1 / 20

Written Arrangements Study Abroad/Exchange/Internships

Written Arrangements Study Abroad/Exchange/Internships. Presented by Betsy Mayotte and Cara Piperni. ANZFAA Melbourne, Vic. October, 2014. Schema. The What The How Resources. The Why. The What. Definitions. Home School:

carter-mays
Télécharger la présentation

Written Arrangements Study Abroad/Exchange/Internships

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Written ArrangementsStudy Abroad/Exchange/Internships Presented by Betsy Mayotte and Cara Piperni ANZFAA Melbourne, Vic. October, 2014

  2. Schema • The What • The How • Resources

  3. The Why

  4. The What

  5. Definitions • Home School: • The school where the student is enrolled in a degree or certificate program • Host School: • The school where the student is taking part of her degree/certificate requirements through a contractual or consortium arrangement with the home school

  6. Definitions • Written arrangement • Assumption is that home school found host school’s academics equal to it’s own • Home school must accept credit of host school • Unless grade not acceptable to home school • Can be indefinite unless written for particular student or group or terms change • International schools cannot have WA with US school for Title IV purposes

  7. Definitions • Written arrangement • Does not include affiliations for international nursing, veterinary and medical schools

  8. Definitions • Written arrangement • Must provide enrolled and prospective students: • Description of written arrangement • Defined portion of program not being provided by home school • Name and location of host school • Method of delivery of that part of program • Estimated additional costs students may incur

  9. Consortium Agreement • Written agreement between two or more eligible schools where host school offers part of the credits needed for the home to school to grant the degree or certificate

  10. Contractual Arrangement • Agreement between an eligible and an ineligible school. International schools may not participate in contractual arrangements for Title IV purposes

  11. “Stair-casing” • Articulation agreements between schools where student take first credential at school A, which is then applied to school B as preliminary credits needed for a second credential. • Allowed between eligible foreign schools other than US schools.

  12. Enrollment Reporting Reporting is the responsibility of the “Home School” • The Home School is the school where the student is enrolled for the purpose of obtaining a degree or certificate. • Enrollment status must include the coursework taken at the “host school”.

  13. practices The How • Independent Study Away • Bilateral Exchange Agreements • Internships

  14. Independent Study Away • Incoming = we might sign • McGill host to student registered at another school • Consortium agreement with the least risk involved • We insist any funding is awarded by home school so not part of our USDL awarding process • Out of scope of our compliance audit and cohort default rate • We confirm only our Title IV eligibility, student cost and enrolment status, and agree not to disburse any funding • Only for individual student/situation, never a blanket consortium agreement.

  15. Independent Study Away • Outgoing = we never sign • McGill student who will pay fees at host institution and return with credits towards their degree • We never sign consortium agreements nor give USDL because of: • Reliance on host school for our disbursing compliance • Host school Title IV eligibility could change; can never verify program of study eligibility nor method of teaching (distance ed) • High frequency enrolment reporting to NSLDS • Not listed in our transcript to track course load • Timeliness of critical information doesn’t meet FSA deadlines • SAP! While grades not included, does impact quantitative component (% credits earned vs. attempted)

  16. Bilateral Exchange Agreements • Falls under FSA manual definition of ‘study-abroad program’ • Partnership with selective schools of equivalent prestige • McGill student registered and pays tuition to McGill • We’ve never disbursed USDL if student going back to U.S. for exchange • The subject of DoE scrutiny during re-certification process

  17. Bilateral Exchange Agreements • DoE asked for a copy of every bi-lateral exchange agreement • We also provided • Our evaluation criteria for evaluating potential exchange partnerships • Overview of clauses we insist upon • Were verbally told that we cannot draw down Title IV funds for that exchange term if with an ineligible school • DoE admitted published list of eligible schools is not updated and is a constant moving target

  18. Bilateral Exchange Agreements • Going forward • Reviewing list of exchange partner schools once per year for Title IV eligibility, and publishing as such • Adding clause to agreement template, putting onus on partner institution to announce any changes in Title IV status • Negotiated with Registrar to have exchange locations identified for all US students, as not indicated on transcript • Updating website, student communications • Preparing statement for US students to use/sign to lodge complaint with their representative re: diminished opportunity for Americans with normal means.

  19. Internships • Our required internships were scrutinized during re-certification process • Internships subject to written arrangements for related program to remain eligible. Exception: • If subject to oversight by an accreditor or government entity for the program, AND • If students are monitored by qualified institutional personnel • McGill was successful in being recognized for this exception

  20. Thank you!Questions?

More Related