1 / 16

The Effect of Fiber Surface Sugar Content on Yarn Properties

The Effect of Fiber Surface Sugar Content on Yarn Properties. Gary R Gamble USDA-ARS-CQRS Clemson, SC. Introduction. Replicate bales of cotton studied both before warehouse storage (0 years) and after warehouse storage (2years)

charis
Télécharger la présentation

The Effect of Fiber Surface Sugar Content on Yarn Properties

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Effect of Fiber Surface Sugar Content on Yarn Properties Gary R Gamble USDA-ARS-CQRS Clemson, SC

  2. Introduction • Replicate bales of cotton studied both before warehouse storage (0 years) and after warehouse storage (2years) • Chemical properties: moisture, surface salts (conductivity), glucose, pH • HVI properties • Yarn properties

  3. Chemical Properties as a Function of Warehouse Storage Age Variety Moisture (%) pH Wax (%) Conductivity Glucose(%) (years) (location) (-1 cm-1) 0 FM832(T) 7.20 6.12 0.65 1025 0.28 PM2200(T) 6.93 6.37 0.57 967 0.17 DP491(G) 6.80 6.75 0.38 692 0.16 PHY355(M) 6.83 6.91 0.44 717 0.09 PM11218(M) 7.10 8.24 0.29 600 0.05 Mean 6.97 a 6.88 a 0.47 a 800 a 0.15 a 2 FM832(T) 6.50 5.71 0.67 900 0.07 PM2200(T) 6.62 6.10 0.46 920 0.05 DP491(G) 6.63 6.33 0.36 680 0.05 PHY355(M) 6.61 6.36 0.28 720 0.03 PM11218(M) 6.60 7.30 0.27 620 0.01 Mean 6.59 b 6.36 a 0.41 a 768 a 0.04 b

  4. HVI Properties as a Function of Warehouse Storage Age Variety Length (cm) Strength Unif (%) Rd +b (years) (location) (g/tex) 0 FM832(T) 3.00 29.74 80.28 78.38 9.59 PM2200(T) 2.79 27.75 81.19 80.41 9.25 DP491(G) 2.87 30.59 80.25 77.34 8.20 PHY355(M) 2.82 29.31 82.00 74.00 8.57 PM11218(M) 2.67 26.26 81.88 74.19 9.72 Mean 2.82 a 28.73 a 81.12 a 76.86 a 9.07 a 2 FM832(T) 3.07 29.40 81.50 74.60 13.60 PM2200(T) 2.82 27.67 83.04 77.99 12.03 DP491(G) 2.90 30.80 81.70 76.75 11.10 PHY355(M) 2.87 28.90 82.10 74.20 10.00 PM11218(M) 2.64 26.00 82.00 74.97 11.34 Mean 2.87 a 28.55 a 82.07 a 75.70 a 11.61 b

  5. Yarn Properties as a Function of Warehouse Storage Age Variety Opening Strength Elong (%) Thicks Thins (years) (location) Waste (%) (g/tex) 0 FM832(T) 1.14 18.78 7.23 712 21 PM2200(T) 0.96 17.16 7.74 611 66 DP491(G) 2.78 18.25 6.87 684 129 PHY355(M) 1.73 17.00 7.41 587 192 PM11218(M) 1.24 16.50 6.33 487 189 Mean 1.57 a 17.54 a 7.12 a 616 a 119 a 2 FM832(T) 1.39 17.57 6.78 535 57 PM2200(T) 1.21 15.55 7.35 670 123 DP491(G) 3.41 17.03 6.52 657 102 PHY355(M) 1.94 15.54 7.07 555 132 PM11218(M) 1.60 14.95 6.17 482 138 Mean 1.91 a 16.13 b 6.78 a 579 a 110 a

  6. Observations • 8% Yarn strength decrease associated with moisture, glucose and (possible) wax decreases due to heat and microbial growth • Decrease in yarn strength accompanied by +b increase, but no change in HVI strength • Is yarn strength correlated with surface chemical (glucose, wax) properties?

  7. Controlled Experiment to TestCorrelation of Glucose with YarnStrength • Spray glucose onto cotton stored in bale form for > 2 years • Spin control cotton and sprayed cotton into 22/1’s yarn via miniature ring spinning • Spin control cotton and sprayed cotton into 20/1’s yarn via full scale (50 lb lot) ring spinning • WARNING: DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME!

  8. Results: Mini-Spinning 100g untreated (control) 100g sprayed with 0.1%(w/w) glucose in water (Treatment) 22/1’s ring yarn on miniature spinning 200 yarn breaks Strength(g/tex)* CV% Elong.(%) Control 16.98 a 7.65 4.94 a Treatment 17.68 b 9.45 4.96 a *Mann-Whitney rank sum test; P=< 0.001

  9. Results: Pilot Spinning 50 lb sprayed with water (control) 50 lb sprayed with 0.1%(w/w) glucose in water (Treatment) 20/1’s ring yarn on pilot spinning 1000 yarn breaks Strength(g/tex)* CV% Elong.(%) Control 19.66 a 8.10 6.12 a Treatment 20.24 b 8.15 5.70 a *Mann-Whitney rank sum test; P=< 0.05

  10. Conclusions • Application of glucose to aged cotton results in a ~3-4% increase in yarn strength • Strength increase observed is not sufficient to explain 8% loss upon ageing of cotton in bale form

  11. Pre-spun Yarns • 20/1’s yarns wound from same roving and ring spinning spindles • Yarns treated by: • A1) soak in H2O:benzoate, freeze-dry, recondition • A2) soak in H2O:glucose:benzoate, freeze-dry, recondition • B1) vacuum-dry, recondition • B2) heat @ 70C, vacuum-dry, recondition

  12. Results-Glucose 2 Ring-spun bobbins treated w. water:benzoate (A1) 2 Ring-spun bobbins treated w. water:glucose:benzoate (A2) 20/1’s ring yarn on pilot spinning 200 yarn breaks Strength(g/tex)* CV% Elong.(%) A1 (w/o glucose) 15.20 a 7.71 6.40 a A2 (w glucose) 15.71 b 8.15 6.82 b *t- test P=< 0.001 ; 3% increase from A1 to A2

  13. Results-Heat 2 Ring-spun bobbins treated @ room temperature (B1) 2 Ring-spun bobbins treated @ 70C (B2)* *HVI values on raw cotton control vs treated at 70C are not significantly different except for +b 20/1’s ring yarn on pilot spinning 200 yarn breaks Strength(g/tex)* CV% Elong.(%) B1 (no heat) 14.04 a 6.90 5.74 a B2 (70 C) 13.38 b 8.45 5.84 a *t- test P=< 0.001 ; 5% decreasefrom B1 to B2

  14. Comparison of Gas Chromatograms of Heat Volatile Components Of New and Aged Cottons

  15. Conclusions • Surface sugars and waxes are correlated with yarn strength • Aged cottons exhibit decreased sugars and loss of wax constituents: resulting loss in yarn strength • Field weathering poses the same implication via heat and rain effects • Other than +b, no HVI indicators

  16. Conclusions • The observed changes appear to be irreversible in practical terms • Measurement of wax constituent ratios may be a potential method for indicating yarn performance-subject of ongoing work Thank you

More Related