1 / 63

Algorithms and Applications in Computer Vision

Algorithms and Applications in Computer Vision. Lihi Zelnik -Manor lihi@ee.technion.ac.il Lecture 6: Feature detection. Today: Feature Detection and Matching. Local features Pyramids for invariant feature detection Invariant descriptors Matching. Image matching. by Diva Sian.

carlos-goff
Télécharger la présentation

Algorithms and Applications in Computer Vision

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Algorithms and Applications in Computer Vision LihiZelnik-Manor lihi@ee.technion.ac.il Lecture 6: Feature detection

  2. Today: Feature Detection and Matching • Local features • Pyramids for invariant feature detection • Invariant descriptors • Matching

  3. Image matching by Diva Sian by swashford TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAAAAA

  4. Harder case by Diva Sian by scgbt

  5. Harder still? NASA Mars Rover images

  6. Answer below (look for tiny colored squares…) NASA Mars Rover images with SIFT feature matchesFigure by Noah Snavely

  7. Local features and alignment • We need to match (align) images • Global methods sensitive to occlusion, lighting, parallax effects. So look for local features that match well. • How would you do it by eye? [Darya Frolova and Denis Simakov]

  8. Local features and alignment • Detect feature points in both images [Darya Frolova and Denis Simakov]

  9. Local features and alignment • Detect feature points in both images • Find corresponding pairs [Darya Frolova and Denis Simakov]

  10. Local features and alignment • Detect feature points in both images • Find corresponding pairs • Use these pairs to align images [Darya Frolova and Denis Simakov]

  11. Local features and alignment Problem 1: Detect the same point independently in both images no chance to match! We need a repeatable detector [Darya Frolova and Denis Simakov]

  12. Local features and alignment Problem 2: For each point correctly recognize the corresponding one ? We need a reliable and distinctive descriptor [Darya Frolova and Denis Simakov]

  13. Geometric transformations

  14. Photometric transformations Figure from T. Tuytelaars ECCV 2006 tutorial

  15. And other nuisances… Noise Blur Compression artifacts …

  16. Invariant local features Subset of local feature types designed to be invariant to common geometric and photometric transformations. Basic steps: Detect distinctive interest points Extract invariant descriptors Figure: David Lowe

  17. Main questions • Where will the interest points come from? • What are salient features that we’ll detect in multiple views? • How to describe a local region? • How to establish correspondences, i.e., compute matches?

  18. Finding Corners • Key property: in the region around a corner, image gradient has two or more dominant directions • Corners are repeatable and distinctive C.Harris and M.Stephens. "A Combined Corner and Edge Detector.“Proceedings of the 4th Alvey Vision Conference: pages 147--151.  Source: Lana Lazebnik

  19. “flat” region:no change in all directions “edge”:no change along the edge direction “corner”:significant change in all directions Corners as distinctive interest points • We should easily recognize the point by looking through a small window • Shifting a window in anydirection should give a large change in intensity Source: A. Efros

  20. Window function Shifted intensity Intensity Window function w(x,y) = or 1 in window, 0 outside Gaussian Harris Detector formulation Change of intensity for the shift [u,v]: Source: R. Szeliski

  21. M Harris Detector formulation This measure of change can be approximated by: where M is a 22 matrix computed from image derivatives: Gradient with respect to x, times gradient with respect to y Sum over image region – area we are checking for corner

  22. M Harris Detector formulation where M is a 22 matrix computed from image derivatives: Gradient with respect to x, times gradient with respect to y Sum over image region – area we are checking for corner

  23. What does this matrix reveal? First, consider an axis-aligned corner:

  24. What does this matrix reveal? First, consider an axis-aligned corner: This means dominant gradient directions align with x or y axis If either λ is close to 0, then this is not a corner, so look for locations where both are large. What if we have a corner that is not aligned with the image axes? Slide credit: David Jacobs

  25. direction of the fastest change direction of the slowest change (max)-1/2 (min)-1/2 General Case Since M is symmetric, we have We can visualize M as an ellipse with axis lengths determined by the eigenvalues and orientation determined by R Slide adapted form Darya Frolova, Denis Simakov.

  26. Interpreting the eigenvalues Classification of image points using eigenvalues of M: 2 “Edge” 2 >> 1 “Corner”1 and 2 are large,1 ~ 2;E increases in all directions 1 and 2 are small;E is almost constant in all directions “Edge” 1 >> 2 “Flat” region 1

  27. Corner response function α: constant (0.04 to 0.06) “Edge” R < 0 “Corner”R > 0 |R| small “Edge” R < 0 “Flat” region

  28. Harris Corner Detector Algorithm steps: Compute M matrix within all image windows to get their R scores Find points with large corner response (R > threshold) Take the points of local maxima of R

  29. Harris Detector: Workflow Slide adapted form Darya Frolova, Denis Simakov, Weizmann Institute.

  30. Harris Detector: Workflow Compute corner response R

  31. Harris Detector: Workflow Find points with large corner response: R>threshold

  32. Harris Detector: Workflow Take only the points of local maxima of R

  33. Harris Detector: Workflow

  34. Harris Detector: Properties Rotation invariance Ellipse rotates but its shape (i.e. eigenvalues) remains the same Corner response R is invariant to image rotation

  35. Harris Detector: Properties Not invariant to image scale All points will be classified as edges Corner !

  36. How can we detect scale invariant interest points?

  37. How to cope with transformations? • Exhaustive search • Invariance • Robustness

  38. Exhaustive search • Multi-scale approach Slide from T. Tuytelaars ECCV 2006 tutorial

  39. Exhaustive search • Multi-scale approach

  40. Exhaustive search • Multi-scale approach

  41. Exhaustive search • Multi-scale approach

  42. Invariance • Extract patch from each image individually

  43. Automatic scale selection Solution: Design a function on the region, which is “scale invariant” (the same for corresponding regions, even if they are at different scales) scale = 1/2 Image 1 f f Image 2 region size region size Example: average intensity. For corresponding regions (even of different sizes) it will be the same. • For a point in one image, we can consider it as a function of region size (patch width)

  44. Automatic scale selection Common approach: scale = 1/2 Image 1 f f Image 2 s1 s2 region size region size Take a local maximum of this function Observation: region size, for which the maximum is achieved, should be invariant to image scale. Important: this scale invariant region size is found in each image independently!

  45. Automatic Scale Selection Function responses for increasing scale (scale signature) 48 K. Grauman, B. Leibe K. Grauman, B. Leibe

  46. Automatic Scale Selection Function responses for increasing scale (scale signature) 49 K. Grauman, B. Leibe K. Grauman, B. Leibe

  47. Automatic Scale Selection Function responses for increasing scale (scale signature) 50 K. Grauman, B. Leibe K. Grauman, B. Leibe

  48. Automatic Scale Selection Function responses for increasing scale (scale signature) 51 K. Grauman, B. Leibe K. Grauman, B. Leibe

More Related