1 / 7

HIGH COURT CLAIMS ON BEHALF OF MODERN SLAVERY VICTIMS

This article explores high court claims on behalf of modern slavery victims, discussing existing authorities such as Dulghieru, Godwin v Ozoigwe, Galdikas v Houghton, and Ajayi v Abu. It covers causes of action in tort and contract, types of damages, and limitation periods.

carrd
Télécharger la présentation

HIGH COURT CLAIMS ON BEHALF OF MODERN SLAVERY VICTIMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HIGH COURT CLAIMS ON BEHALF OF MODERN SLAVERY VICTIMS

  2. EXISTING AUTHORITIES AT v Dulghieru[2009] EWHC 225 QB Godwin v Ozoigwe, CA, 16th June 1992 Galdikas v Houghton and others [2016] EWHC 1376 QB Ajayi v Abu, unreported, 1st December 2017, [2017] EWHC 3098

  3. CAUSES OF ACTION - TORT Trespass to the person: Assault and battery False imprisonment – seeJollah v SSHD [2018] EWHC Civ 1260 Protection fromHarassmentAct 1997 Negligence: commonlawduty to provide a safe system of work (non delegable); mayextend to protection fromacts of 3rd parties –Rahman v Arearose[2001] QB 351 Intimidation/deceit – Godwin v Ozoigwe Unlawfulmeansconspiracy

  4. CAUSES OF ACTION - CONTRACT National minimum wage Unlawfulcontract? Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42 Hounga v Allen [2014] 1 WLR 2889 Quantum meruit

  5. TYPES OF DAMAGE Trespass torts are actionableper se Personalinjury Anxiety and distress/aggravated damages Pecuniaryloss: Pastwages Future wages/earningcapacity Exemplary damages

  6. LIMITATION Limitation Act 1980 Contract and tort 6 years Contractuallossrunscontinually but: S.32 Limitation Act – concealment of facts relevant to cause of action – time does not run – seeAjayi v Abu Any claim thatincludespersonalinjury– 3 years Section 33 Limitation Act - disapplying the limitation period for personalinjury PHA 1997: 6 yearsincluding PI – but cannotbeextended

  7. CASE STUDY – AJAYI v ABU

More Related