Download
1 / 17
170 likes | 304 Vues
How to Use Data to Improve Student Learning. How to Use Data to Improve Student Learning Training Conducted at Campus-Based SLO Summit Spring 2014. Participants’ Learning Outcomes . At the end of this training, participants will be able to I nterpret SLO assessment data;
E N D
How to Use Data to Improve Student Learning How to Use Data to Improve Student Learning Training Conducted at Campus-Based SLO Summit Spring 2014
Participants’ Learning Outcomes • At the end of this training, participants will be able to • Interpret SLO assessment data; • Make recommendations based on the interpretations.
We have collected SLO assessment data, now what? • Once we have collected data, we tend to … • Make no recommendations; • Make recommendations that are too broad to be implemented; • Make recommendations but don’t implement them. “We have met the outcome, so no recommendations for improvement at this time.”
Data are meant to be used! • Using assessment data involves— • Interpreting the Data • Making Recommendations (Future Tense) • Implementing Recommendations • Report on Implementation (Past Tense)
Interpreting Data • Explain what factors contributed to the results. • Address why the target was met or not met? • Example 1 • PLO: Identify and describe the use of various ceramic materials, production methods, and firing processes. (Art) • Target Outcome: 70% of students enrolled will pass the final exam for the course. • Actual Results: 85% of the students in the course passed the final exam, exceeding the target. • Interpretation of Data: Further analysis of the data indicated that 15% of the students (16 students) did not meet the outcome, and out of these 16 students, 10 students didn’t describe the firing processes adequately. This raised the questions about the teaching method and assessment method. Is verbal explanation of the firing processes sufficient? What is the best way to test students’ mastery of firing processes?
Making Recommendations Based on Interpretation Interpretation of Data: Further analysis of the data indicated that 15% of the students (16 students) did not meet the outcome, and out of these 16 students, 10 students didn’t describe the firing processes adequately. This raised the questions about the teaching method and assessment method. Is verbal explanation of the firing processes sufficient? What is the best way to test students’ mastery of firing process? Recommendations: Use visual aid to explain the firing process; Use video to demonstrate the firing process; Test students’ mastery of the firing processes by having students display their ceramic art work that is produced by students’ applying firing processes.
Interpret the Data Example 2 PLO: Gather information and formulate conclusions regarding the client's needs and priorities to develop a client centered intervention plan. (Occupational Therapy Assistant) Target Outcome: 80% of students should score a 3 and 100% should score a 2 or above on a scale of 1-3). Actual Result: 54% of the students scored a 3 (Excellent) and 100% of the students scored a 2 Satisfactory). The target was partially met. Interpretation of Data: Faculty discussed the actual results and found that students who failed to score “3” failed to demonstrate critical thinking skills when designing the intervention plan, which prompted the necessity to implement critical thinking activities in OTHA2302.
Making Recommendations Based on Data Interpretation of Data: Faculty discussed the actual results and found that students who failed to score “3” failed to demonstrate critical thinking skills when designing the intervention plan, which prompted the necessity to implement critical thinking activities in OTHA2302. Recommendations: Faculty will design student critical thinking activities and incorporate these activities in OTHA2302.
Implement Recommendations • Recommendations made based on data interpretation need to be implemented during the subsequent assessment cycle. • Ways to implement recommendations include the following: • Make the recommendation a departmental requirement; • Form a taskforce to complete the recommended project; • Implement the recommendation in the classroom; • Other activities.
Report on Implementation Example 1 (Departmental Activity and Chair’s Requirement) The recommendation, “Provide professional development to adjunct faculty with regard to the course content standards set by the department and require them to abide by the standards,” was implemented by the chair who organized the professional development event and also communicated the requirements to the adjunct faculty in Fall 2013. • Report on the implementation by specifying what recommendation was implemented in what way and by when; • Use past tense.
Report on Implementation Example 2(Faculty Classroom Activity): The recommendation, “Faculty will design student critical thinking activities and incorporate these activities in OTHA2302,” was implemented by Faculty who designed and implemented the critical thinking activities in OTHA2302 in Fall 2013.
Report on Implementation Example 3(Taskforce Activity): A taskforce was formed with full-time and part-time faculty representatives to address the recommendation, “Revise the grading rubric to target more discrete skills so that we can identify which area is most challenging to students.” The revised rubric was adopted in Fall 2013. Using the revised rubric, the faculty was able to identify the “translation process” to be the most challenging area for students, so instruction was adjusted to focus more on teaching the “translation process.”
Participants’ Activity • Based on the scenario of data interpretation, please make recommendations and report on the implementation: • Scenario 1: The accounting faculty at a campus found that some aspects of the accounting cycle proved to be difficult to students. Faculty believed that lack of critical thinking skills might have contributed to the difficulty in understanding the accounting cycle concepts.
Participants’ Activity • Based on the scenario of data interpretation, please make recommendations and report on the implementation: • Scenario 2: The Math faculty found that students who failed the exam were online students who failed to complete all the practice exercises.
