1 / 24

History of economic thought 4 General equilibrium , theories of growth

History of economic thought 4 General equilibrium , theories of growth. Bernard Chavance ABIK, June 2010. AN ambitious program for neoclassical economics. Hicks, Value and capital ,1939

catrin
Télécharger la présentation

History of economic thought 4 General equilibrium , theories of growth

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. History of economicthought 4General equilibrium, theories of growth Bernard Chavance ABIK, June 2010

  2. AN ambitious program for neoclassicaleconomics • Hicks, Value and capital,1939 • K. Arrow and G. Debreu, ‘The Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy’, Econometrica, 1954 • G. Debreu, The Theory of Value: An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium, 1959 • K. Arrow and F. Hahn, General Competitive Equilibrium, 1971

  3. Kenneth Arrow (b. 1921)

  4. Gérard Debreu (1921-2004)

  5. ‘Nobel Prize’ in economics • A prize of the Bank of Sweden ‘in memory of Alfred Nobel’ • Arrow, 1962 • Debreu, 1983

  6. Rediscovering Walras • A problematic of General equilibrium, different of Marshall’s approach of partial equilibrium • The question of general interdependence of markets • The simultaneous equality of supply and demand on all markets • Three main questions: existence, uniqueness and stability of equilibrium

  7. Main hypotheses • Rational economic agents: • Consumers want to maximize their utility • Producers want to maximize their profits • Preferences of consumers are given • Perfect competition: no agent can influence prices, they are all « price-takers » • Constant returns to scale • A « market participant » or « market secretary » centralizes all information and sets prices through a trial-and-error process

  8. A complete system of future contingent markets • A surprising hypothesis of contingent markets • Setting all contracts for the future period at t0 • The case of ‘an umbrella bought on October 1st and deliverable in Cambridge on December 31st if it rains’ • A method to introduce time … at the same time denying it… • Reducing dynamics (evolution in time) to statics (equilibrium without time)

  9. A mathematical formulation and demonstration • Importance of mathematics in neoclassical economics, from the 1940-1950s • Walras demonstration of general equilibrium was: as many equations as variables, result in one solution (linear algebra) • Referring to new mathematics • Topology • Fixed point theorem

  10. A grand theory • Existence of general equilibrium is demonstrated • The theory may be refined and extended in diverse directions • General equilibrium of perfect competition is a Pareto optimum (the most efficient situation possible for the economy, where all agents get the maximum compatible returns) • Welfare economics theorem: a general equilibrium is a Pareto optimum

  11. The implicit normative stance of neoclassicaltheory • General equilibrium does not exist in the real world • Comparing « imperfect » historical situations with the abstract (perfect) ideal of general equilibrium and Pareto optimum • Policy conclusions: reduce the gap between the imperfect economic state of affairs and the ideal state demonstrated by the theory • Neoclassical theory thus gives a strong confidence to its followers, who believe they do know what should be the best solution to economic problems

  12. DISTURBING conclusions: Internalproblems • The existence of general equilibrium mathematically demonstrated (initial brilliant success) • … but later questioned (Debreu-Sonnenschein-Mantel theorem, 1972-74) • Uniqueness not demonstrated • Stability not demonstrated

  13. Arrow & Hahn, 1971 • Book General Competitive Equilibrium: a general summary of the theory • Underline the problem of abstracting from money and uncertainty • Difficulty to integrate the government and monopolies

  14. External critiques • Total absence of realism of hypotheses (perfect competition, full and transparent information, market participant, future contingent markets, no increasing returns …) • A moneyless economy • No uncertainty • No conflicts • A paradox of a centralized system (with a central coordinator) to describe a decentralized, market economy • Confusing formalization with scientific rigour

  15. Theories of economicgrowth

  16. Harrod-domar model • Roy Harrod: a young colleague of Keynes • Extending the macroeconomic approach to the question of growth • Natural and warranted rates of growth • Conclusion: growth is likely to be very unstable • A « knife-edge » path of growth

  17. The standard neoclassical model (Solow, 1956) • Robert Solow (‘Nobel’ Prize in 1987) • The aggregate production function : Y = f (K, L) • The stability of the growth path is maintained through the flexibility of factors’ prices • The principal engine of growth is technical progress • … but the latter is supposed to be exogenous (to be generated outside the economy) R

  18. Robert Solow (‘Nobel’p. 1987)

  19. Equilibriumthrough time • The concept of ‘balanced’ growth • … or how to keep equilibrium through time • … an extension of the general equilibrium approach

  20. Three conclusions of the neoclassicalgrowth model • 1. increasing capital relative to labor produces economic growth, as people can be more productive given more capital • 2. poor countries with less capital per person will grow faster than rich countries with ample capital : catching-up • 3. because of diminishing returns to capital, economies will eventually reach a point at which no new increase in capital will create economic growth : ‘steady state’

  21. Kaldor and economicgrowth • Explaining « stylised facts » of growth (in the 1950s): • Steady growth of production in volume, and of labor productivity • Steady increase in K/L • Stability of the profit rate on capital • Stability of distribution (wages/profit shares) • Significant differences in the growth of labor productivity and of production in different countries

  22. Kaldor’s contribution • The role of distributional conflicts in stabilizing economic growth • Cumulative and circular causality: chain reactions in economic development • Virtuous and vicious circles: back to unequal development • A criticism of neoclassical growth theory • « The irrelevance of equilibrium economics » (1972)

  23. Endogenousgrowththeory • Paul Romer, Robert Lucas • A renewed neoclassical approach, referring to the aggregate production function • Growth is endogenous, it is generated from within the economic system • The role of Research and Development, of education, of innovation, of infrastructures • Human capital matters, it has increasing rates of return • Restoring a role for the economic intervention of the state

  24. Institutional change • … as a source of economic growth • … developed in the works of Douglass North • … see lectures about « Institutional Economics » !

More Related