1 / 26

Axiomatic set theory

Axiomatic set theory. Jouko Väänänen. Axiom of Choice AC. x. y. Another formulation AC’. x. f. AC  AC’. Choose elements using AC. Make them disjoint. Return to the original sets. AC’  AC. x. f. AC’ gives f. Then take the range of f. You get the set required to exist in AC.

cedric
Télécharger la présentation

Axiomatic set theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Axiomatic set theory Jouko Väänänen Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  2. Axiom of Choice AC x y Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  3. Another formulation AC’ x f Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  4. AC AC’ Choose elements using AC Make them disjoint Return to the original sets Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  5. AC’  AC x f AC’ gives f Then take the range of f You get the set required to exist in AC Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  6. Well-ordering principle Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  7. WO AC Well-order the union The choice set y is the set of points z in the union such that in the particular unique (!) set that z belongs to, it is <-smallest. Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  8. A useful fact • If X is a set, there is no one-one class function f:On  X. • Proof. Otherwise, by the Axiom of Subset Selection, Y=f(On)X is a set. Thus we can form the function f-1:Y  On.By the Axiom of Replacement, f-1(Y) is a set of ordinals. Let  be an ordinal greater than all ordinals in f-1(Y). Then f() is in Y, so =f-1(f()) is in f-1(Y), a contradiction. Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  9. AC’  WO We need a function which picks an element like this From this non-empty set The point is: AC gives such a function Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  10. Zorn’s Lemma A maximal element .... an upper bound Every chain has an .... Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  11. Intuitive proof of ZL Starting from any element we keep picking larger and larger elements until we hit a maximal element. If we do not hit any such, we have anyway built a chain. By assumption, this chain has an upper bound. So we have to hit a maximal element. Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  12. WO Zorn’s Lemma P is first well ordered g() is chosen to be the least (in the w.o.) strict upper bound, if any g() {g(): <} Note that we use recursion on ordinals Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  13. An application of AC • We show that there is a non-measurable set of real numbers. • The collection of measurablesets of real numbers have the following properties: •  and all intervals [a,b] are measurable. • The complement of a measurable set is measurable. • The union of countably many measurable sets is always measurable. • If A is measurable, then A+r={x+r:xA} is measurable, what ever r is. Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  14. Lebesgue-measure • The Lebesgue-measurem(A) of a measurable set A is defined so that the following hold: • m()=0, m([a,b])=b-a • If the measurable sets An are disjoint, then m(nAn)=n m(An) • If A is measurable, then m(A+r)=m(A) for all reals r. Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  15. A non-measurable set • Define on [0,1]: xy iff x-y is rational. • This is an equivalence relation. • By AC there is a set A which has exactly one element from each -equivalence class. • We show that A is non-measurable. • Assume otherwise. Let r=m(A). Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  16. We derive a contradiction • [0,1] q(A+q) [-1,2], where q ranges over Q[0,1]. • 1m(q(A+q))=q m(A+q)=q r3. • If r=0, we cannot have 1  q r • If r>0, we cannot have q r3. • We have arrived at a contradiction. • So A is not measurable. QED Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  17. Banach-Tarski Paradox • Another application of AC: • The unit sphere in the three dimensional Euclidean space can be divided into five pieces so that by reassembling the pieces in space we get two unit spheres of the same size as the original. • The trick: the pieces are non-measurable, so we cannot say that e.g. volume has been doubled. The pieces (or at least some of them) simply do not have volume. Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  18. Ordinal addition   + Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  19. Ordinal addition formally • A=( x {0})( x {1}) • (,i)<A(,j) iff (i<j) v (i=j & <)  1  0 Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  20. Non-commutativity 1 +    + 1  1 has last element does not have last element  1 Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  21. Associativity    + + (+)+ +(+)

  22. Cancellation laws??  +  =  + ’   =’ ? Yes  +  = ’ +    =’ ? No Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  23. Ordinal sum 0 1 2 0+1+2 Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  24. Ordinal sum 0 1  ... ... < Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  25. Example 1 1 1 ... ... n<1= Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  26. Ordinal sum <  ... ... ...   Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

More Related