1 / 5

MPLS-TP Shared Mesh Protection

MPLS-TP Shared Mesh Protection. IETF 82 – Taipei, November 2011 Authors of draft-cheung-mpls-tp-mesh-protection Authors of draft-pan-shared-mesh-protection. Solutions under Discussion. Draft- cheung - mpls - tp -mesh-protection Taesik Cheung and Jeong -Dong Ryoo (ETRI)

catori
Télécharger la présentation

MPLS-TP Shared Mesh Protection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MPLS-TP Shared Mesh Protection IETF 82 – Taipei, November 2011 Authors of draft-cheung-mpls-tp-mesh-protection Authors of draft-pan-shared-mesh-protection

  2. Solutions under Discussion • Draft-cheung-mpls-tp-mesh-protection • Taesik Cheung and Jeong-Dong Ryoo (ETRI) • Yaacov Weingarten and NuritSprecher (NSN) • Daniel King (Old Dog) • Draft-pan-shared-mesh-protection • Ping Pan, RajanRaoand Biao Lu (Infinera) • Fatai Zhang, Sam Aldrin (Huawei) • Luyuan Fang (Cisco) • Andrew G. Malis (Verizon) • Fei Zhang (ZTE) • MohanaSingamsetty (Tellabs)

  3. SMP Objectives • Sharing of protection resources • Rapid failover (optimized for packet) • Reliable message exchange • All corner cases covered • Back out on failure of protection • Notification to unprotected LSPs • Re-use of existing protection mechanisms where possible

  4. What is SMP?(Required per MPLS-TP Requirements (Req 68, 69, RFC5654)) • Key properties: • Protection LSPs’ are pre-established. • Protection switching priority is assigned for each protection path (need to be known by shared nodes). • Upon failure, a working LSP can be protected based on the priority. • It may pre-empt the other LSP’s. • Unprotected LSP’s are notified. The resources on P-Q-R are shared by multiple working LSP’s

  5. Corner Cases to be Covered • Race condition • P and Q receive requests from different LSP’s having same priority. • P and Q should decide how to resolve it. • Unnecessary service interruption • P3 and P4 should not be interrupted by P2 which will be rejected by Q.

More Related