1 / 0

Sustainability of the Small Farm Production of Ethanol from Sugarcane

Sustainability of the Small Farm Production of Ethanol from Sugarcane. Megan Coffelt University of West Florida . Summary . Discuss: The scenario of ethanol production on small farms and their importance

carney
Télécharger la présentation

Sustainability of the Small Farm Production of Ethanol from Sugarcane

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sustainability of the Small Farm Production of Ethanol from Sugarcane

    Megan Coffelt University of West Florida
  2. Summary Discuss: The scenario of ethanol production on small farms and their importance Basic review of cachaça production and potential for ethanol production from the head and tail Vinasse-Problem or solution? Positive and negative aspects of vinasse Case study
  3. The Small Farm System For the system to be sustainable, integration of food production and energy is needed Systems and areas required: Land for planting sugarcane Diversified crops Production area for cachaça and ethanol Animals (cattle, dairy cows, chickens, swine) Think where the fuel will be used - Farmer: Personal use Equipment
  4. Ethanol Production Milling Fermentation Distillation - Main differences between cachaça and ethanol are present at this stage Different sized columns are used Important byproducts vinasse bagasse
  5. Example of milling Fermentation tank
  6. Differences in Ethanol and Cachaça Production Alembic Distillation column for ethanol
  7. Bagasse Crushed sugarcane stalks that results from milling Use of bagasse include: - Used as a fuel for distilation - Animal feed - Can used used with manure as fertilizer Primary use is as a fuel
  8. Vinasse Wastewater that results from cachaça and ethanol production Problematic characteristics : 1 L of ethanol produces 10-13 L Characterized as nutrient rich, having a low pH and a high concentration of organic matter may lead to a reduction in the quality of soil and water.
  9. Methods of Treatment Application as a fertilizer The use as an additive to animal feed Production of biogas through anaerobic digestion
  10. Treatment Methods: Animal Feed Additive As an ideal additive due to the availability of organic acids, calcium, and phosphorus Beneficial when used as an additive in poultry, ruminant, and pig feeds
  11. Methods of Treatment: Fertilizer Beneficial due to the concentration of vinasse Rich in potassium, sulfur, nitrogen and organic matter, which improves the soil quality Profitable, since it reduces the demand for traditional fertilizers Information about the environment is necessary - Complete evaluation of soil - Location and distance of water bodies - Climatic characteristics
  12. Methods of Treatment: Anaerobic Digestion Process used to treat vinasse Microbes oxygen to convert organic matter and nutrients to carbon dioxide and methane - Acid-forming bacteria alter the organic material to low molecular weight compounds Methane forming bacteria then convert to the low molecular weight compound, methane In addition to methane and carbon dioxide, a liquid that is produced can be used as fertilizer
  13. Production of Biogas Requires anaerobic digestion Vinasse can produce 14,23 m3CH4m-3 of biogas per 1 m3, which is higher than traditional materials used on farms for biogas production. Can be used as a secondary fuel source on the farm after ethanol
  14. Amount of Biogas Generated from Vinasse Compared to Traditional Feedstock Sources
  15. Calculations: Case Study Were performed to calculate the quantities of products produced on a small farm The calculations were based on the following values: - Capacity of still: 1.000 L - Number of distillations per day: 2 - Percentage of alcohol in fermented juice: 8% - Sugarcane yield per hectare: 80 t/ha - Amount of juice per ton of cane: 600 L/t - Number of production days: 200 porano
  16. Calculations Additional information was required for the head, heart and tail sections of juice: - The head is 15% of the alcohol volume with 65ºGL - The heart is 60% of the alcohol volume with 43ºGL - The tail is 25% of the alchohol volume with 35ºGL
  17. Results: Alcohol Produced
  18. Results: Byproducts produced
  19. Discussion: Case Study The results show that: - Sustainability or at least reduced reliance on external sources can be achieved: Fuel from ethanol, biogas and bagasse Fertilizers from vinasse, composted bagasse, and liquids from anaerobic digestion Feed from bagasse Feed additive from vinasse
  20. Conclusion The process used for ethanol and cachaça production yield byproducts that can be used in small farm (vinasse and bagasse) - All derivatives can be used, reducing waste and improving the sustainability - System that has a reduced environmental impact compared to industries The methods of treatment used to change vinasse are a main concern that will determine the overall effectiveness of the system.
  21. References Azimi, A., Zamanzadeh, M. 2004. Determination of Design Criteria for USAB Reactors as a Wastewater Pretreatment System in Tropical Small Communities. International Journal of Environmental and Technology 1: 51-57.   Baez-Smith, C. Anaerobic Digestion of Vinasse for the Production of Methane in the Sugar Cane Distillery, in SPRI Conference on Sugar Processing, 2006.   Barbosa, E., Arruda, F., Pires, A., Silva,T., Sakai, E. n.d. Sugarcane Fertirrigated with Mineral Fertilizer andVinasseUnder Subsurface Drip Irrigation During Four Cycles.  Buckman, H. and Brady, N. 1969. The Nature and Properties of Soils. United States:Macmillian Company.  Brasmetano. ComuniçãoPessoal. 2007. In: Salomon, K., Lora, E. 2009. Estimate of the Electric Energy Potential for Different Sources of Biogas in Brazil. Biomass and Bioenergy 33: 1101-1107.   Centro de GestãoeEstudosEstratégicos (CGEE). 2012. Sustainability of Sugarcane Bioenergy. Brazília, DF: Center for Strategic Studies and Management.   Hidalgo, K. “Vinasse in Feed: Good for Animal and Environment,” All About Feed, 29 November 2009, <http://www.allaboutfeed.net/Nutrition/Raw-Materials/2009/11/Vinasse-in-feed- Good-for-animal-and-environment-AAF011591W/> (28 February 2013).
  22. References Ingersoll Rand Microturbine. Ingersoll Rand Online. n.d. In: Salomon, K., Lora, E. 2009. Estimate of the Electric Energy Potential for Different Sources of Biogas in Brazil. Biomass and Bioenergy 33: 1101-1107. Jiang, J., Sui, J., Wu, S., Yang, Y., Wang, L. Prospects of anaerobics Digestion Technology in China. 2007. In: Salomon, K., Lora, E. 2009. Estimate of the Electric Energy Potential for Different Sources of Biogas in Brazil. Biomass and Bioenergy 33: 1101-1107.   Johansson, T., Kelly, H., Reddy, A., Williams, R. Renewable Energy Sources for Fuels and Electricity, 1993, In: Salomon, K., Lora, E. 2009. Estimate of the Electric Energy Potential for Different Sources of Biogas in Brazil. Biomass and Bioenergy 33: 1101- 1107.   Klein, L., Erichsen Jones, J., Hawkes, H., Downing, A. River Pollution II: Causes and Effects, 1972. In: Baez-Smith, C. Anaerobic Digestion of Vinasse for the Production of Methane in the Sugar Cane Distillery, in SPRI Conference on Sugar Processing, 2006.   Lal, R., Stewart, B. 1994. Soil Properties and Water Quality. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, 3.  Lamm, F., Camp, C. Subsurface Drip Irrigation, 2007. In: Barbosa, E., Arruda, F., Pires, A., Silva,T., Sakai, E. n.d. Sugarcane Fertirrigated with Mineral Fertilizer and Vinasse Under Subsurface Drip Irrigation During Four Cycles.
  23. References Lamm, F.,Trooien, T. Subsurface Drip Irrigation for Corn Production: A Review of 10 Years of Research in Kansas, 2007. In: Barbosa, E., Arruda, F., Pires, A., Silva,T., Sakai, E. n.d. Sugarcane Fertirrigated with Mineral Fertilizer and Vinasse Under Subsurface Drip Irrigation During Four Cycles.  Long, H. “Lesson 4: Aerobic and Anaerobic Digestion and Types of Decomposition,” n.d., <http://water.me.vccs.edu/courses/ENV149/lesson4b.htm> (15 March 2013). Martinelli, L., Filoso, S. 2008. Expansion of Sugarcane Ethanol Production in Brazil: Environmental and Social Changes. The Ecological Society of America 18: 885-898. Nation Non-Food Crops Centre (NNFCC) and The Andersons Centre (AC), Anaerobic Digestion, n.d., <http://www.biogas-info.co.uk/index.php/heat-and-power-agri.html > (4 March 2013).   Penn State University (PSU), Penn State Extension, 2013, <http://extension.psu.edu/energy/ waste-to-energy/biogas/basics-of-anaerobic-digestion> (25 February 2013). Pires, R. and Ferreira, O. 2008. UtilizaçãodaVinhaçana Bio-FertirrigaçãodaCulturada Cana-de-Açúcar: Estudo de CasoemGoiás.
  24. References Rangnekar, D. “Integration of Sugarcane and Milk Production in Western India,” FAO Corporate Document Repository, n.d., <http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/s8850e/ S8850E17.htm> (20 March 2013). Salomon, K., Lora, E. 2009. Estimate of the Electric Energy Potential for Different Sources of Biogas in Brazil. Biomass and Bioenergy 33: 1101-1107. Scholtes, F. 2009. Status Quo and Prospects of Smallholders in the Brazilian Sugarcane and Ethanol Sector: Lessons for Development and Poverty Reduction. ZEF Working Paper Series, vol. 43. Bonn, Germany: University of Bonn: Center for Development Research Department of Political and Cultural Change. Siemens, Siemens, 2011, <http://www.water.siemens.com/en/applications/ sludge_biosolids_treatment/aerobic_digestion/Pages/default.aspx> (20 February 2013).  Silva, M., Griebeler, N., Borges, L. 2007. Uso de VinhaçaeImpactosnasPropriedadesdo Solo eLençolFreático. RevistaBrasileira de EngenhariaAgrícolaeAmbiental 11: 108-114. Smeets, E., Junginger, M., Faaj, A., Walter, A., Dolzan, P. 2006. Sustainability of Brazilian Bioethanol. TC Utrecht: Copernicus Institute: Department of Science, Technology, and Society.
  25. References Stepan, D. “The Breakdown of Anaerobic Digestion,” Biomass Magazine, n.d., <http://biomassmagazine.com/articles/1680/the-breakdown-on-anaerobic-digestion> (18 February 2013).   Stout, B. 1979. Energy of World Agriculture. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Unica. 2007. Production and Use of Fuel Ethanol in Brazil: Answers to the Most Frequently Asked Questions. São Paulo: Unica United States Department of Energy (USDE) and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1982. Fuel from Farms. Golden, CO: Technical Information Office: Solar Energy Research Institute. Vitti, G., Luz, P., Altran, W. 2012. Nutrition and Fertilization. In: Santos, F. (Ed.), Borém, A. (ED.), Caldas,C. (Ed. ), Sugarcane Bioenergy, Sugar and Ethanol: Technology and Prospects (67-111). Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa.   Vasconcelos, J. 2012. Ethanol Fermentation. In: Santos, F. (Ed.), Borém, A. (ED.), Caldas,C. (Ed. ), Sugarcane Bioenergy, Sugar and Ethanol: Technology and Prospects (387- 422). Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa.
  26. OBRIGADA
More Related