1 / 8

Traffic Separation Scheme for Optimizing WLANs using PHY and MAC options

Traffic Separation Scheme for Optimizing WLANs using PHY and MAC options. Authors:. Date: 2014-03-20. Problem statement. Lots of PHY and MAC techniques enhancing WLAN performance are available. RTS/CTS.

cheche
Télécharger la présentation

Traffic Separation Scheme for Optimizing WLANs using PHY and MAC options

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Takayuki Nishio, Kyoto University Traffic Separation Scheme for Optimizing WLANs using PHY and MAC options Authors: • Date:2014-03-20

  2. Takayuki Nishio, Kyoto University Problem statement • Lots of PHY and MAC techniques enhancing WLAN performance are available. RTS/CTS It is up to traffic condition in a channel whether the techniques increase or decrease the WLAN performance. Channel Bonding It is difficult for WLAN operator to select optimal WLAN options such as RTS/CTS, Channel aggregation etc..

  3. Takayuki Nishio, Kyoto University WLAN traffics Large Volume Multimedia Traffic Such as photos and video streaming, which are transmitted via TCP flow High contention Large number of WLANs including smartphone tethering and Lots of WLAN devices including sensors Busty traffic of short framesSmartphone applications and sensing devices generate huge number of very short data frames.

  4. Takayuki Nishio, Kyoto University Objective Leveraging dual WLAN interfaces enables nodes to separate their traffic in order to make traffic conditions where WLAN options always work well. Conventional Proposed Uniform and stable traffic Mixed traffic Mixed and dynamic traffic It dynamically changes The channel is easy to optimize with the WLAN options

  5. Takayuki Nishio, Kyoto University Traffic Separation Policy Channel 1: Contention Less Channel 2: Other • Traffic • Uplink UDP traffic • Other Uplink traffics • Traffic • TCP traffic • Downlink UDP traffic • Options • Effective options for uncongested WLAN • Frame aggregation • Channel bonding • Short GI • Options • Other effective options for congested WLAN • RTS/CTS • RandomAIFSN [1] [1] OGAWA, K., et.al. (2013). IEEE 802.11ah Based M2M Networks Employing Virtual Grouping and Power Saving Methods. IEICE Trans. on Comm., E96.B(12), 2976–2985.

  6. Takayuki Nishio, Kyoto University Performance evaluation (1/2) Proposed scheme Conventional 40MHz channel 20MHz channel x 2 Num. of STAs: 15 IEEE 802.11n WLAN Auto Rate Fallback: Enable All the STAs use TCP downlink flow Some of the STAs use UDP flow

  7. Takayuki Nishio, Kyoto University Performance evaluation (2/2) RTS/CTS enable RTS/CTS disable Proposed scheme Average throughput of STAs Conventional Number of STAs using UDP uplink flow in each channel

  8. Takayuki Nishio, Kyoto University Conclusion • We proposed the traffic separation scheme which enables WLANs to coordinate traffic so that WLAN options increase the system throughput efficiently. • The advantages of the scheme • It is applicable for lots of WLAN options. • Easy implementation • It can be used for several usage scenario such asminimizing delay, prioritizing real time application etc.. The present study was supported by the Strategic Information and Communications R&D Promotion Programme (SCOPE) of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan.

More Related