1 / 18

II-VI semiconductor microcavities

II-VI semiconductor microcavities. microcavity physics polariton stimulation prospects. Semiconductor microcavity. z. mirror. optical cavity ~ 1 µm. QW ~ 10 nm. Confinement along z for both cavity modes and QW excitons 2D light-matter interaction.

chloe
Télécharger la présentation

II-VI semiconductor microcavities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. II-VI semiconductor microcavities • microcavity physics • polariton stimulation • prospects

  2. Semiconductor microcavity z mirror optical cavity ~ 1 µm QW ~ 10 nm Confinement along z for both cavity modes and QW excitons 2D light-matter interaction

  3. Selection rule : conservation of in-plane wavevector k// exciton (k//)  cavity mode (same k//) 2D light-matter interaction UP cavity mode exciton kz1, k// kz2, k// cav Rabi X LP cav ,, X < Rabi strong coupling regime : polaritons > weak coupling regime : Purcell effect

  4. Polariton in-plane dispersion Cavity mode confined along z : k1z ~ 8.106 m-1 >> k// photon dispersion >> exciton dispersion photon mass ~ 10-4 exciton mass Polariton = photon * exciton polariton DOS ~ 10-4 exciton DOS

  5. Polariton features • finite lifetime  1 ps (mirror reflectivity) • high radiative recombination rate • k//  • k// = ( / c) sin • direct injection / probe of polariton population • LP = trap in k space with small DOS • macroscopic state occupancy can be achieved for densities well below the exciton screening limit • bosonic final state stimulation  Bose condensation z  k//

  6. II-VI VS III-V • Lattice mismatch

  7. II-VI VS III-V • GaAsCdTe ZnSe • Oscillator strength (x 1013 cm-2 ) 0.6 2.3 • Rabi splitting ~ 6 meV 4 QWs one QW • Exciton binding energy (meV) 1025 40 • screening density (x 1011 cm-2 ) < 1 5 > 10 II-VI microcavities well suited for polariton condensation

  8. Probe of polariton population PL measured at different angles  to the microcavity normal 24 QWs T = 4K   + 5 meV

  9. II-VI VS III-V Probe of polariton population N  PL  Bottleneck effect

  10. Polariton stimulation Non-resonant quasi-cw excitation

  11. Polariton stimulation polariton-polariton scattering  P2 ! Bosonic final state stimulation

  12. Polariton stimulation Suppression of bottleneck effect

  13. Polariton stimulation New polariton dispersion above stimulation threshold Evidence of macroscopic coherence ? (Ciuti, PRB 2001)

  14. Resonant excitation : parametric gain

  15. Parametric gain : II-VI VS III-V M. Saba et al., Nature 2001

  16. Parametric gain : II-VI VS III-V M. Saba et al., Nature 2001

  17. Prospects • Polariton stimulation under non-resonant excitation conditions at RT ? • Larger exciton binding energy, e.g. in ZnSe, GaN, organic microcavities • Deeper trap / scattering efficiency ?

  18. Microcavity activities in Grenoble Polariton stimulationSingle photon solid source (2D microcavity + QW) (0D microcavity + QD) Régis André Régis André Robert Romestain Robert Romestain Le Si Dang Le Si Dang Maxime Richard (PhD) Jean-Michel Gérard Kuntheak Kheng Henri Mariette Yvan Robin (PhD) Sebastian Moehl (PhD)

More Related