1 / 88

PORT DARLINGTON WPCP EXPANSION PROJECT

PORT DARLINGTON WPCP EXPANSION PROJECT. WEAO Student Design Competition. Ryerson University Design Team : Nancy Afonso Ruston Bedasie Kirill Cheiko Andrew Iammatteo. Introduction. Regional Municipality of Durham has identified a need to expand the Port Darlington WPCP in two phases

christine-thulani
Télécharger la présentation

PORT DARLINGTON WPCP EXPANSION PROJECT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PORT DARLINGTON WPCPEXPANSION PROJECT WEAO Student Design Competition Ryerson University Design Team: Nancy Afonso Ruston Bedasie KirillCheiko Andrew Iammatteo

  2. Introduction • Regional Municipality of Durham has identified a need to expand the Port Darlington WPCP in two phases • Port Darlington WPCP – services the Bowmanville Urban Area Port Darlington WPCP • Objectives: • Develop preliminary design and layout for Phase I expansion • Conceptually design the Phase II expansion • Adhere to design philosophy and limit usage of chemicals • Achieve innovation based on field proven projects, with environmental sustainability and cost awareness always in mind. (Courtesy of Google Maps)

  3. Outline • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Design Basis and Challenges • Process Selection and Facility Design: • Headworks • Primary Treatment • Secondary Treatment • Disinfection • Solids Handling • Additional Considerations • Process Control • Phase I Economic Analysis • Recommendations and Closing Remarks

  4. DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Design Basis and Challenges

  5. Plant Loading • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Hydraulic Loading: • Pollutant Loading:

  6. Effluent Criteria • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS

  7. Design Challenges • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • An alternative method of disinfection • Nitrification • Technologies selected must integrate into the existing plant • Al2(SO4)3 for P removal must be reconsidered • Phase I design and layout must take into account space limitations for Phase II

  8. DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Process Selection and Facility Design

  9. PFD – Phase I • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Primary Treatment Secondary Treatment Disinfection Preliminary Treatment Phase I Sludge Thickening Existing Sludge Stabilization

  10. Plant Layout • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS (Courtesy of Google Maps)

  11. Phase I Expansion • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS

  12. Phase I Expansion • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Headworks

  13. Phase I Expansion • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Primary Clarifiers

  14. Phase I Expansion • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS BNR Bioreactors

  15. DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Phase I Expansion Secondary Clarifiers

  16. Phase I Expansion • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS UV Facility

  17. Phase I Expansion • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Fermenter

  18. Phase I Expansion • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Gravity Belt Thickener

  19. Hydraulic Profile • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Conduit from Headworks Outfall Pipe L.L.EL. 79.66 m Available head = 3.0 m L.L.EL. 76.64 m

  20. Headworks • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Headworks

  21. Headworks • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Installation of two 94 kW raw sewage pumps • Commissioning of third headworks channel • Commissioning of aerated grit tank

  22. Primary Treatment • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Primary Clarifiers

  23. Primary Treatment • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Four (4) rectangular clarifier installation • Total Volume: 1960m3 • BOD Removal: 30% • TSS Removal: 55% • HRT: 3.5h @ ADF • Chain & flight scum/sludge collection

  24. Secondary Treatment • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS BNR Bioreactors

  25. Process Selection • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Activated Sludge with incorporated biological nutrient removal (BNR) • Reduced chemical dependency • Reliable effluent quality • Low sludge production • Sludge has higher levels of bioavailable nutrients • Reduced aeration requirements • Improved sludge settleability • Environmentally sustainable

  26. Process Selection: WESTBANK • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS VFAs Influent BNR Bioreactor Secondary Clarifier Secondary Effluent ANOXIC AEROBIC PREANOXIC ANAEROBIC NMLR WAS RAS

  27. Equipment Design • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS 40% 20% 40% = Anaerobic = Anoxic = Aerobic

  28. Equipment Design • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Mechanical Mixers Fine Bubble Diffusers = Anaerobic = Anoxic = Aerobic

  29. Equipment Design • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Total Bioreactor Volume: 1,782m3 • SRT: 12 days • HRT: 12.5 hours @ ADF • Average MLSS: 3,000 mg/L • Required VFA concentration: 15 – 25 mg/L 7.8% 8% 4.8% 79.4% Mechanical Mixers Fine Bubble Diffusers = Anaerobic = Anoxic = Aerobic

  30. DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Secondary Treatment Secondary Clarifiers

  31. Secondary Clarifiers • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Based on the solids loading rate • “Gould II” type clarifiers • Common sludge collector between sets of two clarifiers

  32. Disinfection • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS UV Facility

  33. Process Selection • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Provide additional hydraulic capacity and meet new compliance criteria • Selection between chlorination/dechlorination and UV disinfection • UV disinfection selected: • Effluent toxicity and safety issues with chlorination • Costs of two processes are becoming comparable • UV capable of the same process reliability, performance track record, and full automatic control capability • Minimal space requirements

  34. Design Basis • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Open – channel, modular design with horizontal, LP-HI lamps • Design Objective: 100 E.Coli/100 mL at PDF • UV Transmittance of 65% (Courtesy of Trojan Technologies Inc.)

  35. Automatic Level Controller ∆ Water Level = 0.881m PDC and Hydraulic Manifold UV Banks 48 lamps/bank UV Facility Design • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • UV Dose of 30 mW.s/cm2 using LP-HI lamps • 3 channels constructed: 1 Duty and 1 Redundant (equipped); 1 for Phase II (channel only) Automated quartz sleeve cleaning system Variable output electronic ballasts (Courtesy of Trojan Technologies Inc.)

  36. Solids Handling • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Fermenter

  37. Fermenter • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Bio-P removal requires VFAs as a source of energy • Insufficient VFA supply during winter • Addition of a static fermenter will accomplish two goals: • Provide a source of additional VFA’s • Increase sludge solids concentration

  38. Fermenter Schematic • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Influent Sludge from Primary Clarifiers VFA VFA VFA VFA Rich Supernatant to Anaerobic Zones Effluent Sludge to Digesters (Courtesy of www.gc3.com)

  39. Fermenter Design • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Design Basis: • SRT required: 3-5 days • Sludge loading: 1517 kg/d or 36.8 m3/d (PMF) • Fermenter Design Summary: • Volume: 157 m3 (10 m diameter, 2 m tall) • Sludge solids concentration increased from 4% to 6% • Additional VFAs supplied to the BNR process: 11.2 mg/L

  40. Solids Handling • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Gravity Belt Thickener

  41. Thickening • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Construction of a new digester incurs large capital investments • Thickening can reduce the volume of sludge and allow the use of the existing digesters • Gravity Belt Thickener • Good control capabilities • High cake solids concentration • Relatively low capital and operating costs

  42. Gravity Belt Thickener • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS - Sludge - Separated water

  43. Gravity Belt Thickener • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Design Basis: • Peak solids loading: 13,784 kg/d • Peak hydraulic loading: 675 m3/d • Desired cake solids concentration: 7% • GBT Design Summary: • Length-Width-Height: 5.1 m : 1.7m : 1.5 m • Belt width: 1.2 m • Solids capture: ~95% • Polymer Usage: 2-4 kg/tonne of sludge

  44. Additional Considerations Phase II Conceptual Design • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Noise & odour control • Septage receiving station • Backup generator • Phase II Conceptual Design Phase II Liquid Facility Courtesy of Envirocan

  45. Phase II Conceptual Design • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Phase II Solids Facility

  46. DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS Process Control

  47. Highlights of Process Control • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Plant to be operated with minimum supervision required • Process Control will rely on automation and plant operators • Existing SCADA system is to be upgradedto include control in addition to monitoring (Courtesy of Port Darlington WPCP)

  48. MOE Requirements • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS • Compliance Sampling required by the MOE • (To be done by the operators)

  49. Process Control • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS 1 2 3 4 5 6 • Performance monitoring Sampling • (To be done by the operators)

  50. Process Control • DESIGN BASIS AND CHALLENGES • PROCESS SELECTION AND FACILITY DESIGN • PROCESS CONTROL • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSING REMARKS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 • Automatic Monitoring and Control (SCADA)

More Related