1 / 86

mcDESPOT Repeatability at 3T

mcDESPOT Repeatability at 3T. March 25, 2012 Jason Su. Questions. ASSET vs. ARC: How do parallel imaging artifacts propagate through to the maps? Is mcDESPOT w/ B-S B1 correction a repeatable experiment at 3T? What is the effect of inaccurate B1 on each of the maps?

ceana
Télécharger la présentation

mcDESPOT Repeatability at 3T

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. mcDESPOT Repeatability at 3T March 25, 2012 Jason Su

  2. Questions • ASSET vs. ARC: How do parallel imaging artifacts propagate through to the maps? • Is mcDESPOT w/ B-S B1 correction a repeatable experiment at 3T? • What is the effect of inaccurate B1 on each of the maps? • How do the maps compare to 1.5T? • Does MWF remain the same? We would hope it would but does not for UBC group’s MWF

  3. Scanning • 1 volunteer • 2 scans, baseline and follow up exactly 24 hours later • Acceleration: 70% partial k-space, ASSET 2 or ARC 2x1.5 • B-S: TR 500ms, BS FA 270 deg., 32x32 22cm FOV, 6mm slice • Day 0 – no HOS • 8ch head coil: ASSET, ARC • 32ch head coil: ASSET • Day 1 – some HOS • 8ch head coil: ASSET (SSFP HOS), ARC (HOS) • 32ch head coil: ASSET (no HOS), ARC (no HOS) • 6:30 for one complete mcDESPOT protocol at 2mm isotropic

  4. Post-Processing • B-S B1 maps via updated Orchestra recon • Converted to flip angle then “kappa” maps • xmtAddScan and xmtAddFTG are stored in header for efgre3d22M4v04 • Need to add ia_rf1 to header, assuming now that = 32767 when xmtAddScan < 200, otherwise unknown (thankfully not the case) • Linear interpolation from 27 to 80 slices • 3T2 protocol expiry? Interest in getting it running at Sherman and 3T3. • Registration to intermediate “halfway” space • Distributes interpolation errors/blur equally between two volumes • Allows for much better voxelwisecomparison • White matter segmentation is performed with FSL FAST on the registration target • The mask is then eroded with a spherical kernal of radius 2mm to stay away from possible GM edges

  5. ASSET vs. ARC • Images and maps are presented without B1 correction • Would have added an additional variable and not needed for this comparison • Artifacts are more prominent in ASSET • Clear skull aliasing artifact running through center of images • How do parallel imaging artifacts propagate through to the maps?

  6. Sample Images: 32ch ASSET SPGR

  7. Sample Images: 32ch ARC SPGR

  8. Sample Images: 8ch ASSET SPGR

  9. Sample Images: 8ch ARC SPGR

  10. 32ch ASSET: Single T1

  11. 32ch ARC: Single T1

  12. 32ch: Single T1

  13. 32ch: Single T1 in WM

  14. 8ch: Single T1

  15. 8ch: Single T1 in WM

  16. 32ch ASSET: Single T2

  17. 32ch ARC: Single T2

  18. 32ch: Single T2

  19. 32ch: Single T2 in WM

  20. 8ch: Single T2

  21. 8ch: Single T2 in WM

  22. 32ch ASSET: MWF

  23. 32ch ARC: MWF

  24. 32ch: MWF

  25. 32ch: MWF in WM

  26. 8ch: MWF

  27. 8ch: MWF in WM

  28. Conclusions • 32ch coil seems to give less consistent results than 8ch for ARC vs. ASSET • Artifacts are more apparent with 32ch (surprising?) and are responsible for higher percent difference than 8ch • 8ch SPGR images appear better with ASSET • MWF seems less affected by the artifacts than T1 and T2, or at least harder to see

  29. Repeatability • Is mcDESPOT w/ B-S B1 correction a repeatable experiment at 3T? • Will show 8ch ASSET, 8ch ARC, 32ch ASSET • 32ch ARC was not collected at baseline

  30. Sample Image: Kappa Map

  31. Sample Image: Kappa Map

  32. 8ch ASSET 0d: Single T1

  33. 8ch ASSET 1d: Single T1

  34. 8ch ASSET: Single T1

  35. 8ch ASSET: Single T1 in WM

  36. 8ch ARC: Single T1

  37. 8ch ARC: Single T1 in WM

  38. 32ch ASSET: Single T1

  39. 32ch ASSET: Single T1 in WM

  40. 8ch ASSET 0d: Single T1

  41. 8ch ASSET 1d: Single T2

  42. 8ch ASSET: Single T2

  43. 8ch ASSET: Single T2 in WM

  44. 8ch ARC: Single T2

  45. 8ch ARC: Single T2 in WM

  46. 32ch ASSET: Single T2

  47. 32ch ASSET: Single T2 in WM

  48. 8ch ASSET 0d: MWF

  49. 8ch ASSET 1d: MWF

  50. 8ch ASSET: MWF

More Related