1 / 19

Mobile Computing COE 446 Mobile Ad hoc Networks

Mobile Computing COE 446 Mobile Ad hoc Networks. Tarek Sheltami KFUPM CCSE COE http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/coe/tarek/coe446.htm. Many Applications. Personal area networking cell phone, laptop, ear phone, wrist watch Military environments soldiers, tanks, planes Civilian environments

chen
Télécharger la présentation

Mobile Computing COE 446 Mobile Ad hoc Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mobile Computing COE 446Mobile Ad hoc Networks Tarek Sheltami KFUPM CCSE COE http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/coe/tarek/coe446.htm

  2. Many Applications • Personal area networking • cell phone, laptop, ear phone, wrist watch • Military environments • soldiers, tanks, planes • Civilian environments • taxi cab network • meeting rooms • sports stadiums • boats, small aircraft • Emergency operations • search-and-rescue • policing and fire fighting

  3. Why Ad hoc Networks? • No infrastructure needed (no routing in fixed wireless) • Can be deployed quickly, where there is no wireless communication infrastructure present • Can act as an extension to existing networks  enhances coverage • Cost-effective – cellular spectrum costs $XX billion • Adaptive computing and self-configuring • Support for heterogeneous computational devices and OSs

  4. Ad hoc Constraints • Dynamic topologies • Bandwidth-constrained • Constraints on Tx power • Infrastructure-less property, no central coordinators  hidden terminal, exposed terminal • No QoS preservation • Load balancing • Energy-constrained operation • Limited physical security

  5. Background • Table-driven routing protocols • Routing • Disadvantages • On-demand routing protocols • Routing • Disadvantages • Cluster-based routing protocols (Laura Feeney, Infocom 2001) • Routing • Disadvantages

  6. DSDV Routing Protocol

  7. Return DSDV Routing Protocol (Cont’d)

  8. Return Disadvantages of Table Driven Protocols • Routing is achieved by using routing tables maintained by each node • The bulk of the complexity in generating and maintaining these routing tables • If the topological changes are very frequent, incremental updates will grow in size

  9. DATA DATA 1,2,8 1,2,5,8 5,2,1 8,5,2,1 2,1 DATA 1,3,4,8 1,3,4,7,8 1,8 1,3,4,8 1,3,8 1,8 1,3,6,8 1,3,8 On-demand Routing Protocol (DSR) D X S

  10. X X Return AODV Routing Protocol DATA D DATA DATA DATA timeout DATA S

  11. Return Disadvantages of On-demand Protocols • Not scalable to large networks, because of the source routing requirement. Furthermore, the need to place the entire route in both route replies and data packets causes a significant overhead. • Some of them requires symmetric links between nodes, and hence cannot utilize routes with asymmetric links.

  12. Cluster-based Routing Transmission Range of MT 1

  13. Cluster-based Routing.. Range of MT 1

  14. Cooperative Routing vs Direct Sending Power-aware localized routing in wireless networks Stojmenovic, I.; Lin, X.; Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on Volume 12, Issue 11, Nov. 2001 Page(s):1122 – 1133 • In simple radio model, a radio dissipates Eele = 50 nJ/bit at the sender and receiver sides. Let us assume the d is the distance between the source and destination, then, the energy loss is d2. The transmit amplifier at the sender consumes Eampd2, where Eamp = 100 pJ/bit/m2. Therefore, from the sender side, to send one bit at distance d, the required power is Eele + Eampd2, whereas at the receiver will need is Eele only. Normalizing both by dividing by Eamp: • Pt = E + d2 and Pr = E, where Pt and Pr are the normalized transmission and reception power respectively, and E = Eele / Eamp = 500m2 • At the HCB-model, the power needed for transmission and reception at distance d is: u(d) = Pt + Pr = 2E + d2 u(d) = adα + c

  15. Cooperative Routing vs Direct Sending.. • Where in HCB-model α = 2, a = 1, and c = 2E = 1,000 • Let us assume that the source S can reach the destination D directly. Let us further assume that there is a middle node between the source and the destination. Let |SA| = x and |SD| = d as in the below Figure • Ifd > (c/(a(1-21-α)))1/α, then there is an intermediate node A between the source and destination such that the retransmission of the packet through A will save the energy. Moreover, the greatest saving is achieved when A in the middle of SD.

  16. Cooperative Routing vs Direct Sending.. • Also if d > (c/(a(1-21-α)))1/α, then the greatest power saving are obtained when the interval SD is divided into n > 1 equal subintervals, where n is the nearest integer to d(a(α-1)/c)1/α.

  17. Cooperative Routing vs Direct Sending.. • Now the power needed for direct transmission is u(d) = adα + c, which is optimal when d≤(c/(a(1-21-α)))1/α, otherwise when d>(c/(a(1-21-α)))1/α, n-1 is equally spaced nodes can be selected for transmission, • Where, n = d(a(α-1)/c)1/α • The minimal power: v(d) = dc(a(α-1)/c)1/α + da(a(α-1)/c)(1-α)/α

More Related