1 / 23

Study of e + e -  pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar

Study of e + e -  pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar. V. Druzhinin (BINP,Novosibirsk) for BaBar Collaboration. ISR method. Mass spectrum of pp system in the e + e -  pp reaction is related to cross section of e + e -  pp reaction at E=m.

charlesp
Télécharger la présentation

Study of e + e -  pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar V. Druzhinin (BINP,Novosibirsk) for BaBar Collaboration

  2. ISR method Mass spectrum of pp system in the e+e- pp reaction is related to cross section of e+e- pp reaction at E=m. e+e- pp cross section depends on two form factors, electric GE and magnetic GM. The ratio of form factors |GE/GM| can be obtained from the analysis of the proton angular distribution. The terms corresponding GM and GE have angular dependence close to 1+cos2 and sin2, respectively. V.Druzhinin

  3. Existing data The existing data come from DCI, ADONE and BEPC e+e- experiments and from pp experiments at LEAR and Fermilab. All data were obtained under |GE|=|GM| assumption. The |GE/GM| ratio was measured at LEAR and found to be compatible to unity. We are going to measure the e+e-pp from threshold up to 4.5 GeV. The advantage of ISR method over conventional e+e- and pp measurements is low dependence of the detection efficiency on mass and proton angle. V.Druzhinin

  4. BaBar detector DCH 40 layers, axial and stereo wires. Covers 92% of solid angle dpt/pt ~ 0.5 -1.5 % Particle ID up to 600 MeV/c • DIRC • Quartz Cherenkov radiator • Covers 80% of solid angle • Particle ID above 600 MeV/c EMC: • 6580 CsI(Tl) crystals • Covers 91% of solid angle • E resolution ~2 % at high E. V.Druzhinin

  5. Event selection Data: 232 fb-1 collected during 1999-2004 • At least 2 tracks with • Rxy < 2.5 cm • z < 6cm • p > 0.1 GeV/c • 0.45 <  < 2.4 • A photon with ECM > 3 GeV and 0.375 <  < 2.4 • Two tracks must pass proton selector • The kinematic fit is applied imposing energy and momentum conservation under different mass hypotheses V.Druzhinin

  6. Event selection K p p K V.Druzhinin

  7. K+K-, +-, +-, e+e- background K+K- background contribution is estimated from the number of events with two identified protons but with 2K <20. The scale factor is obtained from the event sample with one identified photon and MC simulation. The similar method is used for +- background. The e+e- and +- background is estimated using the difference between their mass distributions and pp mass distribution for mass greater than 4.5 GeV. V.Druzhinin

  8. K+K-, +-, +-, e+e- background data K   V.Druzhinin

  9. e+e- pp 0 background The most considerable source of background is the process e+e-pp0 with lost soft photon or with merged photons from 0 decay. These events have 2 distribution peaked at low 2 and can not be separated from the signal events. The events of the e+e-pp0 process were selected using 2 of the kinematic fit to e+e-pp hypothesis and requirement on two-photon invariant mass. The mass spectrum of pp0 events passed our standard selection is determined as KMC(dN/dM)data. The scale factor found from simulation is about 3. V.Druzhinin

  10. ISR background The main source of ISR background is e+e-pp0 process. Using the kinematic fit to pp0 hypothesis we select 847±31 events of this process. From the ratio of the detection efficiencies for pp and pp0 selections, 0.015±0.002, we estimate the number of e+e-pp0 events in pp event sample is 13±3. The similar procedure is used for e+e-pp20 process. The 560±30 selected events of this process translate to 0.5 ±0.3 events passed pp selection. N(1440) e+e-qq with other than pp0 final state is studied with JETSET simulation. Simulation yields 26±4 events. Two final states, pp20 and pp, dominate with 17 and 5 events, respectively. V.Druzhinin

  11. Background subtraction N1 and N2 are numbers of events with 2 < 30 and 30 < 2 <60, respectively. =N1/N2 Since the result of JETSET for rare processes requires confirmation we use the method of background subtraction based on the difference of 2 distributions for signal and background events. pp Nbkg=50±20 is in an agreement with the estimation from simulation, 39±5. pp0 pp0 V.Druzhinin

  12. Mass spectrum V.Druzhinin

  13. Angular distribution The distribution over the angle between the proton momentum in the pp rest frame and the momentum of pp system in the e+e- c.m. frame is fitted by the sum of histograms, obtained from two simulation event samples, one with GE=0 and the other with GM=0. These distributions are close to 1+cos2p and sin2p. V.Druzhinin

  14. Angular distribution The simulated angular distribution are corrected for data-MC difference in PID , tracking and photon efficiencies. About 10% variation of detection efficiency is explained by complex momentum dependence of PID efficiency which has minimum at momentum 1.5 GeV/c. The sources of |GE/GM| systematic error: • background subtraction (0.16) • MC statistics (0.08) • |GE/GM|mass dependence (0.01) • efficiency correction (0.02) V.Druzhinin

  15. Angular distribution,cross-checks To cross-check our method of |GE/GM| measurement we compare the data and simulated distributions over cos K for e+e-   K+K-  process. We also study angular distribution for J/ pp decay which is described by 1+cos2p with =0.672±0.034. Our result is V.Druzhinin

  16. |GE/GM|ratio Hep:-ph/0507085 BaBar |GE/GM| measurements vs previous ones and dispersion relation prediction (yellow) based on JLab space-like GE/GM and analyticity DM2+FENICE • BaBar • LEAR • hep-ph/0507085 E835 V.Druzhinin

  17. Detection efficiency To first approximation the detection efficiency is taken from simulation. The model dependence due to uncertainty in |GE/GM| ratio is about 1% for Mpp<3 GeV/c2, and 10% for higher masses where we use |GE|=|GM| assumption. This MC efficiency must be corrected to account for data-MC difference in detector response: V.Druzhinin

  18. Efficiency corrections V.Druzhinin

  19. Cross section With chosen mass bin the resolution correction insignificantly changes the shape of mass spectrum but leads to about 20% increase in the errors and their correlation. The radiative correction factor is calculated with use of generator level simulation. We evaluate the ratio of the mass spectrum generated with higher-order radiative correction included (structure function method) to pure Born mass spectrum. The theoretical uncertainty is about 1%. V.Druzhinin

  20. Cross section In reasonable agreement with e+e- previous measurements Negative steps at M ~ 2.2 and 3 GeV (!?) V.Druzhinin

  21. Effective proton form factor • Steep behaviour at threshold confirmed • Similar behaviourat threshold is seen in other processes with different quantum numbers V.Druzhinin

  22. J/ and (2S) decays J/ (2S) V.Druzhinin

  23. Summary • The e+e- pp cross section and proton form factor have been measured from threshold up to 4.5 GeV. • The form factor have complex mass dependence. We confirm near-threshold enhancement observed in LEAR experiment. There are also two mass regions, near 2.25 and 3 GeV, with the rapid decrease of the form factor. • The |GE/GM| ratio has been measured from threshold to 3GeV. We have observe noticeable deviation of this ratio from unity, in disagreement with previous LEAR measurement. V.Druzhinin

More Related