1 / 20

Density dependent groundwater flow at the island of Texel, The Netherlands

Density dependent groundwater flow at the island of Texel, The Netherlands. Gualbert Oude Essink Earth Sciences Utrecht University The Netherlands. Introduction Computer code Model design Discussion Conclusions. Introduction. Salt water intrusion at Texel. Introduction.

channer
Télécharger la présentation

Density dependent groundwater flow at the island of Texel, The Netherlands

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Density dependent groundwater flow at the island of Texel, The Netherlands Gualbert Oude Essink Earth Sciences Utrecht University The Netherlands • Introduction • Computer code • Model design • Discussion • Conclusions

  2. Introduction Salt water intrusion at Texel

  3. Introduction Present ground surface in the Netherlands

  4. Introduction The island of Texel • Tourist island in summer time • Land surface: 130 km2 • Polder areas: • 1. Eijerland • 2. Waal en Burg • 3. Dijkmanshuizen • 4. Hendrik polder • Sand-dune area at western side • ‘De Slufter’ is a tidal salt-marsh • North Sea surrounds the island

  5. Introduction Present phreatic water level in top layer 2000

  6. Introduction Present chloride concentration in top layer 2000

  7. Computer code MOCDENS3D = MOC3D (Konikow et al., 1996) but adapted for density differences • density dependent groundwater flow • Darcy • continuity • solute transport • advection • hydrodynamic dispersion • displacement of fresh, brackish and saline groundwater • linear relation between density & concentration

  8. Computer code Groundwater flow equation (MODFLOW, 1988) Darcy Continuity Freshwater head Advection-dispersion equation (MOC3D, 1996) Equation of state: relation density & concentration

  9. Model design • Effective porosity: 0.3 • Anisotropy: 0.4 • Hydrodynamic dispersion: • aL=2 m, aTH=0.2 m, aTV=0.2 m • molecular diffusion=10-9 m2/s • Density groundwater: • fresh rf=1000 kg/m3, saline rs=1024 kg/m3 Boundary conditions: • No flow at sea side • Neumann in dunes: natural recharge of 1 mm/day • Dirichlet in polder area: constant phreatic water level Subsoil parameters:

  10. Model design ---> aquifer 1: kh=~5 m/day (intersected by aquitards) ---> aquifer 2: kh=~30 m/day (intersected by aquitards) ---> aquitard 1: kh=0.01 to 1 m/day ---> aquifer 3: kh=~30 m/day (intersected by aquitards) ---> aquifer 4: kh=2 m/day ---> aquifer 5: kh=10 to 30 m/day Subsoil composition (simplified):

  11. Model design • Number of elements nx=80, ny=116, nz=23 total number of active elements: ~125000 • Sizes of elements: Dx=250 m, Dy=250 m, Dz=1.5 to 20 m • Particles per element: 8 • Flow time step: 1 year • Convergence criterium: 10-5 m Model parameters:

  12. Discussion Calculated present seepage and infiltration at -1.5 m M.S.L. 2000

  13. Discussion Calculated present salt load at -1.5 m M.S.L. 2000

  14. Discussion • Modelling of two sea level rise scenarios: • I. Present mean sea level during 200 years • II. Relative sea level rise of 0.75 m/century during 200 years Interest is focused on: A. Change in concentration in top layer B. Change in seepage in polders C. Change in salt load in polders

  15. A. Change in concentration in top layer Scenario I: present mean sea level during 200 years 2000 2200

  16. A. Change in concentration in top layer Scenario II: relative sea level rise of 0.75 m/c during 200 years 2000 2200

  17. A. Change in concentration in row 76: East-West profile Scenario II: relative sea level rise of 0.75 m/c during 200 years 2000 2200

  18. B. Change in seepage Scenario II: relative sea level rise of 0.75 m/c during 200 years 2000 2200

  19. C. Change in salt load Scenario II: relative sea level rise of 0.75 m/c during 200 years 2000 2200

  20. Conclusions: • numerical dispersion is limited (no Peclet number problems) • initial density distribution is difficult to determine • present situation is not in a dynamic equilibrium • salinisation during coming 200 years is significant due to: • the present difference in polder level and sea level • the sea level rise • effect of sea level rise: • accelerates the salinisation process • salt load and seepage in polders increases substantial

More Related