vs benefit • Optimisation vs urgency of surgery • Will the investigation or review change management?

  8. Medical Conditions that may cause a delay of surgery

  9. Overview • Cardiac • Respiratory • Electrolyte disturbances • Anticoagulation • Diabetes • Anaemia and perioperative blood transfusion

  10. Cardiac conditions • Ischaemic heart disease: • AHA 2007 “Active Cardiac Conditions for which the patient should undergo evaluation and treatment before elective noncardiac surgery” (Table 2)

  11. Cardiac conditions continued • Heart failure: Associated with a substantially increased risk and should be optimised before surgery (AHA 2007). • Perioperative arrhythmias: Should be controlled preoperatively as surgery and anaesthesia can cause marked deterioration • Preoperative pacing indicated for symptomatic 1st degree heart block ; 2nd and 3rd degree heart block; slow rates unresponsive to drugs

  12. Valvular disease • AHA Guidelines (2007) • Severe AS poses the greatest risk. Then look at patient’s symptoms: • Asymptomatic: Requires evaluation of valve if none in past 1 year • Symptomatic: Requires valve replacement (delay surgery) • If valve not replaced perioperative mortality approximately 10% • Patients with valve disease severe enough to warrant surgical treatment should have valve surgery before elective noncardiac surgery

  13. Pacemakers and implantable defibrillators • Should have been checked in the last 6 months. Make sure all important information is available and documented. • Know type and response to magnets • ECG

  14. Pulmonary hypertension • Defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure >25mmHg • >35mmHg = severe • RVF if >50mmHg • Recent patient: 51 year-old male with MPAP >70mmHg • For vascath + bilateral inguinal hernia repairs • Options are: Do at DBH, delay and transfer, or cancel surgery.

  15. Hypertension • No absolute contraindications to surgery. • AHA 2007: SBP>180mmHg and DBP>100mmHg are not independent predictors of increased risk of perioperative complications. • Need to consider risk vs. benefit of delaying surgery in these cases • No evidence that it is beneficial to delay surgery if hypertension mild or moderate and no associated metabolic or cardiovascular abnormalities. • RPAH: Ideally want <140/90; consider referral for optimisation if >160/100

  16. RPAH Guidelines • “All patients should have their cardiac disease optimised prior to surgery.” • If cardiac history/condition is unclear or are concerned => cardiology referral. • Echo for • Significant uninvestigated murmur • Marked SOBOE (without another explanation) • Incompletely compensated cardiac failure • Stents: No elective surgery for 6-12 weeks after insertion unless continuing on antiplatelet therapy • History of CVA: Asymptomatic with >70% stenosis require intervention. History of stroke => find and correct cause.

  17. Respiratory conditions • AHA 2007 • Patients with obstructive or restrictive disease are at increased risk of perioperative complications. • May be justified in investigating if significant pulmonary disease is suspected: functional capacity, response to bronchodilators, CO2 retention (ABG analysis). • Infection = treat with antibiotics.

  18. Respiratory Conditions • Oxford Handbook • If surgery does not involve the abdominal or chest cavities, even patients with severe respiratory disease are at low risk for serious postoperative pulmonary complications • Spirometry does not predict pulmonary complications even in patients with COPD. “No spirometric values should be viewed as prohibitive for surgery.” • Respiratory tract infections: Patients with RTIs causing fever and cough (with or without chest signs on lung auscultation) should not undergo elective surgery under GA due to increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. • Simple coryza does not equal increased risk of postoperative complications unless pre-existing respiratory disease or are undergoing major abdominal or thoracic surgery • Children with recent or acute RTIs are more likely to suffer transient postoperative hypoxaemia (especially if intubated)

  19. Electrolyte disturbances • Consider causes • Consider implications of deranged levels • Rate of change is often more significant than absolute level in determining urgency of correction

  20. Sodium • Hyponatraemia: Postpone elective surgery if Na<120mmol/L or symptomatic • Rapid correction carries risk of central pontine demyelinosis • Optimum rate of correction unknown but around 0.5-2 mmol/hr suggested • Hypernatraemia: Postpone elective surgery if Na>150mmol/L

  21. Potassium • Hypokalaemia • Arrhythmias, myocardial dysfunction, muscle weakness (case reports of respiratory failure) rhabdomyolysis, renal i.e. can cause dysfunction in many organ systems. • Chronic mild hypo (3-3.5) without ECG changes does not appear to substantially increase anaesthetic risk • Hyperkalaemia: Always treat if >6-6.5 or ECG changes • Oxford Handbook: “Do not consider elective surgery.”

  22. Diabetes • AHA 2007 • Raised intraoperative BSL is an important predictor of morbidity and mortality. • Stroke, MI, death increased by 3-4x if pre-op BSL >11.1mmol/L (study was in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, i.e. known disease) • Exact target unclear but say <8.3mmol/L is satisfactory. • American College of Endocrinology 2003 • BSL not greater than 10

  23. Anticoagulation • The Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy. American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133:299 –339S. • Recommend INR be managed to <1.5 before surgery • For urgent surgery: If surgery can be delayed by 18-24h, 2.5-5mg of vitamin K can be effective. If more urgent (<12h), recommend FFP (or other prothrombin concentrate) in addition to vitamin K.

  24. Anaemia and perioperative blood transfusion • Lack of clear guidelines but transfusion thresholds probably lower than those used. • AHA 2007: “A conservative approach to transfusion is warranted.” • Consider cause of anaemia

  25. Other sources • Oxford Handbook: “There is no absolute level of haemoglobin at which transfusion of red cells is appropriate for all patients.” • Classifies by loss of circulating blood volume (15-30%: Unlikely unless indicated by comorbidities; >30%: transfusion probably required) • Suggests Hb<100 is not an indication but Hb<70 almost always is. • British Journal of Haematology 2001: Guidelines for the clinical use of red cell transfusions • Source used for Oxford Handbook guidelines • No definite Hb level; no transfusion back to “normal” pre-operative Hb • No clear guidelines for Hb between 70 and 100

  26. Other factors that may lead to delay of surgery

  27. Location of surgery • Patients with stents (especially DES): Given the high risk of reinfarction if antiplatelet drugs are stopped, should the surgery be performed in a centre where a new stent can be inserted if they infarct? • Other indications for tertiary referral: CPB, neurological, some paediatric surgery, PAH.

  28. Bed availability • Availability of ICU/HDU beds: Patient may need transfer for this reason alone. • Paediatric ICU: None at DBH so will need transfer.

  29. Social and geographical issues • Does the patient have somewhere appropriate to go after discharge? • Availability of doctors in remote areas for follow-up of these patients.

  30. AwAITING INFORMATION • Awaiting old notes • Awaiting relevant blood results • This issue exacerbated by lack of electronic records. Electronic record keeping can contain: • Previous discharge summaries • Clinic letters and investigations (e.g. echo reports) • Anaesthetic clinic letters

  31. Information gathering and quality control

  32. Communication with surgical teams • Cosgrove et al. Decreasing delays in urgent and expedited surgery in a university teaching hospital through audit and communication between peri-operative and surgical directorates. Anaesthesia 2008;63(6):599-603. • Prospective audit over a 5 month period. Looked at reasons for delay in surgery. • Results communicated to all concerned and then re-audited. No other intervention.

  33. Fin

More Related