1 / 22

Discourses and discourse sites of nanotechnology

Explore the multifaceted realms of nanotechnology discourse sites, from education to civil society organizations, and delve into the distinct practices at each site. Discover how media practices shape social engagement and navigate the complexities of framing the risks and opportunities associated with nanotechnology.

carolinal
Télécharger la présentation

Discourses and discourse sites of nanotechnology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Discourses and discourse sites of nanotechnology Padraig Murphy, School of Communications, Dublin City University Environmental Protection Agency STRIVE Research Fellowship, 2007-2009 Negotiating New Sciences in Society, Dublin City University, 22nd -23rd January 2009 Science//Society Symposium

  2. The silver nano particle washing machine…

  3. The Nokia Morph

  4. Under discussion • nanotechnology as a set of discourses • various ‘sites’ where these discourses are ‘grounded’, • that is, where there may be potential for public discourse

  5. Defining discourses We can base our definition of discourse on that of Michel Foucault: “Rules that govern bodies of text and utterances” (Norman Fairclough, Analysing Discourse,2003)

  6. Defining discourse sites • Locations for grounding a discourse • The discourse and practices appear to be centralised • There is a sense of place, of ‘where’ something happens • Depending on objects and ‘things’ Schatzki, T. R. 2002. The site of the social

  7. A theory of practices • “A 'practice' … is a routinised type of behaviour which consists of several elements, interconnected to one another: forms of bodily activities, forms of mental activities, 'things' and their use • “A practice - a way of cooking, of consuming, of working, of investigating, of taking care of oneself or of others, etc. - forms … a 'block' whose existence necessarily depends on the existence and specific interconnectedness of these elements, and which cannot be reduced to any one of these single elements.” (p249-250) • Reckwitz, A. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorising. European Journal of Social Theory , 5, (2), pp.245- 265.

  8. But how would nanotechnology be considered in terms of ‘everyday practices’, when the term appears to be so abstract, largely unknown among publics?

  9. Practice theory and media Practice theory and media • “…contextualising a new research paradigm that theorises media as practice, rather than as text or production process: what range of practices are oriented to media and what is the role of media-oriented practices in ordering other practices?” • [Practice theory] addresses questions that are no longer questions about media as such, or even about the direct consumption of media, but rather questions about the contributions media practices make to social practice more generally” (Couldry, 2006, p129-130). • Couldry, N. 2004. Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14 (2), pp115-132.

  10. Examples of discourse sites

  11. Public affairs media Technoscience/ commerce Policy Education Civil Society Organisations Humanities & social sciences Local community Fictive/ Web 2.0 forums

  12. What about nanoscale science itself? Is it a discourse site? What about nanotechnology products? Mark Erickson (2005). Science, culture and society: understanding science in the 21st century A distinction in ‘formal science’ practices (lab-produced knowledge) between use of ‘esoteric’ language (practices of everyday lab science and applied technology) and ‘exoteric’ (discourses on science that occur outside these practices). Erickson suggests that current nanotechnology is mainly exoteric.

  13. Examples of discursive framing and distinct practices at discourse sites Technoscience/ commerce Highly strategic, economy focus Highly strategic, economy focus; internationally a turn towards science and society references Policy Critical, investigative, setting up protagonists and issues, deadlines and angles Public affairs media Applied formal science, practices detached from ‘exoteric discourses’ Science Education

  14. Where is the risk talk?

  15. Examples of discursive framing and distinct practices at discourse sites (ctd): including risk discourses Combative, harmony with nature, safety rather than risk, big statements Civil Society Organisations Theoretical, abstract, main constructions of nanotechnology with formal science Humanities & social sciences Local community Local issues, many grounded discourses, H&SS-driven nano talk

  16. Examples of discursive framing and distinct practices at discourse sites (ctd): Where is the risk talk? Mixing esoteric with exoteric; largely utopian but nano risks discussed openly Fictive/ Web 2.0 Forums

  17. Irish nanotechnology discourse sites?

  18. ? Irish nanotechnology discourse sites? ?

  19. Can Ireland compete/ connect? • “responsible innovation” • business case • social case • cultural case • participative case • educational case

  20. Concluding questions • Is nanotechnology such an interdisciplinary entity that there are a range of sites of specific practices, many with common framings? • Can we share resources and ideas (and frames) across these discourse sites successfully for public engagement? • Irish policy, technoscience and public affairs media out of step with emerging risk and cultural discourses of nanotechnology globally?

More Related