1 / 11

Project Overview

Eye In The Sky TCSP # 7 Patent Liability Analysis -Team 3 Upsham Dawra Joe Katz Samit Sura Ashwin Shankar. Project Overview. Portable low-cost aerial drone that can be used for reconnaissance

chance
Télécharger la présentation

Project Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Eye In The SkyTCSP #7Patent Liability Analysis-Team 3UpshamDawra Joe KatzSamitSuraAshwin Shankar

  2. Project Overview • Portable low-cost aerial drone that can be used for reconnaissance • Relay real-time video and data, like location, heading, battery life • Take high-resolution pictures of the ground in flight • Store photos and some flight data in non-volatile memory, á la “blackbox” system. • Control drone manually via a control unit

  3. Block Diagram

  4. Identifying Functions for Analysis • Major Functions Analyzed: • The UAV is controlled manually via the ground using a controller • It will relay real-time video to the ground station • It collects data like GPS coordinates and relays them to base station • First look at 3 patents with possible infringements, then look at competing products.

  5. Possible Infringement #1 • Navigating a UAV under remote control and manual control with three dimensional flight depiction • US Patent #6856894 • Filing Date : 10/23/2003 • Similarities: • Navigating a UAV using remote control device • GPS sends data to ground, which is shown as a 3D model • Doctrine of Equivalents • Has significant differences in algorithm, defined in great detail in patent document. • We never do pixel mapping to GUI to get waypoints

  6. Possible Infringement #2 • Navigating UAVs with an on-board digital camera • US Patent Application #20100004802/A1 • Filing Date : 01/25/2005 • Similarities • Talks about using an on-board digital camera for navigation of UAV • Doctrine of Equivalents • Significant algorithm changes, we never change “resolution of image” or focus on “required number of pixels”

  7. Possible Infringement #3 • Enabling Services on a UAV • US Patent #7509212 • Filing Date : 01/24/2005 • Similarities: • Outlines a method to get data like current position from a UAV • Doctrine of Equivalents • We do not use the data collected to select a “service module”/upload the module to the UAV and use it to select flight patterns etc • Infact, we have manual control throughout.

  8. Competing Products #1 • Robota Triton • Has the same functions as our UAV (GPS coordinates, XBEE RX/TX with base station, high res camera in payload bay, Battery management, custom software for base station, ground remote control) • Closest form to literal infringement (We do not have autopilot) • Retails for 9000$

  9. Competing Products #2 • Microdrone MD4-200 • Similar Functions to our UAV • Remote controlled selectable (autonomous flight available) • Can be configured to take real-time video and send it back to base station • Falls under literal infringement (We do not have autopilot, no hover capability)

  10. Recommended Action • Confirm that the US Patents are no threats, if they are, change the design accordingly • As for the more serious literal infringements: • Check if Robota/Microdrone have patents on this technology • If they do, buying a license or paying royalty fees may be the only viable alternative • No such patents found yet

  11. Feedback • Questions?

More Related