1 / 19

Introduction to Arguments

Introduction to Arguments. Three Styles of Argument. Classical (Six-Part Oration) Typically a polarized argument Rogerian A qualified argument—counterargument is key Toulmin Claim, Warrant, Reason and Evidence. Classical Oration– Six-Part Oration Review.

chen
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction to Arguments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction to Arguments

  2. Three Styles of Argument • Classical (Six-Part Oration) • Typically a polarized argument • Rogerian • A qualified argument—counterargument is key • Toulmin • Claim, Warrant, Reason and Evidence

  3. Classical Oration– Six-Part Oration Review • Exordium: Win the attention/goodwill of audience while introducing a subject or problem. • Narration: Presents facts of the case, explaining context • Partition: Divides up the subject, explaining what the claim is, what the key issues are, and in what order the subject will be treated • Confirmation: Offers support for the claim • Refutation: Acknowledges and refuses opposing claims/evidence • Conclusion: Summarizes the claim and moves the audience to action

  4. Modified Six-Part Oration • Introduction • Gains attention • Establishes credibility. • Establishes common ground with audience. • States claim • Background • Presents necessary information • Lines of Argument • Presents good reasons—logical and emotional appeals—to support claim

  5. Modified Six-Part Oration • Alternative Arguments • Examines view of opposing arguments • Notes advantages and disadvantages of these • Explains why your view is stronger • Conclusion • Summarizes argument • Elaborates on implications of your claim • Makes clear what you want the audience to think or do • Reinforces your credibility and could offer an emotional appeal

  6. Rogerian Arguments • Based on the idea that people should not respond to one another until they can fully, fairly, and even sympathetically state the other person’s position • Qualified Arguments • Rhetors concede that alternatives to their claim exist • Some alternatives might even be reasonable in certain circumstances • Meant to promote compromise

  7. Rogerian Arguments – Structure • Introduction • Describe the issue, problem, or conflict • Shows that the rhetor understands and respects any alternative positions • Contexts • Discuss contexts, situations in which the alternative views might be valid • Writer’s Position • States the rhetor’s position and the circumstances in which it is valid • Benefits to opponent • Explains to opponents how they would benefit from adopting the rhetor’s position

  8. Toulmin Argument • Acknowledge the complications of life in arguments • Situations in which the rhetor says sometimes, often, presumably, unless, and almost • Requires the readers to test their ideas and analyze arguments

  9. Start with an enthymeme • Claim + Reason(s) • But there’s so much more! • Here we go! Toulminian Arguments

  10. Claim + Reason Grounds = evidence Grounds

  11. Claim + Reason Warrant = underlying assumption Warrant Grounds

  12. All enthymemes have underlying assumptions • “We should slash the deficit because it’s too big.” • WARRANT: Having a large deficit is bad for the nation. • “Everyone should recycle because it will save the planet.” • WARRANT: The planet is worth saving. Warrants

  13. There can be MULTIPLE warrants in an enthymeme • “Even hate groups should be allowed to hold rallies in public places.” • WARRANT: Freedom of speech applies to everyone. • WARRANT: Freedom of speech is vital to the continued existence of our nation. CAUTION!

  14. MORE CAUTION! • If warrants aren’t controversial, there is likely no need to state or explain them. • Example: The mushroom is poisonous, so don’t eat it! • WARRANT: Eating poisonous things is dangerous. • Controversial warrants need to be justified a bit more, and can lead to faulty arguments. • Example: Grades in high school should be abolished because I don’t like them. • WARRANT: What I don’t like should be abolished.

  15. Claim + Reason A TOULMINIAN ARGUMENT Warrant Grounds Backing

  16. BACKING= justification for the warrant • WARRANT: Freedom of speech is good. • Backing: • Allows minority voices to be heard • Ensures no one is being oppressed • Fosters informed citizenry

  17. Qualifiers • Probably, in my opinion, usually, often, etc. • “That movie will probably be good because the director has made lots of other good movies.” • “While schools should be able to teach sex edbecause it’s vital for teen safety, instructors should also take into account the culture and religious beliefs of their students.” • Concessions/Rebuttals • Exceptions to the claim • “That movie will probably be good because the director has made lots of other good movies. Except his last one. That stunk.” Two Things Missing Here

More Related