1 / 33

Office of National Response Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance

Office of National Response Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Overview of TAA ETA-563 Report TAPR / WISPR ATAAAR TAA Funding Formula. WHAT IS TAA?.

carla-sloan
Télécharger la présentation

Office of National Response Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Office of National ResponseDivision of Trade Adjustment Assistance

  2. TABLE OF CONTENTS • Overview of TAA • ETA-563 Report • TAPR / WISPR • ATAAAR • TAA Funding Formula

  3. WHAT IS TAA? • Trade Adjustment Assistance Helps Individuals Who Have Become Unemployed As A Result Of Competition From Foreign Trade • Program Goals: • Encourage The Rapid Reemployment Of TAA-Eligible Individuals • Provide Training And Income Support Where Necessary For A Worker To Achieve Reemployment • Assist Individuals To Obtain Reemployment In Fields Where They Are Likely To Remain Employed And Earn Wages Comparable To Their Prior Jobs

  4. TAA CERTIFICATIONS FY 2006

  5. ETA - 563 • Tracks Current Participants In The TAA Program: Quarterly Report • Fields Are Used To Comply With Data Requests From Congress, Government Agencies, And To Project Future Budget Allocations • Participation Counts Form A Significant Component Of Base Allocations And Reserve Fund Requests

  6. ETA - 563 • ETA – 563 Is A FY Report (Oct – Sept) • Revised Report Format (TEGL 23-06) • Report E-mailed ToTaa.Reports@dol.Gov • Excel Format Only

  7. 9,522 WA 528 2,320 103 4,306 MT ME ND MN 1,618 7,258 VT OR 2,861 NH 899 10,045 8,507 1,815 Id WI 13,232 MA 2,258 20,574 SD 3,912 26 NY RI MI CT WY 21,373 3,532 6,691 1,328 PA IA NJ 18,306 NE OH 624 2,777 796 13,829 1,024 16,740 NV MD DE 30,717 In 3,442 UT IL 2,684 CA CO WY 4,913 6,806 10,581 7,999 KS VA MO KY 39,849 15,583 NC TN 6,190 3,538 398 Ok 5,878 AZ 17,697 Nm AR SC 16,947 10,497 GA 5,163 Al MS 14,479 980 TX LA 1,017 AK 3,685 FL 150 HI FY 2004 – FY 2006:EST. 387,755 WORKERSTRADE CERTIFIED 0 to 5,000 5,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 15,000 15,001 to 20,000 20,001 to 40,000 Number of Workers is an Estimate Based on Information Provided by Company Officials

  8. 3,027 WA 113 3,335 195 523 MT ME ND MN 40 2,332 VT OR 141 358 3,787 NH 3,455 332 ID WI 3,000 MA 889 4,680 SD 1,023 NY 17 RI MI CT WY 6,918 327 1,452 243 PA IA NJ NE 3,763 OH 42 1,567 89 3,691 267 5,100 NV MD DE 10,029 IN 557 IL UT 3,629 CA CO WV 680 2,918 4,472 KS 1,555 VA MO KY 21,168 3,010 NC TN 1,112 0 1,452 AZ 4,492 NM AR SC 6,701 2,064 GA 1,348 AL MS 7,183 186 TX LA 179 AK 1,109 FL 83 HI 366 OK 124,633 WORKERS REPORTED BY STATES AS ENTERED TRAINING FY04 –FY06 0 to 1,000 1,000 to 2,500 2,501 to 5,000 5,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 25,000 *Data obtained from 563 Reports

  9. ETA – 563: COMMON ISSUESTRA PAYMENTS • Three Types Of TRA Payments • Basic • Additional • Remedial • Four Types Of Data Collected • Total Number Of Recipients • Number Of First Payments • Weeks Paid • Amount Paid

  10. ETA – 563: COMMON ISSUES ENTERED TRAINING • Entered Training - Occupational • Entered Training - Remedial • Entered Training – OJT • Entered Training - Customized

  11. ETA – 563: COMMON ISSUES IN TRAINING • In Training • This Number Includes All Individuals Who Are In Training On The Last Day Of The Quarter • Individuals Who Are Continuing Training From The Previous Quarter • Individuals Who Entered Training During The Quarter

  12. ETA – 563: COMMON ISSUES WAIVERS • 12 Fields • 6 Waiver Types Issued • 6 Waiver Types Revoked No More Than One Waiver Type Should Be Tracked Per Participant Per Quarter

  13. ETA – 563: COMMON ISSUES PARTICIPANTS • 2 Fields • Total Count For The Quarter • Total Count For The FY To Date (Total Participants Year To Date) • What Does It Mean? • Unduplicated Count Of All Participants Who Touched Trade In Any Way, Including TRA, Waiver, Assessment, Training Or Job Search And Relocation

  14. ETA – 563: COMMON ISSUES CO-ENROLLMENT FIELDS • 2 Fields • Co-Enrolled In Wagner Peyser • Co-Enrolled In WIA Or NEG • Field Definition • Should Count Anyone Counted In The Participant Field (AM) That Has Also Received A Service From The Specified Partner Program

  15. TAPR / WISPR • WISPR Is Replacing The Current TAPR • All Fields Will Carry Over To WISPR • Current Issues: • People Who Receive ATAA Should Be Tracked, Should Not Have Received Training, Should Be Over 50 Years Old (30 Year Old Is Not Eligible) • DOB: People Should Not Be In The Program Who Are 2 Years Old Or Have Not Been Born Yet • Issued A Waiver And Receive TRA Need To Be Tracked

  16. 56% Washington 81% 68% 80% Maine 69% Montana North Dakota Minnesota 70% 74% Vermont Oregon 70% New Hampshire 90% 44% 72% 78% 80% Idaho Wisconsin New York Massachusetts 76% 69% 56% South Dakota 81% Rhode Island Michigan Connecticut Wyoming 70% 69% 64% 88% Pennsylvania Iowa New Jersey Nebraska 60% 77% 96% Ohio 0% Maryland 59% 75% 64% Nevada Delaware 65% Indiana 78% Utah Illinois 48% California 63% Colorado W Virginia 64% 70% Virginia Kansas 67% Missouri Kentucky 62% 47% North Carolina Tennessee 63% 71% 69% Oklahoma 64% Arizona 60% New Mexico Arkansas South Carolina 70% 39% Georgia 53% Alabama Mississippi 63% 71% Texas Louisiana 77% Alaska 90% Florida Hawaii FY04 TAPR ENTERED EMPLOYMENT NATIONAL GOAL = 70% Exceeded Goal by > 6% Did Not Meet Goal 1-5% > Goal

  17. 83% Washington 83% 75% 78% Maine 76% Montana North Dakota Minnesota 63% 76% Vermont Oregon 73% New Hampshire 83% 65% 74% 80% 89% Idaho Wisconsin New York Massachusetts 77% 76% 68% South Dakota 87% Rhode Island Michigan Connecticut Wyoming 71% 76% 75% 85% Pennsylvania Iowa New Jersey Nebraska 66% 88% 85% Ohio 95% Maryland 67% 78% 68% Nevada Delaware 67% Indiana 71% Utah Illinois 63% California 68% Colorado W Virginia 69% 72% Virginia Kansas 66% Missouri Kentucky 75% 57% North Carolina Tennessee 84% 79% 70% Oklahoma 71% Arizona 63% New Mexico Arkansas South Carolina 70% 62% Georgia 60% Alabama Mississippi 66% 69% Texas Louisiana 65% Alaska 59% Florida Hawaii FY05 TAPR ENTERED EMPLOYMENT NATIONAL GOAL = 70% Exceeded Goal by > 6% Did Not Meet Goal 1-5% > Goal

  18. 75% Washington 74% 80% 86% Maine 70% Montana North Dakota Minnesota 55% 72% Vermont Oregon 56% New Hampshire 78% 70% 75% 80% 86% Idaho Wisconsin New York Massachusetts 75% 83% 57% South Dakota 71% Rhode Island Michigan Connecticut Wyoming 80% 70% Pennsylvania Waiver 93% Iowa New Jersey Nebraska 64% 80% 82% Ohio 77% Maryland 43% 80% 70% Nevada Delaware 69% Indiana 75% Utah Illinois 73% California 64% Colorado W Virginia 80% 76% Virginia Kansas 67% Missouri Kentucky 76% 54% North Carolina Tennessee 83% 81% 72% Oklahoma 58% Arizona 70% New Mexico Arkansas South Carolina 71% 72% Georgia 59% Alabama Mississippi 79% 38% Texas Louisiana 57% Alaska 50% Florida Hawaii FY06 TAPR ENTERED EMPLOYMENT NATIONAL GOAL = 70% Exceeded Goal by > 6% Did Not Meet Goal 1-5% > Goal

  19. 82% Washington 82% 100% 93% 83% 88% Montana North Dakota South Dakota Michigan Minnesota 76% 85% 94% Vermont Oregon Idaho 100% 88% New Hampshire Mass 91% Wisconsin 87% 91% 92% 85% New York Rhode Island Connecticut Wyoming 90% 95% 91% Pennsylvania Iowa Nebraska 86% 79% 86% W Virginia Ohio 92% 0% 90% 89% 87% Nevada Maryland Delaware 90% Indiana 100% Utah Illinois California Colorado 93% 92% 89% Kansas 91% Virginia Missouri Kentucky 87% 91% 94% 88% 90% Tennessee S. Carolina N. Carolina Mississippi Maine 85% 91% 97% Oklahoma 91% Arizona New Mexico Arkansas 93% 92% Georgia Alabama 89% 87% Texas New Jersey Louisiana 83% Alaska 98% Florida Hawaii FY04 TAPR RETENTION RATE NATIONAL GOAL = 88% Exceeded Goal by > 6% Did Not Meet Goal 1-5% > Goal

  20. 90% Washington 91% 92% 94% 88% 92% Montana S. Dakota N. Dakota Idaho Minnesota 80% 91% Vermont Oregon 93% New Hampshire 92% 87% Wisconsin 86% Massachusetts 88% 92% 94% 86% 92% New York 94% Rhode Island Michigan Maine Connecticut Wyoming Utah 91% 94% 75% 63% Iowa Missouri New Jersey Nebraska 91% 94% 83% Ohio 98% Pennsylvania 80% 93% 90% Nevada Maryland Delaware 91% Indiana 100% Illinois California Colorado 91% 90% 90% 90% 94% Kansas 88% Virginia W. Virginia S. Carolina N. Carolina Kentucky 91% 91% 97% Oklahoma 91% Arizona New Mexico Arkansas 92% 91% Georgia Alabama 91% 93% 89% 89% Texas Louisiana Tennessee Mississippi 78% Alaska 87% Florida Hawaii FY05 TAPR RETENTION RATE NATIONAL GOAL = 89% Exceeded Goal by > 6% Did Not Meet Goal 1-5% > Goal

  21. 93% Washington 88% 98% 90% 82% 91% 90% N. Dakota Montana Minnesota S. Dakota Maine N. Hampshire 89% 88% Vermont Oregon 93% 91% 87% Idaho Wisconsin 87% Massachusetts 89% 88% 90% 87% 100% New York Rhode Island Michigan Ohio Connecticut Wyoming 91% 88% 95% Pennsylvania Iowa New Jersey Nebraska 92% 89% 61% 80% 92% Nevada Maryland Delaware 89% Indiana 87% 90% Illinois California Colorado Utah 93% 92% 89% 89% 91% 90% Kansas 86% Virginia W. Virginia N. Carolina S. Carolina Missouri Kentucky 86% Tennessee 91% 86% 94% Oklahoma 87% Arizona New Mexico Arkansas 92% Georgia 88% 90% Mississippi Alabama 91% 75% Texas Louisiana 72% Alaska 91% Florida Hawaii FY06 TAPR RETENTION RATE NATIONAL GOAL = 85% Exceeded Goal by > 6% Did Not Meet Goal 1-5% > Goal

  22. 60% Washington 81% 90% 90% Maine 68% Montana North Dakota Minnesota 72% 71% Vermont Oregon 71% New Hampshire 71% 59% 81% 75% 97% Wisconsin Idaho New York Massachusetts 82% 76% 69% South Dakota 100% Rhode Island Michigan Connecticut Wyoming 66% 62% 75% 67% Pennsylvania Iowa New Jersey Nebraska 66% 111% 79% Ohio 0% Maryland 77% 69% 70% Nevada Delaware 67% Indiana 74% Utah Illinois 60% California 91% Colorado W Virginia 59% 86% Virginia Kansas 85% Missouri Kentucky 90% 76% North Carolina Tennessee 60% 82% 77% Oklahoma 71% Arizona 75% New Mexico Arkansas South Carolina 84% 74% Georgia 76% Alabama Mississippi 74% 85% Texas Louisiana 61% Alaska 70% Florida Hawaii FY04 TAPR WAGE REPLACEMENT NATIONAL GOAL = 90% Exceeded Goal by > 6% Did Not Meet Goal 1-5% > Goal

  23. 64% Washington 83% 79% 67% Maine 87% Montana North Dakota Minnesota 71% 76% Vermont Oregon 79% New Hampshire 74% 65% 76% 82% 100% Idaho Wisconsin New York Massachusetts 85% 85% 72% South Dakota 81% Rhode Island Michigan Connecticut Wyoming 74% 66% 77% 58% Pennsylvania Iowa New Jersey Nebraska 69% 107% 73% Ohio 80% Maryland 77% 71% 79% Nevada Delaware 74% Indiana 78% Utah Illinois 97% California 86% Colorado W Virginia 56% 89% Virginia Kansas 87% Missouri Kentucky 78% 78% North Carolina Tennessee 78% 85% 83% Oklahoma 86% Arizona 84% New Mexico Arkansas South Carolina 87% 87% Georgia 79% Alabama Mississippi 75% 87% Texas Louisiana 95% Alaska 71% Florida Hawaii FY05 TAPR WAGE REPLACEMENT NATIONAL GOAL = 80% Exceeded Goal by > 6% Did Not Meet Goal 1-5% > Goal

  24. 86% Washington 82% 85% 106% Maine 145% Montana North Dakota Minnesota 65% 113% Vermont Oregon 94% New Hampshire 46% 61% 103% 90% 107% Idaho Wisconsin New York Massachusetts 91% 104% 70% South Dakota 30% Rhode Island Michigan Connecticut Wyoming 76% Pennsylvania Waiver 88% 71% Iowa New Jersey Nebraska 83% 100% 80% Ohio 114% Maryland 96% 85% 99% Nevada Delaware 79% Indiana 77% Utah Illinois 88% California 85% Colorado W Virginia 89% 87% Virginia Kansas 80% Missouri Kentucky 151% 78% North Carolina Tennessee 358% 104% 78% Oklahoma 96% Arizona 101% New Mexico Arkansas South Carolina 105% 95% Georgia 107% Alabama Mississippi 82% 1% Texas Louisiana 151% Alaska 108% Florida Hawaii FY06 TAPR WAGE REPLACEMENT NATIONAL GOAL = 80% Exceeded Goal by > 6% Did Not Meet Goal 1-5% > Goal

  25. ATAA • Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) Program Benefits Are Provided As An Alternative To The Benefits Offered Under The Regular TAA Program. Participation In ATAA Allows Older Workers, For Whom Retraining May Not Be Appropriate, To Accept Reemployment At A Lower Wage And Receive A Wage Subsidy

  26. ATAAAR - TEGL 01-06 • ATAAAR Tracks Current Participation In The ATAA Program • 12 Fields • Number Of ATAA Applicants • Number Of First ATAA Payments, Etc… • Due At The End Of Each Quarter (45 Days) • Data Has Been Used By Congress And CRS, Current Issue For Reauthorization

  27. 30 Washington 3 10 93 143 49 Montana N Dakota S Dakota Maine Minnesota 34 56 Vermont Oregon 102 New Hampshire 44 217 57 367 Idaho Wisconsin Massachusetts 26 387 New York 43 0 Rhode Island Michigan Connecticut Wyoming 383 66 46 13 Pennsylvania Iowa New Jersey Nebraska 301 5 Ohio 47 3 600 31 156 Nevada Maryland Delaware 27 Indiana 48 Utah Illinois California Colorado 23 109 297 71 626 280 Kansas 101 Virginia W Virginia N Carolina S Carolina Missouri Kentucky 336 Tennessee 126 42 0 Oklahoma 52 Arizona New Mexico Arkansas 260 159 Georgia 89 Alabama Mississippi 356 Texas 0 Alaska 18 Florida 0 Hawaii 20 Louisiana ATAA PARTICAPTION COUNTCY 2006 500+ 250 – 499 100 – 249 0 – 99

  28. TRADE FUNDING FORMULA • The Statutory Training Cap For The TAA Program Is $220 Million • The Training Base Allocations Consist Of 75 Percent ($165 Million) • Reserve Is 25 Percent Of The Base ($55 Million) • Administration Is In Addition To The $220 Million For A Total Of $259.6 Million

  29. TRADE FUNDING FORMULA FY 07 Funding Process • 50 Percent Of TAA Formula Funds Based On Accrued Training Expenditures (10 Quarters/2.5) • 50 Percent Of Taa Formula Funds Based On Average Number Of Training Participants (10 Quarters/2.5) • Hold-harmless: 85% Of Previous Year

  30. $56,563,752 WA $6,083,071 $1,162,795 $3,383,038 $18,488,942 MT ND SD ME $10,310,030 $22,090,919 $16,856,287 $2,533,284 ID $2,061,007 OR MN NH VT $35,946,873 $42,629,732 $13,013,655 $27,555,870 MI WI NY MA $5,564,440 $7,459,190 $407,497 RI WY Connecticut $76,861,847 $16,786,395 $6,285,612 $2,056,074 PA Iowa NJ NE $27,212,209 $13,801,502 $725,718 $6,686,020 $965,594 $2,540,078 OH WV DE $23,445,904 UT $31,146,041 NV MD $35,371,276 IN $6,785,549 IL CA $29,121,845 CO $8,860,169 $19,251,736 VA $14,745,699 KS MO KY $9,246,470 $14,294,435 TN SC $6,525,260 $10,452,667 $3,076,883 OK $8,030,463 AZ NM AR $39,283,445 $4,912,409 $9,203,345 GA NC $6,343,804 AL MS $53,721,698 $2,602,787 TX LA $11,052,845 $1,997,352 FL Alaska $704,969 Hawaii TOTAL OBLIGATIONS FOR TRAINING & ADMINISTRATION FY 2004 –FY 2006 Total: $776,589,796 $0 to $10,000,000 $10,000,001 to $25,001,000 $25,000,001 to $40,000,000 $40,000,001 to $65,000,000 $65,000,001 to $80,000,000

  31. 26% Washington 45% 47% 43% Maine 17% Montana North Dakota Minnesota 56% 60% 67% Vermont New Hampshire Oregon 67% 39% 54% Massachusetts 71% 38% Idaho Wisconsin South Dakota New York 76% 63% 26% Rhode Island Michigan Wyoming 74% 42% 73% Connecticut 31% Pennsylvania Iowa 68% Nebraska 84% New Jersey 6% Ohio 69% 4% 65% Nevada 5% 80% Indiana 46% Utah Illinois Delaware 79% W Virginia Colorado 66% California 26% 45% 61% Virginia 77% Kansas Maryland Missouri Kentucky 71% 38% N Carolina Tennessee 23% 32% 30% 58% 50% Oklahoma Arizona S Carolina Arkansas New Mexico 50% 31% Georgia 30% Alabama Mississippi 56% 3% Texas Louisiana 48% Alaska 6% Florida 7% Hawaii TOTAL FUNDS SPENT AS % OF TOTAL AVAILABLE FY05 - FY07* 75 – 100% 51 – 74% 0 – 50% * As of March 2007

  32. TRADE FUNDING FORMULA FY 08 Funding Process: • Accrued Training Expenditures (269) • Training Participants (563) • Currently Exploring Difference Options For The FY08 Base Allocation

  33. CONTACT INFORMATION Susan Worden (202) 693-3517 Worden.susan@dol.gov Brian Johnston (202) 693-3566 Johnston.brian@dol.gov

More Related