1 / 4

Olivier Jolliet, Rolf Frischknecht

SETAC Glasgow 2013. Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators Flagship project of the 3 rd phase of the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Olivier Jolliet, Rolf Frischknecht.

charla
Télécharger la présentation

Olivier Jolliet, Rolf Frischknecht

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SETAC Glasgow2013 Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicatorsFlagship project of the 3rd phase of the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative Olivier Jolliet, RolfFrischknecht

  2. Tentative list of selected impact categories and their relationship/relevance to endpoints(high***,intermediate**,lower* relevance. In red:endpoints to be represented in priority) Integration, normalization & weighting

  3. Feedback from stakeholder workshop in Indonesia, June 2013 • Organised by ShabbirGheewala, and held at the LCA AgriFood Asia Conference, in Bogor, Indonesia, June 24-26, 2013 • Main feedback: • Priority setting is considered appropriate by a majority of respondents • a few suggest to prioritise differentlye.g., respiratory inorganics priority 2, energy resources and eutrophication priority 1, • food security and scarcity considered additional safeguard subject • safeguard subjects “biodiversity” and “resources/ecosystem services” is questioned, rather use “ecosystem health” and “resources” and classify “biodiversity” and “ecosystem services” under “ecosystem health” • other impact categories suggested: “ozone depletion”, “invasive species”, “groundwater contamination by hazardous substances” • questions related to overall outcome of this flagshipe.g. a globally accepted LCIA method? • consider regional impacts and involve regional researchers

  4. Feedback from stakeholder workshop in Indonesia, June 2013 Tentative conclusions • keep list of impact categories and priority setting • discussion needed about overall framework of safeguard subjects • be more clear about deliverable/outcome of this flagship project • increase regional diversity of researchers/experts

More Related