1 / 15

Conceptualising and operationalising a structural approach to HIV prevention

Conceptualising and operationalising a structural approach to HIV prevention. Justin Parkhurst LSHTM / LIDC. Calls not new. The importance of structural factors, or strategies for prevention dealing with underlying causes seen before

carrington
Télécharger la présentation

Conceptualising and operationalising a structural approach to HIV prevention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Conceptualising and operationalising a structural approach to HIV prevention Justin Parkhurst LSHTM / LIDC

  2. Calls not new • The importance of structural factors, or strategies for prevention dealing with underlying causes seen before • 2000 special issue of AIDS dedicated to structural approaches • 1990s – articles identifying and calling for greater inclusion of structures or ‘enabling environments’. • Yet little progress in policies/plans dealing with structures • Focus has remained on individual interventions, or searches for ‘magic bullets’ • Language has remained simple – e.g. Science 2008 ‘what works’ – ‘reducing multiple sexual partnerships’ • Little though about how to achieve this. • “few demonstrated replicable approaches to reducing multiple sexual partnerships” (Potts et al 2008)

  3. Structural factors, structural drivers? • Many factors are associated with risk behaviour • Macro/Statistical correlations • Descriptive works have highlighted potential causal drivers of risk behaviour • Complexity involved with any determinant of behaviour • Multiple structures will influence patterns of behaviour. Often no single ‘start point’ per se, or direct cause.

  4. Can classify structural factors • By risk group: • IDUs • OVCs • Females/girls • MSM • Etc. • By sector: • Legal • Economic • Education • Socio-cultural • Etc.

  5. Other models/classifications • Structures affecting interventions: • Availability • Acceptability • Accessibility (Blankenship et al, 2000)

  6. Cohen and Scribner (2000)

  7. Causal Levels • Superstructural • Structural • Environmental • Individual (Sweat and Denison, 1995)

  8. Distal-Proximal determinants of HIV infection (Barnett and Whiteside, 2002)

  9. Useful for planners? • Key issues appears to be identifying to planers: • What they can (practically) do • Where they can act (what levels, what issues) • How to act in a ‘structural’ way • Key needs are therefore: • A conceptual model which identifies points of potential action • A strategy to guide planning

  10. Points of potential action • Most useful/applicable elements of past models appear to be: • Level of activities – local, mid-level, national/international • Proximity of factor to ultimate risk behaviour of interest

  11. Strategy for planning • Structural approaches effectively call for targeting activities to community needs. 2 ways to do so: • Enabling approach • Set up structures so that local (target) communities can identify needs and act on them • ‘Diagnostic’ approach • Approach intervention by first researching your target population and identifying drivers of risk behaviour.

  12. Distal Proximal Inability to meet key needs Sugar daddy to support school fees P O V E R T Y Unable to meet education costs Pull child out of school to work on farm Food insecurity No spending on health care Transactional sex Diseases untreated - More indirect impact - Longer causal chain - Difficult to monitor and measure impact - Typically affects larger population group - Typically longer duration of impact - More direct causal impact - Easier to monitor and measure impact - Typically affects smaller population group - Typically shorter duration of impact Suits: – Local planners addressing a specific community (e.g. young women in a village); - Programme officers with specific HIV remit; - Planners with concern for specific target groups (e.g. IDUs) Suits: – National planners addressing large populations; - Programme officers with broader development remit; - International donors.

  13. Challenges/Issues • How to move forward our conceptions of structural factors? • A clear framework that is understood and useful to planners • Can we make guides for different types of actors? • A set of guidelines for planning? • How to make useful recommendations? • When can we generalise? • How to assess if contexts are similar enough, etc. • How to evaluate and determine causality?

  14. How to shift thinking away from sets of ‘magic bullet’ interventions? • What can be learned from other disciplines on similar issues? • Do other social policy fields face similar challenges in conceptualising, and addressing complex drivers of behaviour? • How are they conceptualised? How do policy makers think in other areas?

More Related