1 / 36

SCHE in EUROPE The Missing Link : Level 5 EQF Preliminary results Amsterdam , 18 June 2010

SCHE in EUROPE The Missing Link : Level 5 EQF Preliminary results Amsterdam , 18 June 2010 Magda Kirsch & Yves Beernaert Educonsult. EURASHE SCHE study 2010 : Context. In 2003 the European Commission commissioned EURASHE to carry out a study on TSC study in Europe.

chiara
Télécharger la présentation

SCHE in EUROPE The Missing Link : Level 5 EQF Preliminary results Amsterdam , 18 June 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SCHE in EUROPE The Missing Link : Level 5 EQF Preliminary results Amsterdam, 18 June 2010 Magda Kirsch & Yves Beernaert Educonsult

  2. EURASHE SCHE study 2010: Context • In 2003 the European Commission commissioned EURASHE to carry out a study on TSC study in Europe. • In order to monitor progress that has been made in the field of short cycle higher education in Europe, the European Commission has asked EURASHE to carry out a follow-up report. • The study is made by Yves Beernaert and Magda Kirsch (EDUCONSULT), two of the researchers who also carried out the first Eur. TSC study in 2003. • They are at present collecting information and the results of the study should be available at the end of 2010.

  3. Scope of the 2003 SCHE Study • EU Member States (27) + EEA + TR + HR • Focus on both post-secondary (level 4) and SCHE (level 5 of EQF) • No focus on employability and multilingualism • A close link with the Berlin Ministerial conference 2003: preparatory document

  4. The Berlin Ministerial Conference: A turnaround forSCHE in the Bologna Process Berlin Communiqué (2003): ´Realising the European Higher Education Area’ : comprehensive restructuring of the Eur. HE • to promote links between the European Research Area (ERA) and the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) PhD. was added to two-cycle system . • to elaborate an overarching framework of qualifications for the EHEA that would encompass the wide range of flexible learning paths, opportunities and techniques, and would make appropriate use of the ECTS credits. • encouraged the MS to elaborate a framework of comparable and compatible qualifications for their higher education systems, describing qualifications in terms of workload, level, learning outcomes, competences and profile • stressed the important contribution of HE in making LLL a reality (including RPL)

  5. The Berlin Ministerial Conference: A turnaround forSCHE in the Bologna Process As a result of the study on TSCMinisters also invited the Bologna Follow-up Group ‘to explore whether and howshorter higher education may be linked to the first cycle of a qualifications framework for the European Higher Education Area’

  6. Scope of the 2010 European Study • EU Member States (27) + EEA + TR • Focus solely on SCHE (Level 5 of EQF) • No focus on post secondary education (level 4) • Development as to SCHE in the light of EQF and NQF developments • Special focus on • Employability • Multilingualism • Close link with EU strategy Ed & Tr 2010

  7. EURASHE SCHE study 2010Definition for SCHE • European Higher Education Area Framework (3 cycles) • within the first cycle, short cycle higher education qualifications typically including or represented by approximately 120 ECTS credits – within national contexts - see also Dublin descriptor for this qualification • EQF for LLL (8 levels) = Translation device for NQF • Level 5 • See also descriptor for level 5 in the EQF

  8. Methodology :SCHE study 2010 • Information collected by 4 regional coordinators • Country reports/files made by researchers sent for approval to Ministries of Education • Whenever necessary in-depth interviews to complete data • Comparative European report • Examples of good practice • Conclusions & recommendations

  9. SCHE study 2010:Difficultiesencountered • Collection of information • Difficulties with on-line tool • Slow reaction of certain ministries • Certain responses not clear (even inaccurate!) • Few responses from institutions • Discrepancy between situation at federal and regional level in some countries • Lack of knowledge about EQF • Still confusion about the status of L5

  10. SCHE study 2010: status 5/06/2010 • Around 65 respondents on-line ( so far!) • Responses from 23 Ministries for part A • all countries • Responses from 18 Ministries for part B • countries which have SCHE (level 5) • Personal interviews with some ministries scheduled

  11. SCHE study 2010: 23 respondents

  12. SCHE study 2010: 22 respondents

  13. SCHE study 2010: Whereis SCHE situated in NQF?

  14. SCHE study 2010: 18 respondents

  15. SCHE study 2010: Access

  16. SCHE study 2010: Duration

  17. SCHE study 2010: Objectives

  18. SCHE study 2010:

  19. SCHE study 2010: Involvement

  20. SCHE study 2010:

  21. SCHE study 2010:

  22. SCHE study 2010:

  23. SCHE study 2010:Transition to level 6

  24. SCHE study 2010:Participation in SCHE

  25. SCHE study 2010:Participation in SCHE: 15 respondents • Nearly 1.5 Million students • 53%Male, 47% Female • In most countries a majority of FT students (between 70% and 90%) • Four exceptions: UK (35%FT?), SI (45%), Ireland (58%) and LV (52%) and • between 10% and 70% mature students • Majority in NL, NO, SE, SI and UK mature students • In more than half of the countries students from disadvantaged groups or students with a low socio-economic background are more represented in SCHE than in other areas of HE

  26. SCHE study 2010:ECTS – DS - CS

  27. SCHE study 2010:Profile of teachers

  28. SCHE study 2010Mobility

  29. SCHE study 2010Employability

  30. SCHE study 2010Employability • There is a demand for graduates at level 5 in all countries concerned but decreasing in some countries (e.g. NO) • Employed as highly skilled technicians (7) or white collar/health care workers (6).

  31. Some conclusions • EU strategy in ED & TR is not well known • EQF is not well known • NQF is progressing / expanding • Link between EQF and NQF is not always clear • Confusion about the status of L5 SCHE • SCHE L5 is gradually developing further across Europe (e.g. NL, Bnl...)

  32. Some conclusions • 1,5 MIO students • Majority of SCHE is in HE Institutions • Minority in secondary schools etc. • SCHE is clearly in line with all major developments in HE • Variety of access routes • Professional orientation • Theory + practice (+ placements)

  33. Some conclusions • Involvement of business & social partners • Mostly full-time education (but 5 countries majority mature students – half time) • Flexible learning environments • Most popular in: business, admin., hospitality, ICT • Transition to level 6 is common but... • Strong involvement in internationalisation: • Credits, diploma supplement, mobility, projects

  34. Some conclusions • QA mechanisms as in other HE • Accreditation • Employability: rather high but ....decreasing in some highly developed economies • Clear involvement of business, TU, prof. bodies • Promotion of Multilingualism rather low • Social commitment L5 • Link L5 and skills needs ! • L5 is necessary link between L4 and L6

  35. Recommendations • Promote strong links between L5 and HE • Clarify the title(s) held: e.g. Associate degree • Clarify link L4 – L5: ECVET and ECTS • Strengthen social / societal role of L5 • Access to HE for youngsters of low SES • Organise PLAs for decision-makers as to L5 to share good practice • Link up with L5 developments across world

  36. ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

More Related