1 / 10

Florida Association of Management Information Systems Tallahassee, FL June 9, 2010

Florida Association of Management Information Systems Tallahassee, FL June 9, 2010 . Introduction to Differentiated Accountability . Florida selected by the US Department of Education on July 1, 2008 for participation in the Differentiated Accountability Pilot Program.

charo
Télécharger la présentation

Florida Association of Management Information Systems Tallahassee, FL June 9, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Florida Association of Management Information SystemsTallahassee, FLJune 9, 2010

  2. Introduction to Differentiated Accountability • Florida selected by the US Department of Education on July 1, 2008 for participation in the Differentiated Accountability Pilot Program. • Six states are participating in the Pilot. • Participation allows flexibility in implementing NCLB to target interventions in the neediest schools.

  3. Why Differentiated Accountability? • Streamlines two accountability systems: School Grades and NCLB. • Lengthens and minimizes the Restructuring process for higher performing schools. • Challenges “one size fits all” approach under NCLB by organizing and differentiating federal and state interventions based on school performance. • Specifically identifies which interventions should be applied and who is responsible for implementation, support, and monitoring. • Requires districts to provide students from chronically low-performing schools with new learning environments if improvement is not made. • Provides targeted and high-quality assistance to the State’s lowest performing schools through the Region support system. Department now an active participant in the school improvement process.

  4. *Schools with FCAT performance points of 435 or higher or ungraded schools enter DA after missing Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for two consecutive years starting from 2002-2003. An “AYP Count” value is assigned to all schools. The AYP Count starts at 1 for a school that has missed AYP for two consecutive years. The count increases for each year that a school in DA misses AYP. A school must make AYP two consecutive years to exit DA. If a school in DA then makes AYP one year, the school’s AYP Count freezes.  However, if that school then misses AYP in the following year, the school’s AYP Count resumes. Reaching AYP for two consecutive years resets the AYP Count at zero. To re-enter DA, a school would need to miss AYP for two consecutive years or be graded D or F. **To exit the Intervene category a school must make significant progress after one year. Significant progress is defined as: 1. “C” elementary and middle schools and high schools with 435 FCAT performance points or greater. 2. The school’s AYP performance improves so that at least one subgroup in reading and at least one subgroup in mathematics that previously did not make AYP has made AYP. ***For the purposes of DA, high school status is calculated on FCAT performance only (800 points based on reading, mathematics, writing, and science scores).

  5. Intervene Reconstitution Options • Convert to a District Managed Turnaround School • Close and reassign students • Convert to a Charter • Contract a Private Management Company *Exit Intervene requirement requires the obtainment a “C” (FCAT Performance) and making AYP with one subgroup in reading and one in mathematics that did not make AYP the year before. **After each year the school does not reach the Exit Intervene criteria that selected reconstitution option is eliminated until the school is closed.

  6. Race to the Top and School Improvement Grant • Identification of the persistently lowest-achieving schools • Selection of one of four intervention models (Turnaround, Restart, Close, or Transformational)

  7. Feedback/Questions/Comments….

  8. nikolai.vitti@fldoe.orghttp://www.flbsi.org

More Related